脊髓脊膜膨出的产前神经外科咨询和胎儿修复的治疗决定因素。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1159/000540237
Belinda Shao, Christian Schroeder, Emilija Sagaityte, Olivia A Kozel, Morgan Pedus, Debra Watson-Smith, Julie Monteagudo, Francois I Luks, Stephen R Carr, Petra M Klinge, Konstantina A Svokos
{"title":"脊髓脊膜膨出的产前神经外科咨询和胎儿修复的治疗决定因素。","authors":"Belinda Shao, Christian Schroeder, Emilija Sagaityte, Olivia A Kozel, Morgan Pedus, Debra Watson-Smith, Julie Monteagudo, Francois I Luks, Stephen R Carr, Petra M Klinge, Konstantina A Svokos","doi":"10.1159/000540237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spina bifida guidelines recommend neurosurgical involvement in prenatal counseling to inform decision-making between prenatal and postnatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair. This study examines whether families with MMC presenting to one fetal center had timely neurosurgical prenatal counseling (nPNC) encounters and assesses modifiable and non-modifiable treatment-determining factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>History and timing of nPNC were quantified among infants undergoing postnatal and prenatal MMC repair, pregnant patients referred, and MMC studies in a fetal MRI database (2015-2023). Fetal repair exclusions, presentation timing, social determinants, and reported rationale for not selecting offered fetal therapy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly all patients (34/35; 97%) engaged in nPNC, 82% prior to 24 weeks GA. Fourteen patients were excluded from fetal repair for lack of hindbrain herniation (43%), obstetric exclusions (21%), fetal exclusions (21%), suspected closed defect (7%), and delayed presentation (7%). These patients ultimately underwent postnatal repair (71%), and pregnancy termination (14%). The 20 fetal-repair-eligible patients selected fetal repair (50%), postnatal repair (45%), and pregnancy termination (5%). Reasons for declining fetal repair included risk (55%) and cost (22%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among MMC families presenting to a regional fetal therapy center, nPNC was widely extended, in a mostly timely fashion. Very few were deterred from fetal repair by potentially modifiable barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal Neurosurgical Counseling for Myelomeningocele and Treatment-Determining Factors for Fetal Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Shao, Christian Schroeder, Emilija Sagaityte, Olivia A Kozel, Morgan Pedus, Debra Watson-Smith, Julie Monteagudo, Francois I Luks, Stephen R Carr, Petra M Klinge, Konstantina A Svokos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spina bifida guidelines recommend neurosurgical involvement in prenatal counseling to inform decision-making between prenatal and postnatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair. This study examines whether families with MMC presenting to one fetal center had timely neurosurgical prenatal counseling (nPNC) encounters and assesses modifiable and non-modifiable treatment-determining factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>History and timing of nPNC were quantified among infants undergoing postnatal and prenatal MMC repair, pregnant patients referred, and MMC studies in a fetal MRI database (2015-2023). Fetal repair exclusions, presentation timing, social determinants, and reported rationale for not selecting offered fetal therapy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly all patients (34/35; 97%) engaged in nPNC, 82% prior to 24 weeks GA. Fourteen patients were excluded from fetal repair for lack of hindbrain herniation (43%), obstetric exclusions (21%), fetal exclusions (21%), suspected closed defect (7%), and delayed presentation (7%). These patients ultimately underwent postnatal repair (71%), and pregnancy termination (14%). The 20 fetal-repair-eligible patients selected fetal repair (50%), postnatal repair (45%), and pregnancy termination (5%). Reasons for declining fetal repair included risk (55%) and cost (22%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among MMC families presenting to a regional fetal therapy center, nPNC was widely extended, in a mostly timely fashion. Very few were deterred from fetal repair by potentially modifiable barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540237\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:脊柱裂指南建议神经外科参与产前咨询(nPNC),为产前和产后脊髓膜膨出修复提供决策依据。本研究探讨了在一家胎儿中心就诊的脊髓脊膜膨出症(MMC)患者家庭是否及时进行了产前咨询,并评估了可改变和不可改变的治疗决定因素。方法:对接受产后和产前MMC修复的婴儿、转诊的孕妇以及胎儿磁共振成像数据库中的MMC研究(2015-2023年)的产前咨询历史和时间进行了量化。评估了胎儿修复排除情况、发病时间、社会决定因素以及未选择提供胎儿治疗的报告理由:几乎所有患者(34/35;97%)都进行了 nPNC,其中 82% 在孕 24 周之前。14名患者因缺乏后脑疝(43%)、产科排除(21%)、胎儿排除(21%)、疑似闭合性缺损(7%)和延迟发病(7%)而被排除在胎儿修复手术之外。这些患者最终接受了产后修复(71%)和终止妊娠(14%)。20名符合胎儿修复条件的患者选择了胎儿修复(50%)、产后修复(45%)和终止妊娠(5%)。拒绝胎儿修复的原因包括风险(55%)和费用(22%):结论:在前往地区胎儿治疗中心就诊的 MMC 家庭中,nPNC 得到了广泛应用,而且大部分都很及时。结论:在前往地区胎儿治疗中心就诊的 MMC 家庭中,nPNC 得到了广泛应用,而且大多很及时。很少有家庭因潜在的可改变障碍而放弃胎儿修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prenatal Neurosurgical Counseling for Myelomeningocele and Treatment-Determining Factors for Fetal Repair.

Introduction: Spina bifida guidelines recommend neurosurgical involvement in prenatal counseling to inform decision-making between prenatal and postnatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair. This study examines whether families with MMC presenting to one fetal center had timely neurosurgical prenatal counseling (nPNC) encounters and assesses modifiable and non-modifiable treatment-determining factors.

Methods: History and timing of nPNC were quantified among infants undergoing postnatal and prenatal MMC repair, pregnant patients referred, and MMC studies in a fetal MRI database (2015-2023). Fetal repair exclusions, presentation timing, social determinants, and reported rationale for not selecting offered fetal therapy were assessed.

Results: Nearly all patients (34/35; 97%) engaged in nPNC, 82% prior to 24 weeks GA. Fourteen patients were excluded from fetal repair for lack of hindbrain herniation (43%), obstetric exclusions (21%), fetal exclusions (21%), suspected closed defect (7%), and delayed presentation (7%). These patients ultimately underwent postnatal repair (71%), and pregnancy termination (14%). The 20 fetal-repair-eligible patients selected fetal repair (50%), postnatal repair (45%), and pregnancy termination (5%). Reasons for declining fetal repair included risk (55%) and cost (22%).

Conclusions: Among MMC families presenting to a regional fetal therapy center, nPNC was widely extended, in a mostly timely fashion. Very few were deterred from fetal repair by potentially modifiable barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Surface rendering of cross-sectional imaging and medical illustration for perinatal planning in conjoined twins. SPECKLE TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN TWIN PREGNANCIES AND THE ROLE OF GLOBAL LONGITUDINAL STRAIN AND PEAK SYSTOLIC STRAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in twin anaemia polycythaemia sequence donors. Cord occlusion in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a retrospective study of laser photocoagulation vs radiofrequency ablation. Added value in low-risk pregnancies of longitudinal changes in uterine Doppler and circulating angiogenic factors during the third trimester in predicting term preeclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1