Xiaonan Sun, Fanghui Ci, Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Xiaoqian Liu
{"title":"公司层面的气候风险与公司违规行为:企业管理者的压力感知视角","authors":"Xiaonan Sun, Fanghui Ci, Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Xiaoqian Liu","doi":"10.1002/mde.4323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study is grounded in the perspective of pressure perception, examining how a company's awareness of climate risk influences its propensity for violations. The study reveals that an enhanced perception of climate risks is correlated with an increased likelihood of such behaviors. This effect is primarily mediated through a mechanism of stress transmission, exacerbating the myopia and rent-seeking activities of corporate managers. Furthermore, this study integrates a heterogeneity analysis within the framework of the fraud triangle theory to explore strategies for mitigating the impact of climate risk perception on corporate violations. The findings indicate that the influence of climate risk perception on corporate violations becomes insignificant under certain conditions: when companies offer strong equity incentives to managers, thus alleviating pressure; when companies are heavily influenced by Confucian culture, thereby reducing rationalizations; and when companies possess robust internal governance and are subject to stringent external oversight, thereby diminishing opportunities for violations. This study not only validates the pressure transmission mechanism of climate risk but also proposes avenues for mitigating the onset of non-compliant behaviors induced by the perception of climate risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"45 8","pages":"5430-5448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firm-level climate risk and corporate violations: Perspective of corporate managers' pressure perception\",\"authors\":\"Xiaonan Sun, Fanghui Ci, Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Xiaoqian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study is grounded in the perspective of pressure perception, examining how a company's awareness of climate risk influences its propensity for violations. The study reveals that an enhanced perception of climate risks is correlated with an increased likelihood of such behaviors. This effect is primarily mediated through a mechanism of stress transmission, exacerbating the myopia and rent-seeking activities of corporate managers. Furthermore, this study integrates a heterogeneity analysis within the framework of the fraud triangle theory to explore strategies for mitigating the impact of climate risk perception on corporate violations. The findings indicate that the influence of climate risk perception on corporate violations becomes insignificant under certain conditions: when companies offer strong equity incentives to managers, thus alleviating pressure; when companies are heavily influenced by Confucian culture, thereby reducing rationalizations; and when companies possess robust internal governance and are subject to stringent external oversight, thereby diminishing opportunities for violations. This study not only validates the pressure transmission mechanism of climate risk but also proposes avenues for mitigating the onset of non-compliant behaviors induced by the perception of climate risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"5430-5448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Firm-level climate risk and corporate violations: Perspective of corporate managers' pressure perception
This study is grounded in the perspective of pressure perception, examining how a company's awareness of climate risk influences its propensity for violations. The study reveals that an enhanced perception of climate risks is correlated with an increased likelihood of such behaviors. This effect is primarily mediated through a mechanism of stress transmission, exacerbating the myopia and rent-seeking activities of corporate managers. Furthermore, this study integrates a heterogeneity analysis within the framework of the fraud triangle theory to explore strategies for mitigating the impact of climate risk perception on corporate violations. The findings indicate that the influence of climate risk perception on corporate violations becomes insignificant under certain conditions: when companies offer strong equity incentives to managers, thus alleviating pressure; when companies are heavily influenced by Confucian culture, thereby reducing rationalizations; and when companies possess robust internal governance and are subject to stringent external oversight, thereby diminishing opportunities for violations. This study not only validates the pressure transmission mechanism of climate risk but also proposes avenues for mitigating the onset of non-compliant behaviors induced by the perception of climate risk.
期刊介绍:
Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.