选举民意调查中的无回复计算:误差总幅度

Jeff Dominitz, Charles F. Manski
{"title":"选举民意调查中的无回复计算:误差总幅度","authors":"Jeff Dominitz, Charles F. Manski","doi":"arxiv-2407.19339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential impact of nonresponse on election polls is well known and\nfrequently acknowledged. Yet measurement and reporting of polling error has\nfocused solely on sampling error, represented by the margin of error of a poll.\nSurvey statisticians have long recommended measurement of the total survey\nerror of a sample estimate by its mean square error (MSE), which jointly\nmeasures sampling and non-sampling errors. Extending the conventional language\nof polling, we think it reasonable to use the square root of maximum MSE to\nmeasure the total margin of error. This paper demonstrates how to measure the\npotential impact of nonresponse using the concept of the total margin of error,\nwhich we argue should be a standard feature in the reporting of election poll\nresults. We first show how to jointly measure statistical imprecision and\nresponse bias when a pollster lacks any knowledge of the candidate preferences\nof non-responders. We then extend the analysis to settings where the pollster\nhas partial knowledge that bounds the preferences of non-responders.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"169 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for Nonresponse in Election Polls: Total Margin of Error\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Dominitz, Charles F. Manski\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.19339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The potential impact of nonresponse on election polls is well known and\\nfrequently acknowledged. Yet measurement and reporting of polling error has\\nfocused solely on sampling error, represented by the margin of error of a poll.\\nSurvey statisticians have long recommended measurement of the total survey\\nerror of a sample estimate by its mean square error (MSE), which jointly\\nmeasures sampling and non-sampling errors. Extending the conventional language\\nof polling, we think it reasonable to use the square root of maximum MSE to\\nmeasure the total margin of error. This paper demonstrates how to measure the\\npotential impact of nonresponse using the concept of the total margin of error,\\nwhich we argue should be a standard feature in the reporting of election poll\\nresults. We first show how to jointly measure statistical imprecision and\\nresponse bias when a pollster lacks any knowledge of the candidate preferences\\nof non-responders. We then extend the analysis to settings where the pollster\\nhas partial knowledge that bounds the preferences of non-responders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非响应对选举民意调查的潜在影响众所周知,也经常得到承认。調查統計學家一直建議用平均平方誤差(MSE)來衡量樣本估計的總調查誤差,即抽樣誤差和非抽樣誤差。扩展传统的民意调查语言,我们认为使用最大 MSE 的平方根来测量总误差幅度是合理的。本文展示了如何使用总误差范围的概念来衡量非响应的潜在影响,我们认为总误差范围应成为选举民调结果报告的标准特征。我们首先展示了在民调机构对非响应者的候选人偏好一无所知的情况下,如何共同衡量统计不精确性和响应偏差。然后,我们将分析扩展到民调机构部分了解非响应者偏好的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accounting for Nonresponse in Election Polls: Total Margin of Error
The potential impact of nonresponse on election polls is well known and frequently acknowledged. Yet measurement and reporting of polling error has focused solely on sampling error, represented by the margin of error of a poll. Survey statisticians have long recommended measurement of the total survey error of a sample estimate by its mean square error (MSE), which jointly measures sampling and non-sampling errors. Extending the conventional language of polling, we think it reasonable to use the square root of maximum MSE to measure the total margin of error. This paper demonstrates how to measure the potential impact of nonresponse using the concept of the total margin of error, which we argue should be a standard feature in the reporting of election poll results. We first show how to jointly measure statistical imprecision and response bias when a pollster lacks any knowledge of the candidate preferences of non-responders. We then extend the analysis to settings where the pollster has partial knowledge that bounds the preferences of non-responders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simple robust two-stage estimation and inference for generalized impulse responses and multi-horizon causality GPT takes the SAT: Tracing changes in Test Difficulty and Math Performance of Students A Simple and Adaptive Confidence Interval when Nuisance Parameters Satisfy an Inequality Why you should also use OLS estimation of tail exponents On LASSO Inference for High Dimensional Predictive Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1