在 ChatGPT 中使用知识引导检索增强技术进行罕见疾病诊断。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104702
Charlotte Zelin , Wendy K. Chung , Mederic Jeanne , Gongbo Zhang , Chunhua Weng
{"title":"在 ChatGPT 中使用知识引导检索增强技术进行罕见疾病诊断。","authors":"Charlotte Zelin ,&nbsp;Wendy K. Chung ,&nbsp;Mederic Jeanne ,&nbsp;Gongbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunhua Weng","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although rare diseases individually have a low prevalence, they collectively affect nearly 400 million individuals around the world. On average, it takes five years for an accurate rare disease diagnosis, but many patients remain undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. As machine learning technologies have been used to aid diagnostics in the past, this study aims to test ChatGPT’s suitability for rare disease diagnostic support with the enhancement provided by Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). RareDxGPT, our enhanced ChatGPT model, supplies ChatGPT with information about 717 rare diseases from an external knowledge resource, the RareDis Corpus, through RAG. In RareDxGPT, when a query is entered, the three documents most relevant to the query in the RareDis Corpus are retrieved. Along with the query, they are returned to ChatGPT to provide a diagnosis. Additionally, phenotypes for thirty different diseases were extracted from free text from PubMed’s Case Reports. They were each entered with three different prompt types: “prompt”, “prompt + explanation” and “prompt + role play.” The accuracy of ChatGPT and RareDxGPT with each prompt was then measured. With “Prompt”, RareDxGPT had a 40 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 37 % of the cases correct. With “Prompt + Explanation”, RareDxGPT had a 43 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 23 % of the cases correct. With “Prompt + Role Play”, RareDxGPT had a 40 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 23 % of the cases correct. To conclude, ChatGPT, especially when supplying extra domain specific knowledge, demonstrates early potential for rare disease diagnosis with adjustments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rare disease diagnosis using knowledge guided retrieval augmentation for ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Zelin ,&nbsp;Wendy K. Chung ,&nbsp;Mederic Jeanne ,&nbsp;Gongbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunhua Weng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although rare diseases individually have a low prevalence, they collectively affect nearly 400 million individuals around the world. On average, it takes five years for an accurate rare disease diagnosis, but many patients remain undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. As machine learning technologies have been used to aid diagnostics in the past, this study aims to test ChatGPT’s suitability for rare disease diagnostic support with the enhancement provided by Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). RareDxGPT, our enhanced ChatGPT model, supplies ChatGPT with information about 717 rare diseases from an external knowledge resource, the RareDis Corpus, through RAG. In RareDxGPT, when a query is entered, the three documents most relevant to the query in the RareDis Corpus are retrieved. Along with the query, they are returned to ChatGPT to provide a diagnosis. Additionally, phenotypes for thirty different diseases were extracted from free text from PubMed’s Case Reports. They were each entered with three different prompt types: “prompt”, “prompt + explanation” and “prompt + role play.” The accuracy of ChatGPT and RareDxGPT with each prompt was then measured. With “Prompt”, RareDxGPT had a 40 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 37 % of the cases correct. With “Prompt + Explanation”, RareDxGPT had a 43 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 23 % of the cases correct. With “Prompt + Role Play”, RareDxGPT had a 40 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 23 % of the cases correct. To conclude, ChatGPT, especially when supplying extra domain specific knowledge, demonstrates early potential for rare disease diagnosis with adjustments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然罕见病的单个发病率很低,但它们总共影响着全球近 4 亿人。平均而言,罕见病的准确诊断需要五年时间,但许多患者仍未得到诊断或被误诊。由于机器学习技术过去曾被用于辅助诊断,本研究旨在测试 ChatGPT 在检索增强生成(RAG)技术的增强下是否适用于罕见病诊断支持。RareDxGPT 是我们的增强型 ChatGPT 模型,它通过 RAG 从外部知识资源 RareDis 语料库中为 ChatGPT 提供了 717 种罕见病的信息。在 RareDxGPT 中,当输入一个查询时,RareDis 语料库中与该查询最相关的三个文档将被检索出来。它们与查询一起返回到 ChatGPT,以提供诊断结果。此外,还从 PubMed 病例报告的自由文本中提取了 30 种不同疾病的表型。每种疾病都有三种不同的提示类型:"提示"、"提示+解释 "和 "提示+角色扮演"。然后测量了 ChatGPT 和 RareDxGPT 对每种提示的准确性。使用 "提示 "时,RareDxGPT 的准确率为 40%,而 ChatGPT 3.5 的正确率为 37%。使用 "提示+解释 "时,RareDxGPT 的准确率为 43%,而 ChatGPT 3.5 的正确率为 23%。使用 "提示+角色扮演 "时,RareDxGPT 的正确率为 40%,而 ChatGPT 3.5 的正确率为 23%。总之,ChatGPT,尤其是在提供额外的特定领域知识时,展示了通过调整进行罕见病诊断的早期潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rare disease diagnosis using knowledge guided retrieval augmentation for ChatGPT

Although rare diseases individually have a low prevalence, they collectively affect nearly 400 million individuals around the world. On average, it takes five years for an accurate rare disease diagnosis, but many patients remain undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. As machine learning technologies have been used to aid diagnostics in the past, this study aims to test ChatGPT’s suitability for rare disease diagnostic support with the enhancement provided by Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). RareDxGPT, our enhanced ChatGPT model, supplies ChatGPT with information about 717 rare diseases from an external knowledge resource, the RareDis Corpus, through RAG. In RareDxGPT, when a query is entered, the three documents most relevant to the query in the RareDis Corpus are retrieved. Along with the query, they are returned to ChatGPT to provide a diagnosis. Additionally, phenotypes for thirty different diseases were extracted from free text from PubMed’s Case Reports. They were each entered with three different prompt types: “prompt”, “prompt + explanation” and “prompt + role play.” The accuracy of ChatGPT and RareDxGPT with each prompt was then measured. With “Prompt”, RareDxGPT had a 40 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 37 % of the cases correct. With “Prompt + Explanation”, RareDxGPT had a 43 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 23 % of the cases correct. With “Prompt + Role Play”, RareDxGPT had a 40 % accuracy, while ChatGPT 3.5 got 23 % of the cases correct. To conclude, ChatGPT, especially when supplying extra domain specific knowledge, demonstrates early potential for rare disease diagnosis with adjustments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
Early multi-cancer detection through deep learning: An anomaly detection approach using Variational Autoencoder. Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data. Cross-Modal self-supervised vision language pre-training with multiple objectives for medical visual question answering Machine learning approaches for the discovery of clinical pathways from patient data: A systematic review MultiADE: A Multi-domain benchmark for Adverse Drug Event extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1