对年轻体健的复杂腹主动脉瘤和胸腹主动脉瘤进行栅栏式和分支式血管内动脉瘤修补术的长期效果。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.090
Ciro Ferrer, Enrico Gallitto, Ottavia Borghese, Marcello Lodato, Antonio Cappiello, Piergiorgio Cao, Mauro Gargiulo, Rocco Giudice
{"title":"对年轻体健的复杂腹主动脉瘤和胸腹主动脉瘤进行栅栏式和分支式血管内动脉瘤修补术的长期效果。","authors":"Ciro Ferrer, Enrico Gallitto, Ottavia Borghese, Marcello Lodato, Antonio Cappiello, Piergiorgio Cao, Mauro Gargiulo, Rocco Giudice","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAa) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with fenestrated and branched devices (F/BEVAR) represents the first-line treatment in old or unfit patients. Currently, the widespread diffusion of these techniques has led to a progressive increase of complex endovascular procedures also in younger and fitter patients, but the related results have been only minimally reported, without long-term data. We investigated the long-term results of F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA repair in young and fit patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients, aged ≤70 years, who underwent F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA over the last 13 years at two tertiary institutions were included in the study. All subjects presented a low to intermediate risk according to the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical comorbidity grading system. The primary end points were technical and clinical success and late overall and aortic-related survival. Major complications and specific target vessel-related outcomes were investigated as secondary end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 patients (155 males [84.7%]; mean age, 64.5 ± 5.7 years; range, 33-70 years) underwent F/BEVAR during the study period, for a total of 167 degenerative (91.3%) and 16 postdissection (8.7%) aneurysms, including 44 (24%) juxtarenal, 33 (18%) pararenal, and 106 (58%) TAAAs. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 176 patients (96.2%) and 171 patients (93.4%), respectively. Four patients (2.2%) died perioperatively, of which two (1.1%) operated in emergency. Postoperatively, five patients (2.7%) presented permanent grade 3 spinal cord injury and three (1.6%) renal failure needing permanent dialysis. The mean follow-up was 65.7 ± 39.6 months (range, 1-158 months). The estimated overall and aortic-related survival at 12, 60, and 120 months was 94.0%, 85.1%, 72.2%, and 97.8%, 97.8%, 96.2%, respectively, and reintervention and branch instability-free survival at the same time points were 84.4%, 71.8%, 71.8%, and 93.2%, 86.3%, 72.2%, respectively. An aneurysm growth of >5 mm was detected in six patients (3.3%), and a sac shrinkage of >5 mm was achieved in 118 cases (64.5%). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated the need for unplanned procedure as the only risk factor for overall mortality (odds ratio, 3.331; 95% confidence interval, 1.397-7.940; P < .01].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>F/BEVAR in young and fit patients led to low perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates and a favorable overall survival rate in the long-term, making this technique particularly appealing in such a subgroup of patients. The availability of long-term data derived from the results of young patients, may additionally provide helpful information to redefine the indications for treatment and allow future targeted device and technique improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1639-1649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term results of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in young and fit patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ciro Ferrer, Enrico Gallitto, Ottavia Borghese, Marcello Lodato, Antonio Cappiello, Piergiorgio Cao, Mauro Gargiulo, Rocco Giudice\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAa) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with fenestrated and branched devices (F/BEVAR) represents the first-line treatment in old or unfit patients. Currently, the widespread diffusion of these techniques has led to a progressive increase of complex endovascular procedures also in younger and fitter patients, but the related results have been only minimally reported, without long-term data. We investigated the long-term results of F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA repair in young and fit patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients, aged ≤70 years, who underwent F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA over the last 13 years at two tertiary institutions were included in the study. All subjects presented a low to intermediate risk according to the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical comorbidity grading system. The primary end points were technical and clinical success and late overall and aortic-related survival. Major complications and specific target vessel-related outcomes were investigated as secondary end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 patients (155 males [84.7%]; mean age, 64.5 ± 5.7 years; range, 33-70 years) underwent F/BEVAR during the study period, for a total of 167 degenerative (91.3%) and 16 postdissection (8.7%) aneurysms, including 44 (24%) juxtarenal, 33 (18%) pararenal, and 106 (58%) TAAAs. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 176 patients (96.2%) and 171 patients (93.4%), respectively. Four patients (2.2%) died perioperatively, of which two (1.1%) operated in emergency. Postoperatively, five patients (2.7%) presented permanent grade 3 spinal cord injury and three (1.6%) renal failure needing permanent dialysis. The mean follow-up was 65.7 ± 39.6 months (range, 1-158 months). The estimated overall and aortic-related survival at 12, 60, and 120 months was 94.0%, 85.1%, 72.2%, and 97.8%, 97.8%, 96.2%, respectively, and reintervention and branch instability-free survival at the same time points were 84.4%, 71.8%, 71.8%, and 93.2%, 86.3%, 72.2%, respectively. An aneurysm growth of >5 mm was detected in six patients (3.3%), and a sac shrinkage of >5 mm was achieved in 118 cases (64.5%). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated the need for unplanned procedure as the only risk factor for overall mortality (odds ratio, 3.331; 95% confidence interval, 1.397-7.940; P < .01].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>F/BEVAR in young and fit patients led to low perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates and a favorable overall survival rate in the long-term, making this technique particularly appealing in such a subgroup of patients. The availability of long-term data derived from the results of young patients, may additionally provide helpful information to redefine the indications for treatment and allow future targeted device and technique improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1639-1649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用栅栏式和分支式装置(F/BEVAR)对复杂腹主动脉瘤(CAAA)和胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)进行血管内修复是老年或体质较差患者的一线治疗方法。目前,随着这些技术的广泛传播,年轻和体质较好的患者也开始接受复杂的血管内手术,但相关结果的报道却很少,也没有长期数据。我们研究了年轻且身体健康的患者接受 F/BEVAR 进行 CAAA 和 TAAA 修复的长期效果:研究纳入了过去13年中在两家三级医院接受F/BEVAR治疗CAAA和TAAA的所有70岁或以下的连续患者。根据血管外科学会(SVS)临床合并症分级系统,所有受试者均为中低风险。主要终点是技术和临床成功率、晚期总存活率和主动脉相关存活率。主要并发症和特定靶血管相关结果作为次要终点进行研究:在研究期间,共有 183 名患者(155 名男性,占 84.7%;平均年龄 64.5 + 5.7 岁,33-70 岁不等)接受了 F/BEVAR 手术,共切除了 167 个(91.3%)退行性动脉瘤和 16 个(8.7%)断裂后动脉瘤,包括 44 个(24%)并arenal 动脉瘤、33 个(18%)pararenal 动脉瘤和 106 个(58%)胸腹主动脉瘤。176例(96.2%)和171例(93.4%)患者分别取得了技术和临床成功。4名患者(2.2%)在围手术期死亡,其中2名(1.1%)在急诊手术中死亡。术后,5 名患者(2.7%)出现永久性三级脊髓损伤,3 名患者(1.6%)出现肾衰竭,需要永久性透析。平均随访时间为 65.7 + 39.6 个月(1-158 个月)。12个月、60个月和120个月的估计总存活率和主动脉相关存活率分别为94.0%、85.1%、72.2%和97.8%、97.8%、96.2%,而同一时间间隔内的再介入和无分支不稳定存活率分别为84.4%、71.8%、71.8%和93.2%、86.3%、72.2%。有 6 例患者(3.3%)发现动脉瘤增长大于 5 毫米,而有 118 例患者(64.5%)发现动脉囊收缩大于 5 毫米。Cox回归分析显示,需要进行计划外手术是总死亡率的唯一风险因素[OR=3.331 (1.397-7.940),P < 0.01]:年轻体健的患者接受 F/BEVAR 术后围术期死亡率和主要发病率较低,长期总生存率较高,因此该技术对这类患者尤其具有吸引力。从年轻患者的治疗结果中获得的长期数据可为重新定义治疗适应症提供有用信息,并在未来对设备和技术进行有针对性的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term results of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in young and fit patients.

