从 "学习型组织 "视角看急诊科出院中心项目评估:方法、经验教训和未来方向

Bibi S Razack, Naya B Mahabir, Lisa Iyeke, Lindsay Jordan, Roland Hope, Emily Diaz, Lyze Barcia, Diana Fuzailov, Helena Willis, Marina Gizzi-Murphy, Frederick Davis, Adam Berman, Mark Richman, Nancy Kwon
{"title":"从 \"学习型组织 \"视角看急诊科出院中心项目评估:方法、经验教训和未来方向","authors":"Bibi S Razack, Naya B Mahabir, Lisa Iyeke, Lindsay Jordan, Roland Hope, Emily Diaz, Lyze Barcia, Diana Fuzailov, Helena Willis, Marina Gizzi-Murphy, Frederick Davis, Adam Berman, Mark Richman, Nancy Kwon","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our ED's Discharge Center (EDDC) facilitates appointments and paper-based social determinants of health (SDoH) screening. No criteria guide EDDC utilization. The ED's provider-administrator-run, patient-satisfying follow-up call program contacts only ~25% of discharges. We describe Learning Organization-principle-guided evaluation of EDDC efficiency, aiming to create EDDC time to expand the follow-up program. We reviewed appointment-making, SDoH-screening, and follow-up program data. We surveyed patients to determine whether adopting SHOUT tool criteria (no home, no primary care physician, or insurance) might yield more-judicious EDDC utilization. EDDC staff's 20 minutes/patient yielded fewer ED returns and admissions. Most patients improved post-discharge and made appointments themselves; 6% met SHOUT criteria for EDDC assistance; 4.5% would benefit from SDoH screening.\nAdopting SHOUT criteria would create significant time for EDDC-staffed follow-up program expansion. QR-code-accessible SDoH surveys would screen thousands more patients, minimizing EDDC staff involvement, saving 95% of the effort while retaining 100% of the benefit.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department Discharge Center Program Evaluation from a \\\"Learning Organization\\\" lens: Methods, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Bibi S Razack, Naya B Mahabir, Lisa Iyeke, Lindsay Jordan, Roland Hope, Emily Diaz, Lyze Barcia, Diana Fuzailov, Helena Willis, Marina Gizzi-Murphy, Frederick Davis, Adam Berman, Mark Richman, Nancy Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our ED's Discharge Center (EDDC) facilitates appointments and paper-based social determinants of health (SDoH) screening. No criteria guide EDDC utilization. The ED's provider-administrator-run, patient-satisfying follow-up call program contacts only ~25% of discharges. We describe Learning Organization-principle-guided evaluation of EDDC efficiency, aiming to create EDDC time to expand the follow-up program. We reviewed appointment-making, SDoH-screening, and follow-up program data. We surveyed patients to determine whether adopting SHOUT tool criteria (no home, no primary care physician, or insurance) might yield more-judicious EDDC utilization. EDDC staff's 20 minutes/patient yielded fewer ED returns and admissions. Most patients improved post-discharge and made appointments themselves; 6% met SHOUT criteria for EDDC assistance; 4.5% would benefit from SDoH screening.\\nAdopting SHOUT criteria would create significant time for EDDC-staffed follow-up program expansion. QR-code-accessible SDoH surveys would screen thousands more patients, minimizing EDDC staff involvement, saving 95% of the effort while retaining 100% of the benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的急诊室出院中心 (EDDC) 为预约和纸质健康社会决定因素 (SDoH) 筛查提供便利。EDDC 的使用不需要任何标准。急诊室由医疗服务提供者-管理员运营的、令患者满意的随访呼叫计划仅接触了约 25% 的出院患者。我们介绍了在学习型组织原则指导下对 EDDC 效率进行的评估,旨在为扩大随访计划创造 EDDC 时间。我们回顾了预约、SDoH 筛选和随访计划的数据。我们对患者进行了调查,以确定采用 SHOUT 工具标准(无家可归、无主治医生或无保险)是否能更明智地利用 EDDC。EDDC 工作人员为每位患者花费的 20 分钟减少了急诊室返院和入院人数。大多数患者在出院后病情有所好转,并自行预约了就诊时间;6% 的患者符合接受 EDDC 援助的 SHOUT 标准;4.5% 的患者将受益于 SDoH 筛查。使用 QR 码进行 SDoH 调查可筛查成千上万名患者,最大程度减少 EDDC 工作人员的参与,节省 95% 的工作量,同时保留 100% 的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency Department Discharge Center Program Evaluation from a "Learning Organization" lens: Methods, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions
Our ED's Discharge Center (EDDC) facilitates appointments and paper-based social determinants of health (SDoH) screening. No criteria guide EDDC utilization. The ED's provider-administrator-run, patient-satisfying follow-up call program contacts only ~25% of discharges. We describe Learning Organization-principle-guided evaluation of EDDC efficiency, aiming to create EDDC time to expand the follow-up program. We reviewed appointment-making, SDoH-screening, and follow-up program data. We surveyed patients to determine whether adopting SHOUT tool criteria (no home, no primary care physician, or insurance) might yield more-judicious EDDC utilization. EDDC staff's 20 minutes/patient yielded fewer ED returns and admissions. Most patients improved post-discharge and made appointments themselves; 6% met SHOUT criteria for EDDC assistance; 4.5% would benefit from SDoH screening. Adopting SHOUT criteria would create significant time for EDDC-staffed follow-up program expansion. QR-code-accessible SDoH surveys would screen thousands more patients, minimizing EDDC staff involvement, saving 95% of the effort while retaining 100% of the benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-hospital stay of anemic patients (70-90 g.L-1) in the ED with/without transfusion: a single-center propensity-matched study. Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature. Feasibility of mixed-reality telecollaboration to enhance pre-medical student shadowing education Evaluating the Impact of NHS Strikes on Patient Flow through Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1