癌症晚期老年人在临终住院期间使用重症监护的趋势。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19119
Snigdha Jain MD, MHS, Jessica B. Long MPH, Vinay Rao DO, Anica C. Law MD, MS, Allan J. Walkey MD, MSc, Elizabeth Prsic MD, Peter K. Lindenauer MD, MSc, Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM, Cary P. Gross MD
{"title":"癌症晚期老年人在临终住院期间使用重症监护的趋势。","authors":"Snigdha Jain MD, MHS,&nbsp;Jessica B. Long MPH,&nbsp;Vinay Rao DO,&nbsp;Anica C. Law MD, MS,&nbsp;Allan J. Walkey MD, MSc,&nbsp;Elizabeth Prsic MD,&nbsp;Peter K. Lindenauer MD, MSc,&nbsp;Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM,&nbsp;Cary P. Gross MD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>High-intensity end-of-life (EOL) care, marked by admission to intensive care units (ICUs) or in-hospital death, can be costly and burdensome. Recent trends in use of ICUs, life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during EOL hospitalizations among older adults with advanced cancer and patterns of in-hospital death are unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used SEER-Medicare data (2003–2017) to identify beneficiaries with advanced solid cancer (summary stage 7) who died within 3 years of diagnosis. We identified EOL hospitalizations (within 30 days of death), classifying them by increasing intensity of care into: (1) without ICU; (2) with ICU but without LST (invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, acute dialysis) or NIV; (3) with ICU and NIV but without LST; and (4) with ICU and LST use. We constructed a multinomial regression model to evaluate trends in risk-adjusted hospitalization, overall and across hospitalization categories, adjusting for sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, and frailty. We evaluated trends in in-hospital death across categories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 226,263 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer, 138,305 (61.1%) were hospitalized at EOL [Age, Mean (SD):77.9(7.1) years; 45.5% female]. Overall, EOL hospitalizations remained high throughout, from 78.1% (95% CI: 77.4, 78.7) in 2004 to 75.5% (95% CI: 74.5, 76.2) in 2017. Hospitalizations without ICU use decreased from 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) to 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9) while hospitalizations with more intensive care increased, from 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5) for ICU without LST or NIV, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) to 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1) for ICU with NIV but without LST, and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) to 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5) for ICU with LST use. Among those who experienced in-hospital death, the proportion receiving ICU care increased from 46.5% to 65.0%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among older adults with advanced cancer, EOL hospitalization rates remained stable from 2004–2017. However, intensity of care during EOL hospitalizations increased as evidenced by increasing use of ICUs, LSTs, and NIV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 12","pages":"3840-3848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer\",\"authors\":\"Snigdha Jain MD, MHS,&nbsp;Jessica B. Long MPH,&nbsp;Vinay Rao DO,&nbsp;Anica C. Law MD, MS,&nbsp;Allan J. Walkey MD, MSc,&nbsp;Elizabeth Prsic MD,&nbsp;Peter K. Lindenauer MD, MSc,&nbsp;Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM,&nbsp;Cary P. Gross MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>High-intensity end-of-life (EOL) care, marked by admission to intensive care units (ICUs) or in-hospital death, can be costly and burdensome. Recent trends in use of ICUs, life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during EOL hospitalizations among older adults with advanced cancer and patterns of in-hospital death are unknown.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used SEER-Medicare data (2003–2017) to identify beneficiaries with advanced solid cancer (summary stage 7) who died within 3 years of diagnosis. We identified EOL hospitalizations (within 30 days of death), classifying them by increasing intensity of care into: (1) without ICU; (2) with ICU but without LST (invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, acute dialysis) or NIV; (3) with ICU and NIV but without LST; and (4) with ICU and LST use. We constructed a multinomial regression model to evaluate trends in risk-adjusted hospitalization, overall and across hospitalization categories, adjusting for sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, and frailty. We evaluated trends in in-hospital death across categories.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 226,263 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer, 138,305 (61.1%) were hospitalized at EOL [Age, Mean (SD):77.9(7.1) years; 45.5% female]. Overall, EOL hospitalizations remained high throughout, from 78.1% (95% CI: 77.4, 78.7) in 2004 to 75.5% (95% CI: 74.5, 76.2) in 2017. Hospitalizations without ICU use decreased from 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) to 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9) while hospitalizations with more intensive care increased, from 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5) for ICU without LST or NIV, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) to 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1) for ICU with NIV but without LST, and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) to 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5) for ICU with LST use. Among those who experienced in-hospital death, the proportion receiving ICU care increased from 46.5% to 65.0%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among older adults with advanced cancer, EOL hospitalization rates remained stable from 2004–2017. However, intensity of care during EOL hospitalizations increased as evidenced by increasing use of ICUs, LSTs, and NIV.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"72 12\",\"pages\":\"3840-3848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以入住重症监护病房(ICU)或院内死亡为标志的高强度生命末期(EOL)护理可能成本高昂且负担沉重。晚期癌症老年人在生命末期住院期间使用重症监护病房、维持生命治疗(LST)和无创通气(NIV)的最新趋势以及院内死亡的模式尚不清楚:我们利用 SEER-Medicare 数据(2003-2017 年)确定了确诊后 3 年内死亡的晚期实体癌(总结性 7 期)受益人。我们确定了临终前(死亡后 30 天内)的住院情况,并根据护理强度的增加将其分为:(1) 无 ICU;(2) 有 ICU,但无 LST(侵入性机械通气、气管切开术、胃造瘘术、急性透析)或 NIV;(3) 有 ICU 和 NIV,但无 LST;(4) 有 ICU 和 LST。我们构建了一个多叉回归模型,以评估风险调整后住院治疗的趋势,包括总体趋势和不同住院类别的趋势,并对社会人口统计学、癌症特征、合并症和虚弱进行了调整。我们还评估了不同住院类别的院内死亡趋势:在 226,263 名晚期癌症医保受益人中,138,305 人(61.1%)在临终前住院[年龄,平均(标清):77.9(7.1) 岁;45.5% 为女性]。总体而言,临终前住院率一直居高不下,从2004年的78.1%(95% CI:77.4,78.7)降至2017年的75.5%(95% CI:74.5,76.2)。未使用重症监护室的住院率从 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) 下降到 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9),而使用更多重症监护的住院率则从 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) 上升到 28.没有使用 LST 或 NIV 的重症监护病房的住院率从 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) 增加到 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5),使用 NIV 但没有使用 LST 的重症监护病房的住院率从 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) 增加到 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1),使用 LST 的重症监护病房的住院率从 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) 增加到 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5)。在出现院内死亡的患者中,接受重症监护室治疗的比例从46.5%上升至65.0%:在患有晚期癌症的老年人中,2004-2017年的临终住院率保持稳定。但是,临终住院期间的护理强度有所增加,这体现在重症监护室、LST 和 NIV 的使用率不断增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer

Background

High-intensity end-of-life (EOL) care, marked by admission to intensive care units (ICUs) or in-hospital death, can be costly and burdensome. Recent trends in use of ICUs, life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during EOL hospitalizations among older adults with advanced cancer and patterns of in-hospital death are unknown.

Methods

We used SEER-Medicare data (2003–2017) to identify beneficiaries with advanced solid cancer (summary stage 7) who died within 3 years of diagnosis. We identified EOL hospitalizations (within 30 days of death), classifying them by increasing intensity of care into: (1) without ICU; (2) with ICU but without LST (invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, acute dialysis) or NIV; (3) with ICU and NIV but without LST; and (4) with ICU and LST use. We constructed a multinomial regression model to evaluate trends in risk-adjusted hospitalization, overall and across hospitalization categories, adjusting for sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, and frailty. We evaluated trends in in-hospital death across categories.

Results

Of 226,263 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer, 138,305 (61.1%) were hospitalized at EOL [Age, Mean (SD):77.9(7.1) years; 45.5% female]. Overall, EOL hospitalizations remained high throughout, from 78.1% (95% CI: 77.4, 78.7) in 2004 to 75.5% (95% CI: 74.5, 76.2) in 2017. Hospitalizations without ICU use decreased from 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) to 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9) while hospitalizations with more intensive care increased, from 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5) for ICU without LST or NIV, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) to 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1) for ICU with NIV but without LST, and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) to 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5) for ICU with LST use. Among those who experienced in-hospital death, the proportion receiving ICU care increased from 46.5% to 65.0%.

Conclusions

Among older adults with advanced cancer, EOL hospitalization rates remained stable from 2004–2017. However, intensity of care during EOL hospitalizations increased as evidenced by increasing use of ICUs, LSTs, and NIV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on the Risk of Falls in a General Population—The Finnish Vitamin D Trial Association of Geriatric Consult Services With Geriatric Processes of Care and Clinical Outcomes in US Trauma Centers The Role of Geriatric Syndromes in Kidney Transplant Decision-Making: A Domain-Based Analysis of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults In Search of Geriatrician Identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1