韩国护理专业学生在模拟训练汇报前后反思水平的比较分析:定性分析设计。

Q3 Medicine Child Health Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.4094/chnr.2024.015
Sun-Young Lim, Mi-Jeong Bae
{"title":"韩国护理专业学生在模拟训练汇报前后反思水平的比较分析:定性分析设计。","authors":"Sun-Young Lim, Mi-Jeong Bae","doi":"10.4094/chnr.2024.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure the level of reflection, this study analyzes diaries written by third-year nursing students before and after the debriefing stage in simulation training. A qualitative study using diary entries from 15 nursing students to explore reflection depth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students engaged in simulation training and the debriefing stage, documenting their reflections in diaries. Before and after debriefing, reflections were rated from Level 1 (reflectivity) to Level 7 (theoretical reflectivity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of reflection levels rose significantly from 545 to 829 post-debriefing, enhancing higher-order reflection.The shift signifies a move from superficial to deep reflection, highlighting debriefing's role in fostering critical thinking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the critical role of debriefing in enhancing reflective thinking in nursing education. There is a demonstrated need for further research into the specific elements of debriefing that are most effective at promoting deep reflection. Future studies should conduct comparative analyses of different debriefing methods and approaches across various educational settings. This research could lay the foundation for designing more effective debriefing strategies that foster critical thinking and improve learning outcomes in nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":37360,"journal":{"name":"Child Health Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of nursing students' reflection levels before and after debriefing in simulation training in South Korea: qualitative analysis design.\",\"authors\":\"Sun-Young Lim, Mi-Jeong Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.4094/chnr.2024.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure the level of reflection, this study analyzes diaries written by third-year nursing students before and after the debriefing stage in simulation training. A qualitative study using diary entries from 15 nursing students to explore reflection depth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students engaged in simulation training and the debriefing stage, documenting their reflections in diaries. Before and after debriefing, reflections were rated from Level 1 (reflectivity) to Level 7 (theoretical reflectivity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of reflection levels rose significantly from 545 to 829 post-debriefing, enhancing higher-order reflection.The shift signifies a move from superficial to deep reflection, highlighting debriefing's role in fostering critical thinking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the critical role of debriefing in enhancing reflective thinking in nursing education. There is a demonstrated need for further research into the specific elements of debriefing that are most effective at promoting deep reflection. Future studies should conduct comparative analyses of different debriefing methods and approaches across various educational settings. This research could lay the foundation for designing more effective debriefing strategies that foster critical thinking and improve learning outcomes in nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Health Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Health Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2024.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Health Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2024.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了衡量学生的反思水平,本研究分析了护理专业三年级学生在模拟训练汇报阶段前后所写的日记。采用 15 名护理专业学生的日记进行定性研究,探讨反思的深度:方法:学生参与模拟训练和汇报阶段,在日记中记录他们的反思。在汇报之前和之后,对反思进行评级,从 1 级(反思性)到 7 级(理论反思性):结果:汇报后的反思等级总数从 545 级大幅上升至 829 级,加强了高阶反思。这一转变标志着反思从肤浅走向深刻,凸显了汇报在培养批判性思维方面的作用:研究结果强调了汇报在加强护理教育中的反思性思维方面的关键作用。显然,有必要进一步研究能最有效促进深度反思的汇报的具体内容。未来的研究应该对不同教育环境下的不同汇报方式和方法进行比较分析。这项研究可为设计更有效的汇报策略奠定基础,从而促进护理教育中的批判性思维并提高学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of nursing students' reflection levels before and after debriefing in simulation training in South Korea: qualitative analysis design.

Purpose: To measure the level of reflection, this study analyzes diaries written by third-year nursing students before and after the debriefing stage in simulation training. A qualitative study using diary entries from 15 nursing students to explore reflection depth.

Methods: Students engaged in simulation training and the debriefing stage, documenting their reflections in diaries. Before and after debriefing, reflections were rated from Level 1 (reflectivity) to Level 7 (theoretical reflectivity).

Results: The total number of reflection levels rose significantly from 545 to 829 post-debriefing, enhancing higher-order reflection.The shift signifies a move from superficial to deep reflection, highlighting debriefing's role in fostering critical thinking.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the critical role of debriefing in enhancing reflective thinking in nursing education. There is a demonstrated need for further research into the specific elements of debriefing that are most effective at promoting deep reflection. Future studies should conduct comparative analyses of different debriefing methods and approaches across various educational settings. This research could lay the foundation for designing more effective debriefing strategies that foster critical thinking and improve learning outcomes in nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Health Nursing Research
Child Health Nursing Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of nursing students' reflection levels before and after debriefing in simulation training in South Korea: qualitative analysis design. Evaluation of a child abuse prevention program for unmarried mothers in South Korea: a single-case experimental design. Incidence of falls and fall-related characteristics in hospitalized children in South Korea: a descriptive study. South Korean first-time mothers' knowledge of digestive health problems in infancy and their utilization of health care facilities for digestive health concerns: a descriptive study. What makes a good reviewer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1