{"title":"心血管手术后吞咽困难的时间恢复和预后因素:回顾性分析和预测评分的制定","authors":"Nao Hashida S.L.P. , Kiyohito Hosokawa M.D., Ph.D. , Ai Kawamura M.D., Ph.D. , Motoyuki Suzuki M.D. , Itsuki Kitayama M.D. , Masayuki Nozawa M.D. , Eri Okajima S.L.P. , Madoka Sugamoto S.L.P. , Akinari Sugauchi D.D.S., Ph.D. , Wataru Sahara M.D., Ph.D. , Shigeru Miyagawa M.D., Ph.D. , Hidenori Inohara M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Dysphagia is a common complication associated with cardiovascular surgery (CVS). This study sought to better understand recovery timelines, identify risk factors, and create a prognostic model for oral intake restoration.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 134 patients who had CVS between April 2022 and March 2024. We assessed swallowing ability through fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). We randomly divided the patients’ data into a training dataset and a test dataset in a ratio of 70/30 and Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to assess predictors of total oral intake. We also created a scoring system using the estimated regression coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most patients with CVS achieved total oral intake in 7–11 days after extubation. Over 168 h of intubation, the presence of penetration or aspiration, a poor FEES score (score > 6), and perioperative complications were significant risk factors for delayed total oral intake. The predicting score was calculated by adding the scores for each individual factor, including FEES score, penetration/aspiration, and preoperative complications. Scores ranged 0–8, categorizing patients into 0–2, 3–5, and 6–8 groups, clearly demonstrating that the higher the predicting score, the longer the time to total oral intake in both the training and the test dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All risk factors for unsuccessful or delayed total oral intake were intubation for more than a week, poor swallowing ability, and the presence of perioperative complications. The scoring system accurately predicts the restoration of oral intake following CVS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19482,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 112534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724001837/pdfft?md5=0921176145285ec37fb9639405cc6212&pid=1-s2.0-S0899900724001837-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal recovery and prognostic factors for dysphagia following cardiovascular surgery: Retrospective analysis and development of predictive score\",\"authors\":\"Nao Hashida S.L.P. , Kiyohito Hosokawa M.D., Ph.D. , Ai Kawamura M.D., Ph.D. , Motoyuki Suzuki M.D. , Itsuki Kitayama M.D. , Masayuki Nozawa M.D. , Eri Okajima S.L.P. , Madoka Sugamoto S.L.P. , Akinari Sugauchi D.D.S., Ph.D. , Wataru Sahara M.D., Ph.D. , Shigeru Miyagawa M.D., Ph.D. , Hidenori Inohara M.D., Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Dysphagia is a common complication associated with cardiovascular surgery (CVS). This study sought to better understand recovery timelines, identify risk factors, and create a prognostic model for oral intake restoration.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 134 patients who had CVS between April 2022 and March 2024. We assessed swallowing ability through fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). We randomly divided the patients’ data into a training dataset and a test dataset in a ratio of 70/30 and Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to assess predictors of total oral intake. We also created a scoring system using the estimated regression coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most patients with CVS achieved total oral intake in 7–11 days after extubation. Over 168 h of intubation, the presence of penetration or aspiration, a poor FEES score (score > 6), and perioperative complications were significant risk factors for delayed total oral intake. The predicting score was calculated by adding the scores for each individual factor, including FEES score, penetration/aspiration, and preoperative complications. Scores ranged 0–8, categorizing patients into 0–2, 3–5, and 6–8 groups, clearly demonstrating that the higher the predicting score, the longer the time to total oral intake in both the training and the test dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All risk factors for unsuccessful or delayed total oral intake were intubation for more than a week, poor swallowing ability, and the presence of perioperative complications. The scoring system accurately predicts the restoration of oral intake following CVS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724001837/pdfft?md5=0921176145285ec37fb9639405cc6212&pid=1-s2.0-S0899900724001837-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724001837\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724001837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporal recovery and prognostic factors for dysphagia following cardiovascular surgery: Retrospective analysis and development of predictive score
Objective
Dysphagia is a common complication associated with cardiovascular surgery (CVS). This study sought to better understand recovery timelines, identify risk factors, and create a prognostic model for oral intake restoration.
Methods
This retrospective study included 134 patients who had CVS between April 2022 and March 2024. We assessed swallowing ability through fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). We randomly divided the patients’ data into a training dataset and a test dataset in a ratio of 70/30 and Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to assess predictors of total oral intake. We also created a scoring system using the estimated regression coefficients.
Results
Most patients with CVS achieved total oral intake in 7–11 days after extubation. Over 168 h of intubation, the presence of penetration or aspiration, a poor FEES score (score > 6), and perioperative complications were significant risk factors for delayed total oral intake. The predicting score was calculated by adding the scores for each individual factor, including FEES score, penetration/aspiration, and preoperative complications. Scores ranged 0–8, categorizing patients into 0–2, 3–5, and 6–8 groups, clearly demonstrating that the higher the predicting score, the longer the time to total oral intake in both the training and the test dataset.
Conclusions
All risk factors for unsuccessful or delayed total oral intake were intubation for more than a week, poor swallowing ability, and the presence of perioperative complications. The scoring system accurately predicts the restoration of oral intake following CVS.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition has an open access mirror journal Nutrition: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Founded by Michael M. Meguid in the early 1980''s, Nutrition presents advances in nutrition research and science, informs its readers on new and advancing technologies and data in clinical nutrition practice, encourages the application of outcomes research and meta-analyses to problems in patient-related nutrition; and seeks to help clarify and set the research, policy and practice agenda for nutrition science to enhance human well-being in the years ahead.