院前复苏后生命体征表型与院外心脏骤停后的预后有关。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445
Tanner Smida, Bradley S Price, Alan Mizener, Remle P Crowe, James M Bardes
{"title":"院前复苏后生命体征表型与院外心脏骤停后的预后有关。","authors":"Tanner Smida, Bradley S Price, Alan Mizener, Remle P Crowe, James M Bardes","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The use of machine learning to identify patient 'clusters' using post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vital signs may facilitate the identification of patient subgroups at high risk of rearrest and mortality. Our objective was to use k-means clustering to identify post-ROSC vital sign clusters and determine whether these clusters were associated with rearrest and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2022 datasets were used for this study. We included adult, non-traumatic OHCA patients with >2 post-ROSC vital sign sets. Patients were excluded if they had an EMS-witnessed OHCA or were encountered during an interfacility transfer. Unsupervised (<i>k</i>-means) clustering was performed using minimum, maximum, and delta (last minus first) systolic blood pressure (BP), heart rate, SpO<sub>2</sub>, shock index, and pulse pressure. The assessed outcomes were mortality and rearrest. To explore the association between rearrest, mortality, and cluster, multivariable logistic regression modeling was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within our cohort of 12,320 patients, five clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 1 were hypertensive, patients in cluster 2 were normotensive, patients in cluster 3 were hypotensive and tachycardic (<i>n</i> = 2164; 17.6%), patients in cluster 4 were hypoxemic and exhibited increasing systolic BP, and patients in cluster 5 were severely hypoxemic and exhibited a declining systolic BP. The overall proportion of patients who experienced mortality stratified by cluster was 63.4% (c1), 68.1% (c2), 78.8% (c3), 84.8% (c4), and 86.6% (c5). In comparison to the cluster with the lowest mortality (c1), each other cluster was associated with greater odds of mortality and rearrest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unsupervised k-means clustering yielded 5 post-ROSC vital sign clusters that were associated with rearrest and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.\",\"authors\":\"Tanner Smida, Bradley S Price, Alan Mizener, Remle P Crowe, James M Bardes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The use of machine learning to identify patient 'clusters' using post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vital signs may facilitate the identification of patient subgroups at high risk of rearrest and mortality. Our objective was to use k-means clustering to identify post-ROSC vital sign clusters and determine whether these clusters were associated with rearrest and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2022 datasets were used for this study. We included adult, non-traumatic OHCA patients with >2 post-ROSC vital sign sets. Patients were excluded if they had an EMS-witnessed OHCA or were encountered during an interfacility transfer. Unsupervised (<i>k</i>-means) clustering was performed using minimum, maximum, and delta (last minus first) systolic blood pressure (BP), heart rate, SpO<sub>2</sub>, shock index, and pulse pressure. The assessed outcomes were mortality and rearrest. To explore the association between rearrest, mortality, and cluster, multivariable logistic regression modeling was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within our cohort of 12,320 patients, five clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 1 were hypertensive, patients in cluster 2 were normotensive, patients in cluster 3 were hypotensive and tachycardic (<i>n</i> = 2164; 17.6%), patients in cluster 4 were hypoxemic and exhibited increasing systolic BP, and patients in cluster 5 were severely hypoxemic and exhibited a declining systolic BP. The overall proportion of patients who experienced mortality stratified by cluster was 63.4% (c1), 68.1% (c2), 78.8% (c3), 84.8% (c4), and 86.6% (c5). In comparison to the cluster with the lowest mortality (c1), each other cluster was associated with greater odds of mortality and rearrest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unsupervised k-means clustering yielded 5 post-ROSC vital sign clusters that were associated with rearrest and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用自发性循环(ROSC)恢复后的生命体征,通过机器学习识别患者 "群组",可帮助识别再次抢救和死亡率高的患者亚群:利用机器学习识别自发性循环(ROSC)后生命体征的患者 "集群 "可能有助于识别再次发病和死亡风险较高的患者亚群。我们的目标是使用k均值聚类来识别ROSC后生命体征群组,并确定这些群组是否与再休克和死亡率相关。方法:本研究使用了ESO数据协作2018-2022数据集。我们纳入了ROSC后生命体征组数大于2组的成人非创伤性OHCA患者。如果患者有急救人员目击的 OHCA 或在医院间转运过程中遇到 OHCA,则将其排除在外。使用收缩压(BP)、心率、SpO2、休克指数和脉压的最小值、最大值和 delta 值(最后值减去最先值)进行无监督(k-均值)聚类。评估结果为死亡率和再次发病率。结果:在我们的 12,320 名患者队列中,确定了五个群组。第 1 组为高血压患者,第 2 组为正常血压患者,第 3 组为低血压和心动过速患者(n = 2,164; 17.6%),第 4 组为低氧血症患者,收缩压不断升高,第 5 组为严重低氧血症患者,收缩压不断下降。按群组分层,出现死亡的患者总比例分别为 63.4%(c1)、68.1%(c2)、78.8%(c3)、84.8%(c4)和 86.6%(c5)。与死亡率最低的群组(c1)相比,其他群组的死亡率和再次被捕的几率都更高:无监督k均值聚类产生了5个与再次逮捕和死亡率相关的ROSC后生命体征聚类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Objectives: The use of machine learning to identify patient 'clusters' using post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vital signs may facilitate the identification of patient subgroups at high risk of rearrest and mortality. Our objective was to use k-means clustering to identify post-ROSC vital sign clusters and determine whether these clusters were associated with rearrest and mortality.

Methods: The ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2022 datasets were used for this study. We included adult, non-traumatic OHCA patients with >2 post-ROSC vital sign sets. Patients were excluded if they had an EMS-witnessed OHCA or were encountered during an interfacility transfer. Unsupervised (k-means) clustering was performed using minimum, maximum, and delta (last minus first) systolic blood pressure (BP), heart rate, SpO2, shock index, and pulse pressure. The assessed outcomes were mortality and rearrest. To explore the association between rearrest, mortality, and cluster, multivariable logistic regression modeling was used.

Results: Within our cohort of 12,320 patients, five clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 1 were hypertensive, patients in cluster 2 were normotensive, patients in cluster 3 were hypotensive and tachycardic (n = 2164; 17.6%), patients in cluster 4 were hypoxemic and exhibited increasing systolic BP, and patients in cluster 5 were severely hypoxemic and exhibited a declining systolic BP. The overall proportion of patients who experienced mortality stratified by cluster was 63.4% (c1), 68.1% (c2), 78.8% (c3), 84.8% (c4), and 86.6% (c5). In comparison to the cluster with the lowest mortality (c1), each other cluster was associated with greater odds of mortality and rearrest.

Conclusions: Unsupervised k-means clustering yielded 5 post-ROSC vital sign clusters that were associated with rearrest and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Key Takeaways and Progress on Leveraging EMS in Overdose Response Among Five Learning Collaborative States. Uses of Fibrinogen Concentrate in Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy in the Prehospital Environment: A Scoping Review. Correlation Between EtCO2 and PCO2 in Patients Undergoing Critical Care Transport. The National Association of EMS Physicians Compendium of Prehospital Trauma Management Position Statements and Resource Documents. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1