Bibi S Razack, Naya B Mahabir, Lisa Iyeke, Lindsay Jordan, Roland Hope, Emily Diaz, Lyze Barcia, Diana Fuzailov, Helena Willis, Marina Gizzi-Murphy, Frederick Davis, Adam Berman, Mark Richman, Nancy Kwon
{"title":"从 \"学习型组织 \"视角看急诊科出院中心项目评估:方法、经验教训和未来方向","authors":"Bibi S Razack, Naya B Mahabir, Lisa Iyeke, Lindsay Jordan, Roland Hope, Emily Diaz, Lyze Barcia, Diana Fuzailov, Helena Willis, Marina Gizzi-Murphy, Frederick Davis, Adam Berman, Mark Richman, Nancy Kwon","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our ED's Discharge Center (EDDC) facilitates appointments and paper-based social determinants of health (SDoH) screening. No criteria guide EDDC utilization. The ED's provider-administrator-run, patient-satisfying follow-up call program contacts only ~25% of discharges. We describe Learning Organization-principle-guided evaluation of EDDC efficiency, aiming to create EDDC time to expand the follow-up program. We reviewed appointment-making, SDoH-screening, and follow-up program data. We surveyed patients to determine whether adopting SHOUT tool criteria (no home, no primary care physician, or insurance) might yield more-judicious EDDC utilization. EDDC staff's 20 minutes/patient yielded fewer ED returns and admissions. Most patients improved post-discharge and made appointments themselves; 6% met SHOUT criteria for EDDC assistance; 4.5% would benefit from SDoH screening.\nAdopting SHOUT criteria would create significant time for EDDC-staffed follow-up program expansion. QR-code-accessible SDoH surveys would screen thousands more patients, minimizing EDDC staff involvement, saving 95% of the effort while retaining 100% of the benefit.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department Discharge Center Program Evaluation from a \\\"Learning Organization\\\" lens: Methods, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Bibi S Razack, Naya B Mahabir, Lisa Iyeke, Lindsay Jordan, Roland Hope, Emily Diaz, Lyze Barcia, Diana Fuzailov, Helena Willis, Marina Gizzi-Murphy, Frederick Davis, Adam Berman, Mark Richman, Nancy Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our ED's Discharge Center (EDDC) facilitates appointments and paper-based social determinants of health (SDoH) screening. No criteria guide EDDC utilization. The ED's provider-administrator-run, patient-satisfying follow-up call program contacts only ~25% of discharges. We describe Learning Organization-principle-guided evaluation of EDDC efficiency, aiming to create EDDC time to expand the follow-up program. We reviewed appointment-making, SDoH-screening, and follow-up program data. We surveyed patients to determine whether adopting SHOUT tool criteria (no home, no primary care physician, or insurance) might yield more-judicious EDDC utilization. EDDC staff's 20 minutes/patient yielded fewer ED returns and admissions. Most patients improved post-discharge and made appointments themselves; 6% met SHOUT criteria for EDDC assistance; 4.5% would benefit from SDoH screening.\\nAdopting SHOUT criteria would create significant time for EDDC-staffed follow-up program expansion. QR-code-accessible SDoH surveys would screen thousands more patients, minimizing EDDC staff involvement, saving 95% of the effort while retaining 100% of the benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24310873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Emergency Department Discharge Center Program Evaluation from a "Learning Organization" lens: Methods, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions
Our ED's Discharge Center (EDDC) facilitates appointments and paper-based social determinants of health (SDoH) screening. No criteria guide EDDC utilization. The ED's provider-administrator-run, patient-satisfying follow-up call program contacts only ~25% of discharges. We describe Learning Organization-principle-guided evaluation of EDDC efficiency, aiming to create EDDC time to expand the follow-up program. We reviewed appointment-making, SDoH-screening, and follow-up program data. We surveyed patients to determine whether adopting SHOUT tool criteria (no home, no primary care physician, or insurance) might yield more-judicious EDDC utilization. EDDC staff's 20 minutes/patient yielded fewer ED returns and admissions. Most patients improved post-discharge and made appointments themselves; 6% met SHOUT criteria for EDDC assistance; 4.5% would benefit from SDoH screening.
Adopting SHOUT criteria would create significant time for EDDC-staffed follow-up program expansion. QR-code-accessible SDoH surveys would screen thousands more patients, minimizing EDDC staff involvement, saving 95% of the effort while retaining 100% of the benefit.