小组数据中的异质分组结构

Katerina Chrysikou, George Kapetanios
{"title":"小组数据中的异质分组结构","authors":"Katerina Chrysikou, George Kapetanios","doi":"arxiv-2407.19509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine the existence of heterogeneity within a group, in\npanels with latent grouping structure. The assumption of within group\nhomogeneity is prevalent in this literature, implying that the formation of\ngroups alleviates cross-sectional heterogeneity, regardless of the prior\nknowledge of groups. While the latter hypothesis makes inference powerful, it\ncan be often restrictive. We allow for models with richer heterogeneity that\ncan be found both in the cross-section and within a group, without imposing the\nsimple assumption that all groups must be heterogeneous. We further contribute\nto the method proposed by \\cite{su2016identifying}, by showing that the model\nparameters can be consistently estimated and the groups, while unknown, can be\nidentifiable in the presence of different types of heterogeneity. Within the\nsame framework we consider the validity of assuming both cross-sectional and\nwithin group homogeneity, using testing procedures. Simulations demonstrate\ngood finite-sample performance of the approach in both classification and\nestimation, while empirical applications across several datasets provide\nevidence of multiple clusters, as well as reject the hypothesis of within group\nhomogeneity.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous Grouping Structures in Panel Data\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Chrysikou, George Kapetanios\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.19509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we examine the existence of heterogeneity within a group, in\\npanels with latent grouping structure. The assumption of within group\\nhomogeneity is prevalent in this literature, implying that the formation of\\ngroups alleviates cross-sectional heterogeneity, regardless of the prior\\nknowledge of groups. While the latter hypothesis makes inference powerful, it\\ncan be often restrictive. We allow for models with richer heterogeneity that\\ncan be found both in the cross-section and within a group, without imposing the\\nsimple assumption that all groups must be heterogeneous. We further contribute\\nto the method proposed by \\\\cite{su2016identifying}, by showing that the model\\nparameters can be consistently estimated and the groups, while unknown, can be\\nidentifiable in the presence of different types of heterogeneity. Within the\\nsame framework we consider the validity of assuming both cross-sectional and\\nwithin group homogeneity, using testing procedures. Simulations demonstrate\\ngood finite-sample performance of the approach in both classification and\\nestimation, while empirical applications across several datasets provide\\nevidence of multiple clusters, as well as reject the hypothesis of within group\\nhomogeneity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了在具有潜在分组结构的面板中,组内是否存在异质性。组内异质性假设在这一文献中非常普遍,这意味着无论预先了解的组别如何,组别的形成都会减轻横截面异质性。虽然后一种假设使推断更为有力,但它往往具有限制性。我们允许模型具有更丰富的异质性,这种异质性既可以在横截面中发现,也可以在群体内部发现,而不强加所有群体都必须是异质性的简单假设。通过证明模型参数可以得到一致的估计,并且在存在不同类型异质性的情况下,组别虽然是未知的,但可以是可识别的,我们进一步为(cite{su2016identifying}提出的方法做出了贡献。在同一框架内,我们利用测试程序考虑了假设横截面同质性和组内同质性的有效性。模拟结果表明,该方法在分类和估计方面都具有良好的有限样本性能,而在多个数据集上的经验应用则提供了多个聚类的证据,并拒绝了组内同质性假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneous Grouping Structures in Panel Data
In this paper we examine the existence of heterogeneity within a group, in panels with latent grouping structure. The assumption of within group homogeneity is prevalent in this literature, implying that the formation of groups alleviates cross-sectional heterogeneity, regardless of the prior knowledge of groups. While the latter hypothesis makes inference powerful, it can be often restrictive. We allow for models with richer heterogeneity that can be found both in the cross-section and within a group, without imposing the simple assumption that all groups must be heterogeneous. We further contribute to the method proposed by \cite{su2016identifying}, by showing that the model parameters can be consistently estimated and the groups, while unknown, can be identifiable in the presence of different types of heterogeneity. Within the same framework we consider the validity of assuming both cross-sectional and within group homogeneity, using testing procedures. Simulations demonstrate good finite-sample performance of the approach in both classification and estimation, while empirical applications across several datasets provide evidence of multiple clusters, as well as reject the hypothesis of within group homogeneity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simple robust two-stage estimation and inference for generalized impulse responses and multi-horizon causality GPT takes the SAT: Tracing changes in Test Difficulty and Math Performance of Students A Simple and Adaptive Confidence Interval when Nuisance Parameters Satisfy an Inequality Why you should also use OLS estimation of tail exponents On LASSO Inference for High Dimensional Predictive Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1