择期和急诊右半结肠切除术患者的护理过程和结果差异。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0056
J Banks, A Rashid, T R Wilson, C P Challand, M J Lee
{"title":"择期和急诊右半结肠切除术患者的护理过程和结果差异。","authors":"J Banks, A Rashid, T R Wilson, C P Challand, M J Lee","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 30% of patients with colorectal cancer present as an emergency and have worse outcomes than elective patients. Compared with left-sided cancers, malignancies arising in the right colon are significantly under-researched. We sought to compare cancer care quality and clinical outcomes between emergency and elective presentations of right-sided colon cancer (RCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective study included all patients who underwent operative management for a RCC, from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2022. Data were collected from electronic patient records, and host and tumour factors as well as outcomes between emergency and elective cohorts were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 806 patients (median age 72 years) were included. Some 175 patients (22%) presented as an emergency: 140 in obstruction and 35 with tumour perforation, compared with 1 patient with tumour perforation in the elective group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The emergency group had higher rates of postoperative complications (59.1% vs 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), increased 90-day mortality (13.7% vs 1.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (5 vs 10 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). From the emergency cohort only 29.2% of eligible patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and in multivariate regression analysis emergency presentation was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.26 [0.14-0.47], <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both short- and long-term outcomes after emergency presentation of RCC are poor, with inadequate access to subsequent chemotherapy. Strategies addressing emergency presentations of left-sided tumours have moved towards temporisation and elective surgery. Delaying major resectional surgery for optimisation may improve outcomes and access to adjuvant therapies for RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process and outcome differences in the care of patients undergoing elective and emergency right hemicolectomy.\",\"authors\":\"J Banks, A Rashid, T R Wilson, C P Challand, M J Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 30% of patients with colorectal cancer present as an emergency and have worse outcomes than elective patients. Compared with left-sided cancers, malignancies arising in the right colon are significantly under-researched. We sought to compare cancer care quality and clinical outcomes between emergency and elective presentations of right-sided colon cancer (RCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective study included all patients who underwent operative management for a RCC, from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2022. Data were collected from electronic patient records, and host and tumour factors as well as outcomes between emergency and elective cohorts were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 806 patients (median age 72 years) were included. Some 175 patients (22%) presented as an emergency: 140 in obstruction and 35 with tumour perforation, compared with 1 patient with tumour perforation in the elective group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The emergency group had higher rates of postoperative complications (59.1% vs 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), increased 90-day mortality (13.7% vs 1.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (5 vs 10 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). From the emergency cohort only 29.2% of eligible patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and in multivariate regression analysis emergency presentation was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.26 [0.14-0.47], <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both short- and long-term outcomes after emergency presentation of RCC are poor, with inadequate access to subsequent chemotherapy. Strategies addressing emergency presentations of left-sided tumours have moved towards temporisation and elective surgery. Delaying major resectional surgery for optimisation may improve outcomes and access to adjuvant therapies for RCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:多达 30% 的结直肠癌患者是急诊病人,其预后比择期手术病人差。与左侧结肠癌相比,对右侧结肠癌的研究明显不足。我们试图比较急诊和择期就诊的右侧结肠癌(RCC)患者的癌症护理质量和临床疗效:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日期间所有接受手术治疗的 RCC 患者。从电子病历中收集数据,并对急诊和择期手术组群的宿主和肿瘤因素以及结果进行比较:共纳入806名患者(中位年龄72岁)。约175名患者(22%)为急诊患者:140名患者出现梗阻,35名患者出现肿瘤穿孔,而择期手术组仅有1名患者出现肿瘤穿孔(P < 0.001)。急诊组的术后并发症发生率更高(59.1% 对 20.0%,p < 0.001),90 天死亡率更高(13.7% 对 1.3%,p < 0.001),住院时间更长(5 天对 10 天,p < 0.001)。在急诊队列中,只有29.2%的合格患者接受了辅助化疗,而在多变量回归分析中,急诊就诊与接受辅助化疗的可能性降低有关(几率比0.26 [0.14-0.47],P < 0.001):结论:RCC急诊就诊后的短期和长期疗效均不佳,且后续化疗机会不足。应对左侧肿瘤急诊的策略已转向暂时性和择期手术。推迟大部切除手术以进行优化可能会改善RCC的预后和获得辅助治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Process and outcome differences in the care of patients undergoing elective and emergency right hemicolectomy.

Introduction: Up to 30% of patients with colorectal cancer present as an emergency and have worse outcomes than elective patients. Compared with left-sided cancers, malignancies arising in the right colon are significantly under-researched. We sought to compare cancer care quality and clinical outcomes between emergency and elective presentations of right-sided colon cancer (RCC).

Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study included all patients who underwent operative management for a RCC, from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2022. Data were collected from electronic patient records, and host and tumour factors as well as outcomes between emergency and elective cohorts were compared.

Results: Overall, 806 patients (median age 72 years) were included. Some 175 patients (22%) presented as an emergency: 140 in obstruction and 35 with tumour perforation, compared with 1 patient with tumour perforation in the elective group (p < 0.001). The emergency group had higher rates of postoperative complications (59.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.001), increased 90-day mortality (13.7% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (5 vs 10 days, p < 0.001). From the emergency cohort only 29.2% of eligible patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and in multivariate regression analysis emergency presentation was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.26 [0.14-0.47], p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Both short- and long-term outcomes after emergency presentation of RCC are poor, with inadequate access to subsequent chemotherapy. Strategies addressing emergency presentations of left-sided tumours have moved towards temporisation and elective surgery. Delaying major resectional surgery for optimisation may improve outcomes and access to adjuvant therapies for RCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
期刊最新文献
Impact of endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy on lower oesophageal sphincter physiology. Kommerell's diverticulum: an unusual cause of unilateral vocal cord palsy? The novel use of a vacuum-assisted closure dressing in the management of Fournier's gangrene. Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool. A new setup for single surgeon paediatric supracondylar fracture pinning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1