Background: Endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAa) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with fenestrated and branched devices (F/BEVAR) represents the first-line treatment in old or unfit patients. Currently, the widespread diffusion of these techniques has led to a progressive increase of complex endovascular procedures also in younger and fitter patients, but the related results have been only minimally reported, without long-term data. We investigated the long-term results of F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA repair in young and fit patients.

Methods: All consecutive patients, aged ≤70 years, who underwent F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA over the last 13 years at two tertiary institutions were included in the study. All subjects presented a low to intermediate risk according to the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical comorbidity grading system. The primary end points were technical and clinical success and late overall and aortic-related survival. Major complications and specific target vessel-related outcomes were investigated as secondary end points.

Results: A total of 183 patients (155 males [84.7%]; mean age, 64.5 ± 5.7 years; range, 33-70 years) underwent F/BEVAR during the study period, for a total of 167 degenerative (91.3%) and 16 postdissection (8.7%) aneurysms, including 44 (24%) juxtarenal, 33 (18%) pararenal, and 106 (58%) TAAAs. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 176 patients (96.2%) and 171 patients (93.4%), respectively. Four patients (2.2%) died perioperatively, of which two (1.1%) operated in emergency. Postoperatively, five patients (2.7%) presented permanent grade 3 spinal cord injury and three (1.6%) renal failure needing permanent dialysis. The mean follow-up was 65.7 ± 39.6 months (range, 1-158 months). The estimated overall and aortic-related survival at 12, 60, and 120 months was 94.0%, 85.1%, 72.2%, and 97.8%, 97.8%, 96.2%, respectively, and reintervention and branch instability-free survival at the same time points were 84.4%, 71.8%, 71.8%, and 93.2%, 86.3%, 72.2%, respectively. An aneurysm growth of >5 mm was detected in six patients (3.3%), and a sac shrinkage of >5 mm was achieved in 118 cases (64.5%). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated the need for unplanned procedure as the only risk factor for overall mortality (odds ratio, 3.331; 95% confidence interval, 1.397-7.940; P < .01].

Conclusions: F/BEVAR in young and fit patients led to low perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates and a favorable overall survival rate in the long-term, making this technique particularly appealing in such a subgroup of patients. The availability of long-term data derived from the results of young patients, may additionally provide helpful information to redefine the indications for treatment and allow future targeted device and technique improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Detangling sex-based disparities in acute limb ischemia outcomes-Progress is being made, but we are behind the curve. Just because we can technically do something does not mean that we should. Off-the-shelf Gore thoracoabdominal multibranch endoprosthesis: How will it impact physician-modified endografts? Race and income do not affect ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment modality. Radiation-induced bilateral common carotid artery occlusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1