在一个拥有全民公共卫生系统的国家,基于远程医疗验光评估筛查糖尿病视网膜病变的成本效益。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0353
Sara Ortiz-Toquero, Guillermo Aleixandre, Yolanda Valpuesta, Cristina Perez Fernandez, Purificación de la Iglesia, Jose Carlos Pastor, Maribel Lopez-Galvez
{"title":"在一个拥有全民公共卫生系统的国家,基于远程医疗验光评估筛查糖尿病视网膜病变的成本效益。","authors":"Sara Ortiz-Toquero, Guillermo Aleixandre, Yolanda Valpuesta, Cristina Perez Fernandez, Purificación de la Iglesia, Jose Carlos Pastor, Maribel Lopez-Galvez","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To determine the cost-effectiveness of a new telemedicine optometric-based screening program of diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with traditional models' assessments in a universal European public health system. <b>Methods:</b> A new teleophthalmology program for DR based on the assessment of retinographies (3-field Joslin Vision Network by a certified optometrist and a reading center [IOBA-RC]) was designed. This program was first conducted in a rural area 40 km from the referral hospital (Medina de Rioseco, Valladolid, Spain). The cost-effectiveness was compared with telemedicine based on evaluations by primary care physicians and general ophthalmologists, and to face-to-face examinations conducted by ophthalmologists. A decision tree model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of both models, considering public and private costs. The effectiveness was measured in terms of quality of life. <b>Results:</b> A total of 261 patients with type 2 diabetes were included (42 had significant DR and required specific surveillance by the RC; 219 were undiagnosed). The sensitivity and specificity of the detection of DR were 100% and 74.1%, respectively. The telemedicine-based DR optometric screening model demonstrated similar utility to models based on physicians and general ophthalmologists and traditional face-to-face evaluations (0.845) at a lower cost/patient (€51.23, €71.65, and €86.46, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> The telemedicine-based optometric screening program for DR in a RC demonstrated cost savings even in a developed country with a universal health care system. These results support the expansion of this kind of teleophthalmology program not only for screening but also for the follow-up of diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"2824-2833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of a Telemedicine Optometric-Based Assessment for Screening Diabetic Retinopathy in a Country with a Universal Public Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Ortiz-Toquero, Guillermo Aleixandre, Yolanda Valpuesta, Cristina Perez Fernandez, Purificación de la Iglesia, Jose Carlos Pastor, Maribel Lopez-Galvez\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To determine the cost-effectiveness of a new telemedicine optometric-based screening program of diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with traditional models' assessments in a universal European public health system. <b>Methods:</b> A new teleophthalmology program for DR based on the assessment of retinographies (3-field Joslin Vision Network by a certified optometrist and a reading center [IOBA-RC]) was designed. This program was first conducted in a rural area 40 km from the referral hospital (Medina de Rioseco, Valladolid, Spain). The cost-effectiveness was compared with telemedicine based on evaluations by primary care physicians and general ophthalmologists, and to face-to-face examinations conducted by ophthalmologists. A decision tree model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of both models, considering public and private costs. The effectiveness was measured in terms of quality of life. <b>Results:</b> A total of 261 patients with type 2 diabetes were included (42 had significant DR and required specific surveillance by the RC; 219 were undiagnosed). The sensitivity and specificity of the detection of DR were 100% and 74.1%, respectively. The telemedicine-based DR optometric screening model demonstrated similar utility to models based on physicians and general ophthalmologists and traditional face-to-face evaluations (0.845) at a lower cost/patient (€51.23, €71.65, and €86.46, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> The telemedicine-based optometric screening program for DR in a RC demonstrated cost savings even in a developed country with a universal health care system. These results support the expansion of this kind of teleophthalmology program not only for screening but also for the follow-up of diabetic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2824-2833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定在欧洲公共卫生系统中,与传统模式的评估相比,基于远程医学验光的新型糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查项目的成本效益。方法:设计了一项基于视网膜图评估的新型 DR 远程眼科检查项目(由认证验光师和阅片中心 [IOBA-RC] 进行三视场乔斯林视力网络评估)。该项目首先在距离转诊医院(西班牙巴利亚多利德的梅迪纳-德里奥塞科)40 公里的农村地区开展。根据初级保健医生和普通眼科医生的评估,比较了远程医疗和眼科医生面对面检查的成本效益。考虑到公共和私人成本,我们开发了一个决策树模型来模拟两种模式的成本效益。有效性以生活质量为衡量标准。研究结果共纳入了 261 名 2 型糖尿病患者(其中 42 人有明显的 DR,需要接受 RC 的特殊监测;219 人未确诊)。DR 检测的灵敏度和特异度分别为 100%和 74.1%。基于远程医疗的 DR 视力筛查模式与基于内科医生和普通眼科医生的模式以及传统的面对面评估模式(0.845)具有相似的效用,但每名患者的成本较低(分别为 51.23 欧元、71.65 欧元和 86.46 欧元)。结论即使是在一个拥有全民医疗保健系统的发达国家,基于远程医疗的视力筛查计划也能节省成本。这些结果支持扩大这种远程眼科项目,不仅用于筛查,还用于糖尿病患者的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-Effectiveness of a Telemedicine Optometric-Based Assessment for Screening Diabetic Retinopathy in a Country with a Universal Public Health System.

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a new telemedicine optometric-based screening program of diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with traditional models' assessments in a universal European public health system. Methods: A new teleophthalmology program for DR based on the assessment of retinographies (3-field Joslin Vision Network by a certified optometrist and a reading center [IOBA-RC]) was designed. This program was first conducted in a rural area 40 km from the referral hospital (Medina de Rioseco, Valladolid, Spain). The cost-effectiveness was compared with telemedicine based on evaluations by primary care physicians and general ophthalmologists, and to face-to-face examinations conducted by ophthalmologists. A decision tree model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of both models, considering public and private costs. The effectiveness was measured in terms of quality of life. Results: A total of 261 patients with type 2 diabetes were included (42 had significant DR and required specific surveillance by the RC; 219 were undiagnosed). The sensitivity and specificity of the detection of DR were 100% and 74.1%, respectively. The telemedicine-based DR optometric screening model demonstrated similar utility to models based on physicians and general ophthalmologists and traditional face-to-face evaluations (0.845) at a lower cost/patient (€51.23, €71.65, and €86.46, respectively). Conclusions: The telemedicine-based optometric screening program for DR in a RC demonstrated cost savings even in a developed country with a universal health care system. These results support the expansion of this kind of teleophthalmology program not only for screening but also for the follow-up of diabetic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
When Are Single Reader Evaluations Insufficient in Teledermoscopic Assessments? Analyses of a Retrospective Cohort Study. Same as It Ever Was. A Systematic Review of Telemedicine Solutions to Provide Psychological Interventions for Women Receiving Fertility Treatments. Experience of The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network. Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1