[国际最佳实践指南计划(BPSO®)的实施对一家公立医院医疗成果的影响]。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.006
{"title":"[国际最佳实践指南计划(BPSO®)的实施对一家公立医院医疗成果的影响]。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the impact on patient health outcomes after implementing 4 Good Practice Guidelines (GPG) in a level II public university hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasi-experimental pre-post study was carried out at the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, belonging to the Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS) of the Community of Madrid. Anonymized patient health indicator data from February 2018 to December 2022 from a total of 4853 patient records were analyzed. Inclusion criteria all patients defined in the scope of each GBP. The sample analyzed was patients discharged in the last 5 working days of the month for all GBPs, except in Ostomy and Stroke, for which 100% of patients discharged during the month were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The main results were: incidence of pressure injury from 2.70% (2017) to 1.03% (2022); stoma marking from 66.67% (2017) to 75% (2022); exclusive breastfeeding from 50% (2017) to 61.54% (2022); neurological assessment on admission from 75.56% (2017) to 85.60% (2022).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The implementation of the GBPs led to an improvement in the health indicators of patients admitted to the target units. Improvements were observed in both process and outcome indicators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacto de la implantación del programa internacional de Guías de Buenas Prácticas (BPSO®) en los resultados de salud en un hospital público\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the impact on patient health outcomes after implementing 4 Good Practice Guidelines (GPG) in a level II public university hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasi-experimental pre-post study was carried out at the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, belonging to the Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS) of the Community of Madrid. Anonymized patient health indicator data from February 2018 to December 2022 from a total of 4853 patient records were analyzed. Inclusion criteria all patients defined in the scope of each GBP. The sample analyzed was patients discharged in the last 5 working days of the month for all GBPs, except in Ostomy and Stroke, for which 100% of patients discharged during the month were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The main results were: incidence of pressure injury from 2.70% (2017) to 1.03% (2022); stoma marking from 66.67% (2017) to 75% (2022); exclusive breastfeeding from 50% (2017) to 61.54% (2022); neurological assessment on admission from 75.56% (2017) to 85.60% (2022).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The implementation of the GBPs led to an improvement in the health indicators of patients admitted to the target units. Improvements were observed in both process and outcome indicators.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析一家二级公立大学医院在实施 4 项《良好实践指南》(GPG)后对患者健康结果的影响:在隶属于马德里社区医疗服务机构(SERMAS)的阿尔科尔孔基金会大学医院开展了一项准实验前-后研究。分析了从 2018 年 2 月至 2022 年 12 月共 4853 份病历中的匿名患者健康指标数据。纳入标准为每个国标项目范围内定义的所有患者。分析的样本是所有国标项目当月最后5个工作日出院的患者,但造口术和中风除外,这两个项目100%纳入当月出院的患者:主要结果为:压伤发生率从2.70%(2017年)降至1.03%(2022年);造口标记率从66.67%(2017年)降至75%(2022年);纯母乳喂养率从50%(2017年)降至61.54%(2022年);入院时神经评估从75.56%(2017年)降至85.60%(2022年):国标项目的实施改善了目标科室入院患者的健康指标。过程指标和结果指标均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impacto de la implantación del programa internacional de Guías de Buenas Prácticas (BPSO®) en los resultados de salud en un hospital público

Objective

To analyze the impact on patient health outcomes after implementing 4 Good Practice Guidelines (GPG) in a level II public university hospital.

Method

A quasi-experimental pre-post study was carried out at the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, belonging to the Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS) of the Community of Madrid. Anonymized patient health indicator data from February 2018 to December 2022 from a total of 4853 patient records were analyzed. Inclusion criteria all patients defined in the scope of each GBP. The sample analyzed was patients discharged in the last 5 working days of the month for all GBPs, except in Ostomy and Stroke, for which 100% of patients discharged during the month were included.

Results

The main results were: incidence of pressure injury from 2.70% (2017) to 1.03% (2022); stoma marking from 66.67% (2017) to 75% (2022); exclusive breastfeeding from 50% (2017) to 61.54% (2022); neurological assessment on admission from 75.56% (2017) to 85.60% (2022).

Conclusions

The implementation of the GBPs led to an improvement in the health indicators of patients admitted to the target units. Improvements were observed in both process and outcome indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia]. Analysis of quality of life of patients with refractive errors in India. A propósito de una encuesta sobre riesgos de la enfermedad de Chagas Utilidad del instrumento AGREE para la elaboración y la evaluación de protocolos clínicos: de la teoría a la práctica clínica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1