城市绿地的维护与生物多样性之间的关系:综述

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105153
Xinlei Hu , M.F. Lima
{"title":"城市绿地的维护与生物多样性之间的关系:综述","authors":"Xinlei Hu ,&nbsp;M.F. Lima","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most urban green spaces (UGSs) today are under intensive maintenance practices, including mowing, cutting and/or chemical input, among many other practices. A growing body of research has questioned the biodiversity value of highly manicured UGSs and suggested the biodiversity potential of reduced-intensity maintenance regimes. However, the evidence for a relationship between maintenance and biodiversity in UGSs is still unclear and yet to be fully understood. This paper systematically reviews 92 published papers to examine this association. Our results showed a complex association between maintenance and biodiversity, mainly dependent on the type of maintenance practice studied and the measurement of biodiversity. Mowing was the predominant maintenance practice that had been investigated, and the evidence from these papers constantly reported a negative association between mowing intensity and various aspects of plant diversity. Similarly, reduced mowing intensity appeared to favour invertebrate diversity, yet many studies also found mixed associations as well as variations across taxonomic groups. The few studies on chemical input showed a negative association between the frequency of use of herbicides/pesticides/insecticides and the diversity of plants, invertebrates, and birds. Nuanced findings, including a non-linear association between maintenance intensity and biodiversity, and temporal/geographical differences, are discussed in this paper. This review offers insights for the development of biodiversity-friendly management strategies, highlighting existing research gaps and the need for further research concerning the maintenance-biodiversity link in UGSs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105153"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462400152X/pdfft?md5=d9b0efadb4fcd1e4fc7213c4712cda37&pid=1-s2.0-S016920462400152X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: A review\",\"authors\":\"Xinlei Hu ,&nbsp;M.F. Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most urban green spaces (UGSs) today are under intensive maintenance practices, including mowing, cutting and/or chemical input, among many other practices. A growing body of research has questioned the biodiversity value of highly manicured UGSs and suggested the biodiversity potential of reduced-intensity maintenance regimes. However, the evidence for a relationship between maintenance and biodiversity in UGSs is still unclear and yet to be fully understood. This paper systematically reviews 92 published papers to examine this association. Our results showed a complex association between maintenance and biodiversity, mainly dependent on the type of maintenance practice studied and the measurement of biodiversity. Mowing was the predominant maintenance practice that had been investigated, and the evidence from these papers constantly reported a negative association between mowing intensity and various aspects of plant diversity. Similarly, reduced mowing intensity appeared to favour invertebrate diversity, yet many studies also found mixed associations as well as variations across taxonomic groups. The few studies on chemical input showed a negative association between the frequency of use of herbicides/pesticides/insecticides and the diversity of plants, invertebrates, and birds. Nuanced findings, including a non-linear association between maintenance intensity and biodiversity, and temporal/geographical differences, are discussed in this paper. This review offers insights for the development of biodiversity-friendly management strategies, highlighting existing research gaps and the need for further research concerning the maintenance-biodiversity link in UGSs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462400152X/pdfft?md5=d9b0efadb4fcd1e4fc7213c4712cda37&pid=1-s2.0-S016920462400152X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462400152X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462400152X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,大多数城市绿地(UGSs)都采用密集型维护方式,包括修剪、砍伐和/或化学投入等多种方式。越来越多的研究对高度修剪的城市绿地的生物多样性价值提出了质疑,并认为降低养护强度的养护制度具有生物多样性潜力。然而,关于 UGS 的维护与生物多样性之间关系的证据仍不明确,有待充分了解。本文系统回顾了已发表的 92 篇论文,以研究这种关系。我们的研究结果表明,维护与生物多样性之间存在复杂的关系,主要取决于所研究的维护实践类型和生物多样性的测量方法。除草是已研究过的最主要的维护方式,这些论文中的证据不断表明,除草强度与植物多样性的各个方面之间存在负相关。同样,降低除草强度似乎有利于无脊椎动物的多样性,但许多研究也发现两者之间存在混合关系,不同分类群之间也存在差异。有关化学投入的少数研究表明,除草剂/杀虫剂/杀虫剂的使用频率与植物、无脊椎动物和鸟类的多样性之间存在负相关。本文讨论了一些细微的发现,包括维护强度与生物多样性之间的非线性关系以及时间/地理差异。这篇综述为制定生物多样性友好型管理策略提供了启示,同时强调了现有研究的不足之处,以及进一步研究 UGS 中维护与生物多样性之间联系的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: A review

Most urban green spaces (UGSs) today are under intensive maintenance practices, including mowing, cutting and/or chemical input, among many other practices. A growing body of research has questioned the biodiversity value of highly manicured UGSs and suggested the biodiversity potential of reduced-intensity maintenance regimes. However, the evidence for a relationship between maintenance and biodiversity in UGSs is still unclear and yet to be fully understood. This paper systematically reviews 92 published papers to examine this association. Our results showed a complex association between maintenance and biodiversity, mainly dependent on the type of maintenance practice studied and the measurement of biodiversity. Mowing was the predominant maintenance practice that had been investigated, and the evidence from these papers constantly reported a negative association between mowing intensity and various aspects of plant diversity. Similarly, reduced mowing intensity appeared to favour invertebrate diversity, yet many studies also found mixed associations as well as variations across taxonomic groups. The few studies on chemical input showed a negative association between the frequency of use of herbicides/pesticides/insecticides and the diversity of plants, invertebrates, and birds. Nuanced findings, including a non-linear association between maintenance intensity and biodiversity, and temporal/geographical differences, are discussed in this paper. This review offers insights for the development of biodiversity-friendly management strategies, highlighting existing research gaps and the need for further research concerning the maintenance-biodiversity link in UGSs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Integrated assessment of urban green infrastructure multifunctionality: Insights from Stavanger Landscapes of thermal inequality: Exploring patterns of climate justice across multiple spatial scales in Spain “I like seeing people, different cultures, and hearing different music”: Exploring adolescent perspectives of inclusive and healthy high-rise and dense urban environment designs Multi-species ecological network based on asymmetric movement: Application in an urban rural fringe Narratives of exclusion: A photovoice study towards racial equity and justice in public urban greenspaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1