Febe Demedts , Kristian Kiili , Manuel Ninaus , Antero Lindstedt , Bert Reynvoet , Delphine Sasanguie , Fien Depaepe
{"title":"数字教育游戏中的解释性自适应反馈对增强分数理解的有效性","authors":"Febe Demedts , Kristian Kiili , Manuel Ninaus , Antero Lindstedt , Bert Reynvoet , Delphine Sasanguie , Fien Depaepe","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Digital educational games have the potential to address cognitive and non-cognitive obstacles in learning fractions by identifying possible misconceptions and providing explanatory adaptive feedback. However, empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of adaptive feedback in digital educational games is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This intervention study aims: (1) to investigate the effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback on cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes and (2) to explain variances in the effectiveness of the intervention in terms of individual differences.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 288 fourth graders (aged 10–11).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions (i.e., game with corrective or explanatory adaptive feedback) or the control condition. A pre-, post-, retention test was used to examine cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Concerning cognitive learning outcomes, near transfer fraction knowledge improved in both experimental conditions, but not in the control condition. Far transfer fraction knowledge improved in the corrective feedback condition at posttest and in all conditions at retention test. For non-cognitive learning outcomes, math motivation decreased in the control condition and the corrective feedback condition, whereas math anxiety decreased in the explanatory adaptive feedback condition. Math self-concept was lower in both experimental conditions compared to the control condition. Notably, students’ individual differences did not moderate the influence the acquisition of near transfer fraction knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In its current implementation, explanatory adaptive feedback did not improve fraction knowledge beyond what was achieved through corrective feedback alone, although it seemed to be beneficial in reducing math anxiety without decreasing math motivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback within a digital educational game to enhance fraction understanding\",\"authors\":\"Febe Demedts , Kristian Kiili , Manuel Ninaus , Antero Lindstedt , Bert Reynvoet , Delphine Sasanguie , Fien Depaepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Digital educational games have the potential to address cognitive and non-cognitive obstacles in learning fractions by identifying possible misconceptions and providing explanatory adaptive feedback. However, empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of adaptive feedback in digital educational games is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This intervention study aims: (1) to investigate the effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback on cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes and (2) to explain variances in the effectiveness of the intervention in terms of individual differences.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 288 fourth graders (aged 10–11).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions (i.e., game with corrective or explanatory adaptive feedback) or the control condition. A pre-, post-, retention test was used to examine cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Concerning cognitive learning outcomes, near transfer fraction knowledge improved in both experimental conditions, but not in the control condition. Far transfer fraction knowledge improved in the corrective feedback condition at posttest and in all conditions at retention test. For non-cognitive learning outcomes, math motivation decreased in the control condition and the corrective feedback condition, whereas math anxiety decreased in the explanatory adaptive feedback condition. Math self-concept was lower in both experimental conditions compared to the control condition. Notably, students’ individual differences did not moderate the influence the acquisition of near transfer fraction knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In its current implementation, explanatory adaptive feedback did not improve fraction knowledge beyond what was achieved through corrective feedback alone, although it seemed to be beneficial in reducing math anxiety without decreasing math motivation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001038\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback within a digital educational game to enhance fraction understanding
Background
Digital educational games have the potential to address cognitive and non-cognitive obstacles in learning fractions by identifying possible misconceptions and providing explanatory adaptive feedback. However, empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of adaptive feedback in digital educational games is limited.
Aims
This intervention study aims: (1) to investigate the effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback on cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes and (2) to explain variances in the effectiveness of the intervention in terms of individual differences.
Sample
Participants were 288 fourth graders (aged 10–11).
Methods
Students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions (i.e., game with corrective or explanatory adaptive feedback) or the control condition. A pre-, post-, retention test was used to examine cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes.
Results
Concerning cognitive learning outcomes, near transfer fraction knowledge improved in both experimental conditions, but not in the control condition. Far transfer fraction knowledge improved in the corrective feedback condition at posttest and in all conditions at retention test. For non-cognitive learning outcomes, math motivation decreased in the control condition and the corrective feedback condition, whereas math anxiety decreased in the explanatory adaptive feedback condition. Math self-concept was lower in both experimental conditions compared to the control condition. Notably, students’ individual differences did not moderate the influence the acquisition of near transfer fraction knowledge.
Conclusions
In its current implementation, explanatory adaptive feedback did not improve fraction knowledge beyond what was achieved through corrective feedback alone, although it seemed to be beneficial in reducing math anxiety without decreasing math motivation.
期刊介绍：
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
