阿米替林、普瑞巴林和度洛西汀用于治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变。

Richa Nepal, Manil Ratna Bajracharya, Budda Bahadur Karki, Dipak Mall, Prajaya Shikhar Shrestha, Kushal Prasad Wasti, Anjal Bisht
{"title":"阿米替林、普瑞巴林和度洛西汀用于治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变。","authors":"Richa Nepal, Manil Ratna Bajracharya, Budda Bahadur Karki, Dipak Mall, Prajaya Shikhar Shrestha, Kushal Prasad Wasti, Anjal Bisht","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.5120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the frequent presenting complaints in diabetes and endocrine clinics. Our main objective was to compare effectiveness of three commonly prescribed drugs: amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine for treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a comparative, prospective, observational study conducted among 99 diabetic patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy having numeric rating pain scale ≥ 4. Thirty-three patients in each group were consecutively prescribed amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine in lower dose (10mg/75mg/20mg) for first two weeks to gradually up titrate to higher dose (25mg/150mg/30mg) as per pain response for total duration of eight weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of eight weeks, 84.9% in amitriptyline, 78.7% in pregabalin and 60.6% in duloxetine group had adequate pain reduction in form of mild or no pain. Among total patients, 42.5% patients had severe pain at baseline that decreased to 5% by the end of our study. Out of three drugs, 45.5% patients in amitriptyline group had complete resolution of pain as compared to 24.2% in pregabalin and 18.2% in duloxetine group (p value 0.05). Drowsiness (42.4%), dizziness (21.2%) and dry mouth (21.2%) were the commonest side effects among total participants in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine were all associated with adequate pain reduction among patients of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in our study, however, amitriptyline had more favorable findings with tolerable side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 1","pages":"185-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amitriptyline, Pregabalin and Duloxetine for Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Richa Nepal, Manil Ratna Bajracharya, Budda Bahadur Karki, Dipak Mall, Prajaya Shikhar Shrestha, Kushal Prasad Wasti, Anjal Bisht\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.5120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the frequent presenting complaints in diabetes and endocrine clinics. Our main objective was to compare effectiveness of three commonly prescribed drugs: amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine for treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a comparative, prospective, observational study conducted among 99 diabetic patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy having numeric rating pain scale ≥ 4. Thirty-three patients in each group were consecutively prescribed amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine in lower dose (10mg/75mg/20mg) for first two weeks to gradually up titrate to higher dose (25mg/150mg/30mg) as per pain response for total duration of eight weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of eight weeks, 84.9% in amitriptyline, 78.7% in pregabalin and 60.6% in duloxetine group had adequate pain reduction in form of mild or no pain. Among total patients, 42.5% patients had severe pain at baseline that decreased to 5% by the end of our study. Out of three drugs, 45.5% patients in amitriptyline group had complete resolution of pain as compared to 24.2% in pregabalin and 18.2% in duloxetine group (p value 0.05). Drowsiness (42.4%), dizziness (21.2%) and dry mouth (21.2%) were the commonest side effects among total participants in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine were all associated with adequate pain reduction among patients of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in our study, however, amitriptyline had more favorable findings with tolerable side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"185-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.5120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.5120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病周围神经病变疼痛是糖尿病和内分泌门诊的常见主诉之一。我们的主要目的是比较三种常用处方药:阿米替林、普瑞巴林和度洛西汀治疗糖尿病周围神经病变疼痛的疗效:这是一项比较性、前瞻性、观察性研究,研究对象是 99 名患有糖尿病周围神经病变疼痛且疼痛程度≥ 4 级的糖尿病患者。每组 33 名患者连续服用阿米替林、普瑞巴林和度洛西汀,头两周服用低剂量(10 毫克/75 毫克/20 毫克),然后根据疼痛反应逐渐增加剂量(25 毫克/150 毫克/30 毫克),共持续 8 周:八周结束时,84.9%的阿米替林患者、78.7%的普瑞巴林患者和60.6%的度洛西汀患者的疼痛得到了充分缓解,表现为轻微疼痛或无疼痛。在所有患者中,42.5%的患者在基线时疼痛剧烈,而在研究结束时疼痛剧烈的比例下降到 5%。在三种药物中,阿米替林组 45.5%的患者疼痛完全缓解,而普瑞巴林组和度洛西汀组分别为 24.2%和 18.2%(P 值 0.05)。嗜睡(42.4%)、头晕(21.2%)和口干(21.2%)是本研究中最常见的副作用:结论:在我们的研究中,阿米替林、普瑞巴林和度洛西汀都能充分减轻糖尿病周围神经病变患者的疼痛,但阿米替林的疗效更佳,且副作用可以忍受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Amitriptyline, Pregabalin and Duloxetine for Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

Background: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the frequent presenting complaints in diabetes and endocrine clinics. Our main objective was to compare effectiveness of three commonly prescribed drugs: amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine for treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Methods: This was a comparative, prospective, observational study conducted among 99 diabetic patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy having numeric rating pain scale ≥ 4. Thirty-three patients in each group were consecutively prescribed amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine in lower dose (10mg/75mg/20mg) for first two weeks to gradually up titrate to higher dose (25mg/150mg/30mg) as per pain response for total duration of eight weeks.

Results: At the end of eight weeks, 84.9% in amitriptyline, 78.7% in pregabalin and 60.6% in duloxetine group had adequate pain reduction in form of mild or no pain. Among total patients, 42.5% patients had severe pain at baseline that decreased to 5% by the end of our study. Out of three drugs, 45.5% patients in amitriptyline group had complete resolution of pain as compared to 24.2% in pregabalin and 18.2% in duloxetine group (p value 0.05). Drowsiness (42.4%), dizziness (21.2%) and dry mouth (21.2%) were the commonest side effects among total participants in our study.

Conclusions: Amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine were all associated with adequate pain reduction among patients of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in our study, however, amitriptyline had more favorable findings with tolerable side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile of Peripheral Artery Disease of Patients Attending Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, Janakpurdham, Nepal. Clinical Profile of posterior segment in high Myopia. Clinical Profile of Thoracoscopic Bullectomy in Treatment of Pneumothorax. Comparison of Lintula Score with Modified Alvarado Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults. Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1