对尼泊尔安全堕胎路线图的批判性分析。

Jagadishwor Ghimire, Sanju Maharjan, Pratikshya Kattel, Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Bibek Kumar Lal, Nisha Joshi, Gauri Pradhan Shrestha, Archana Suwal, Ojasbi Bhattarai, Suruchi Shahi, Manish Gautam, Navaraj Bhattarai, Suresh Mehata, Bhogendra Raj Dotel, Sujan Karki
{"title":"对尼泊尔安全堕胎路线图的批判性分析。","authors":"Jagadishwor Ghimire, Sanju Maharjan, Pratikshya Kattel, Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Bibek Kumar Lal, Nisha Joshi, Gauri Pradhan Shrestha, Archana Suwal, Ojasbi Bhattarai, Suruchi Shahi, Manish Gautam, Navaraj Bhattarai, Suresh Mehata, Bhogendra Raj Dotel, Sujan Karki","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abortion was legalized by the 2002 Muluki Ain to combat the surging rates of maternal mortality and morbidity. By 2021, the Maternal Mortality Rate plummeted to 151 from 539 in 1996. The decline in the abortion-related maternal mortality attributes to the implication of progressive abortion policies that includes expanded safe abortion services introduction of medical abortion, constitutional recognition of abortion, the mandates by Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act, and free-of-cost abortion services in government health facilities. This review study delves into exploring the contemporary abortion policies and its implications on women's access to safe abortion services as well as the factors that affect the access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study incorporates findings from extensive desk review of abortion services in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2021 safe abortion services Program Implementation Guideline aims to expand safe abortion sites; however, the Nepal's challenging geography ensues its inequitable distribution, especially in mountainous area. Policy provisions on information and financial accessibility to abortion are well navigated by the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act and regulation but consistent to sporadic gaps in its implementation were comprehended in this study. This paper further discussed the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act's regressive mandate of 28-week gestational limit at any condition and the role of gender in abortion decision-making under the pretext of factors influencing safe abortion services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review study recommends strategies: improving capacity for abortion services under federalism, combating stigma, improving the private sector's readiness, and building a resilient health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 1","pages":"199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Analysis of Safe Abortion Road Map in Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Jagadishwor Ghimire, Sanju Maharjan, Pratikshya Kattel, Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Bibek Kumar Lal, Nisha Joshi, Gauri Pradhan Shrestha, Archana Suwal, Ojasbi Bhattarai, Suruchi Shahi, Manish Gautam, Navaraj Bhattarai, Suresh Mehata, Bhogendra Raj Dotel, Sujan Karki\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abortion was legalized by the 2002 Muluki Ain to combat the surging rates of maternal mortality and morbidity. By 2021, the Maternal Mortality Rate plummeted to 151 from 539 in 1996. The decline in the abortion-related maternal mortality attributes to the implication of progressive abortion policies that includes expanded safe abortion services introduction of medical abortion, constitutional recognition of abortion, the mandates by Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act, and free-of-cost abortion services in government health facilities. This review study delves into exploring the contemporary abortion policies and its implications on women's access to safe abortion services as well as the factors that affect the access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study incorporates findings from extensive desk review of abortion services in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2021 safe abortion services Program Implementation Guideline aims to expand safe abortion sites; however, the Nepal's challenging geography ensues its inequitable distribution, especially in mountainous area. Policy provisions on information and financial accessibility to abortion are well navigated by the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act and regulation but consistent to sporadic gaps in its implementation were comprehended in this study. This paper further discussed the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act's regressive mandate of 28-week gestational limit at any condition and the role of gender in abortion decision-making under the pretext of factors influencing safe abortion services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review study recommends strategies: improving capacity for abortion services under federalism, combating stigma, improving the private sector's readiness, and building a resilient health system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"199-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2002 年的《穆卢基协议》将堕胎合法化,以应对急剧上升的孕产妇死亡率和发病率。到 2021 年,孕产妇死亡率从 1996 年的 539 人骤降至 151 人。与堕胎相关的孕产妇死亡率的下降归因于渐进式堕胎政策的影响,包括扩大安全堕胎服务、引入医疗堕胎、宪法承认堕胎、《安全孕产和生殖健康权利法》的规定以及政府卫生机构提供免费堕胎服务。本审查研究深入探讨了当代堕胎政策及其对妇女获得安全堕胎服务的影响,以及影响获得安全堕胎服务的因素:本研究纳入了对尼泊尔人工流产服务的广泛案头审查结果:2021 年安全堕胎服务计划实施指南》旨在扩大安全堕胎场所;然而,尼泊尔极具挑战性的地理环境导致安全堕胎场所分布不均,尤其是在山区。安全孕产和生殖健康权利法案》和法规对流产信息和资金可及性的政策规定进行了很好的引导,但本研究了解到在其实施过程中仍存在零星的差距。本文进一步讨论了《安全孕产和生殖健康权利法》规定的任何情况下 28 周妊娠限制的倒退规定,以及在影响安全堕胎服务的因素的借口下,性别在堕胎决策中的作用:审查研究建议采取以下战略:提高联邦制下的堕胎服务能力,消除耻辱感,提高私营部门的准备程度,以及建立一个有弹性的卫生系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Analysis of Safe Abortion Road Map in Nepal.

Background: Abortion was legalized by the 2002 Muluki Ain to combat the surging rates of maternal mortality and morbidity. By 2021, the Maternal Mortality Rate plummeted to 151 from 539 in 1996. The decline in the abortion-related maternal mortality attributes to the implication of progressive abortion policies that includes expanded safe abortion services introduction of medical abortion, constitutional recognition of abortion, the mandates by Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act, and free-of-cost abortion services in government health facilities. This review study delves into exploring the contemporary abortion policies and its implications on women's access to safe abortion services as well as the factors that affect the access.

Methods: This study incorporates findings from extensive desk review of abortion services in Nepal.

Results: The 2021 safe abortion services Program Implementation Guideline aims to expand safe abortion sites; however, the Nepal's challenging geography ensues its inequitable distribution, especially in mountainous area. Policy provisions on information and financial accessibility to abortion are well navigated by the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act and regulation but consistent to sporadic gaps in its implementation were comprehended in this study. This paper further discussed the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights Act's regressive mandate of 28-week gestational limit at any condition and the role of gender in abortion decision-making under the pretext of factors influencing safe abortion services.

Conclusions: The review study recommends strategies: improving capacity for abortion services under federalism, combating stigma, improving the private sector's readiness, and building a resilient health system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile of Peripheral Artery Disease of Patients Attending Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, Janakpurdham, Nepal. Clinical Profile of posterior segment in high Myopia. Clinical Profile of Thoracoscopic Bullectomy in Treatment of Pneumothorax. Comparison of Lintula Score with Modified Alvarado Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults. Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1