不确定的生活:街区重建过程中的可替代性问题

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1177/23996544241269075
Hila Zaban
{"title":"不确定的生活:街区重建过程中的可替代性问题","authors":"Hila Zaban","doi":"10.1177/23996544241269075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of top-down regeneration plans on residents, specifically focusing on the concept of ‘pestering displaceability’. Using a case study from Beersheba, Israel, it demonstrates how large-scale regeneration plans, while aiming to address housing needs and revitalize old quarters, can potentially displace residents, including homeowners. The concept of displaceability, as defined by Tzfadia and Yiftachel (2022), refers to the potential of being displaced and reflects the erosion of residents’ right to the city as a new order is imposed on their familiar environment. The central argument of the paper is that displaceability creates a sense of constant uncertainty—an urban state of mind characterized by a pestering nuisance—which individuals across different global contexts increasingly experience. Displaceability is not merely a mental condition of long-term anxiety. It is the new urban condition, a political condition manifested in a new and deteriorated form of urban citizenship. The study examines residents’ perceptions of potential displacement from their neighbourhood, which elicit both hopeful and fearful sentiments. Focusing on Beersheba’s Gimel neighbourhood, currently undergoing regeneration after a period of disinvestment, the research delves into the pre-gentrification era characterized by uncertainty regarding the process’s outcomes, including its speed, costs, and benefits. The paper documents this transformative phase using qualitative methods such as interviews and participant observation.","PeriodicalId":48108,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertain living: Pestering displaceability in a neighbourhood regeneration process\",\"authors\":\"Hila Zaban\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23996544241269075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the impact of top-down regeneration plans on residents, specifically focusing on the concept of ‘pestering displaceability’. Using a case study from Beersheba, Israel, it demonstrates how large-scale regeneration plans, while aiming to address housing needs and revitalize old quarters, can potentially displace residents, including homeowners. The concept of displaceability, as defined by Tzfadia and Yiftachel (2022), refers to the potential of being displaced and reflects the erosion of residents’ right to the city as a new order is imposed on their familiar environment. The central argument of the paper is that displaceability creates a sense of constant uncertainty—an urban state of mind characterized by a pestering nuisance—which individuals across different global contexts increasingly experience. Displaceability is not merely a mental condition of long-term anxiety. It is the new urban condition, a political condition manifested in a new and deteriorated form of urban citizenship. The study examines residents’ perceptions of potential displacement from their neighbourhood, which elicit both hopeful and fearful sentiments. Focusing on Beersheba’s Gimel neighbourhood, currently undergoing regeneration after a period of disinvestment, the research delves into the pre-gentrification era characterized by uncertainty regarding the process’s outcomes, including its speed, costs, and benefits. The paper documents this transformative phase using qualitative methods such as interviews and participant observation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241269075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241269075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了自上而下的重建计划对居民的影响,特别关注 "纠缠性流离失所 "的概念。通过对以色列贝尔谢巴的案例研究,本文展示了大规模重建计划在满足住房需求和振兴旧区的同时,如何可能导致包括房主在内的居民流离失所。根据 Tzfadia 和 Yiftachel(2022 年)的定义,"可迁移性 "这一概念指的是被迁移的可能性,反映了当新秩序强加于居民熟悉的环境时,居民对城市的权利受到了侵蚀。本文的中心论点是,可流离失所性产生了一种持续的不确定感--一种以纠缠不清的困扰为特征的城市心理状态--不同全球背景下的个人越来越多地体验到这种心理状态。流离失所不仅仅是一种长期焦虑的心理状态。它是一种新的城市状况,是一种政治状况,表现为一种新的、每况愈下的城市公民形式。本研究探讨了居民对其居住区可能出现的流离失所现象的看法,这些看法同时引发了希望和恐惧的情绪。这项研究以贝尔谢巴的吉梅尔社区为重点,该社区在经历了一段时间的撤资后目前正在进行重建,研究深入到了以进程结果的不确定性(包括其速度、成本和收益)为特征的前城市化时代。本文采用访谈和参与观察等定性方法记录了这一转变阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertain living: Pestering displaceability in a neighbourhood regeneration process
This paper examines the impact of top-down regeneration plans on residents, specifically focusing on the concept of ‘pestering displaceability’. Using a case study from Beersheba, Israel, it demonstrates how large-scale regeneration plans, while aiming to address housing needs and revitalize old quarters, can potentially displace residents, including homeowners. The concept of displaceability, as defined by Tzfadia and Yiftachel (2022), refers to the potential of being displaced and reflects the erosion of residents’ right to the city as a new order is imposed on their familiar environment. The central argument of the paper is that displaceability creates a sense of constant uncertainty—an urban state of mind characterized by a pestering nuisance—which individuals across different global contexts increasingly experience. Displaceability is not merely a mental condition of long-term anxiety. It is the new urban condition, a political condition manifested in a new and deteriorated form of urban citizenship. The study examines residents’ perceptions of potential displacement from their neighbourhood, which elicit both hopeful and fearful sentiments. Focusing on Beersheba’s Gimel neighbourhood, currently undergoing regeneration after a period of disinvestment, the research delves into the pre-gentrification era characterized by uncertainty regarding the process’s outcomes, including its speed, costs, and benefits. The paper documents this transformative phase using qualitative methods such as interviews and participant observation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
The struggle against post-truth politics has always been about white supremacy: Lessons from the informational praxis of SNCC Corrigendum to “Beyond displacement: The role of real-estate valuations in shaping urban displaceability” Exploring commoning in the anthropocene. Introducing the concept of the election commons as a response to socio-ecological crisis. The case of Skouries, Greece Communities of exposure, community as exposure: Thinking collective life in the police abolitionist movement Constructing a governmental vision of happiness: Insights from Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1