L González-Vides, J L Hernández-Verdejo, J A Gómez-Pedrero, A Ruiz-Pomeda, P Cañadas-Suárez
{"title":"长 COVID-19 患者的眼球运动行为。","authors":"L González-Vides, J L Hernández-Verdejo, J A Gómez-Pedrero, A Ruiz-Pomeda, P Cañadas-Suárez","doi":"10.1177/02692155241265886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine, the impact of long COVID-19 on oculomotor behaviour.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Spanish Association of Persistent COVID.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>Participants were 75 cases (64 women, 11 men, mean age 46.4 years ±8.9) and 42 controls (22 women, 20 men, mean age 53.5 years ±13.13).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>An eye-tracking test based on visual search paradigm and the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were used to evaluate the participants.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were horizontal reading time, vertical reading time, and their ratio. And for the eye-tracking test the time to find the target, the duration, and the number of eye fixations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases and controls, eye movement test results were horizontal(Hadj) reading time 74.2 ± 22.7 s vs 52.0 ± 6.1 s (<i>p</i> < .0001); vertical(Vadj) reading time 67.6 ± 17.8 s vs 50.4 ± 6.9 s (<i>p</i> < .0001); Hadj/Vadj ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0 (<i>p</i> = .0032), respectively; and eye-tracking test results were fixation number 11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57 (<i>p</i> < .0001); fixation duration 2.01 ± 0.79 s vs 1.5 ± 0.4 s (<i>p</i> = .0013), and time to find target 24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4 (<i>p</i> = .0034), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed a lower performance in oculomotor behaviour in people with long COVID-19, compared to healthy individuals. It cannot be affirmed an ocular musculature dysfunction; the differentiated behaviour could be associated to cognitive alterations affected in these people. Both tests used could be an useful tool for the clinical assessment of these participants. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1372-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oculomotor Behaviour in Individuals with Long COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"L González-Vides, J L Hernández-Verdejo, J A Gómez-Pedrero, A Ruiz-Pomeda, P Cañadas-Suárez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241265886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine, the impact of long COVID-19 on oculomotor behaviour.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Spanish Association of Persistent COVID.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>Participants were 75 cases (64 women, 11 men, mean age 46.4 years ±8.9) and 42 controls (22 women, 20 men, mean age 53.5 years ±13.13).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>An eye-tracking test based on visual search paradigm and the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were used to evaluate the participants.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were horizontal reading time, vertical reading time, and their ratio. And for the eye-tracking test the time to find the target, the duration, and the number of eye fixations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases and controls, eye movement test results were horizontal(Hadj) reading time 74.2 ± 22.7 s vs 52.0 ± 6.1 s (<i>p</i> < .0001); vertical(Vadj) reading time 67.6 ± 17.8 s vs 50.4 ± 6.9 s (<i>p</i> < .0001); Hadj/Vadj ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0 (<i>p</i> = .0032), respectively; and eye-tracking test results were fixation number 11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57 (<i>p</i> < .0001); fixation duration 2.01 ± 0.79 s vs 1.5 ± 0.4 s (<i>p</i> = .0013), and time to find target 24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4 (<i>p</i> = .0034), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed a lower performance in oculomotor behaviour in people with long COVID-19, compared to healthy individuals. It cannot be affirmed an ocular musculature dysfunction; the differentiated behaviour could be associated to cognitive alterations affected in these people. Both tests used could be an useful tool for the clinical assessment of these participants. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1372-1381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241265886\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241265886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：确定长 COVID-19 对眼球运动行为的影响：确定长COVID-19对眼球运动行为的影响：病例对照研究：西班牙持久性 COVID 协会：参与者：75 名病例（64 名女性，11 名男性，平均年龄为 46.4 岁 ±8.9 岁）和 42 名对照组（22 名女性，20 名男性，平均年龄为 53.5 岁 ±13.13 岁）：干预措施：采用基于视觉搜索范式的眼动跟踪测试和成人发育眼动测试对参与者进行评估：成人发育眼动测试的主要结果是水平阅读时间、垂直阅读时间及其比率。眼动追踪测试的主要结果是找到目标的时间、持续时间和眼球固定的次数：结果：病例和对照组的眼动测试结果分别为水平（Hadj）阅读时间（74.2 ± 22.7 秒） vs 52.0 ± 6.1 秒（p p = .0032）；眼球跟踪测试结果分别为固定次数（11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57）（p p = .0013）和找到目标时间（24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4）（p = .0034）：数据显示，与健康人相比，长 COVID-19 患者的眼球运动能力较低。这并不能确定是眼部肌肉功能障碍；行为差异可能与这些人的认知改变有关。所使用的两种测试都可以作为对这些参与者进行临床评估的有用工具。还需要进一步的研究来探讨这些程序的实用性。
Oculomotor Behaviour in Individuals with Long COVID-19.
Objective: To determine, the impact of long COVID-19 on oculomotor behaviour.
Design: A case-control study.
Setting: Spanish Association of Persistent COVID.
Participant: Participants were 75 cases (64 women, 11 men, mean age 46.4 years ±8.9) and 42 controls (22 women, 20 men, mean age 53.5 years ±13.13).
Intervention: An eye-tracking test based on visual search paradigm and the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were used to evaluate the participants.
Main measures: The primary outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were horizontal reading time, vertical reading time, and their ratio. And for the eye-tracking test the time to find the target, the duration, and the number of eye fixations.
Results: In cases and controls, eye movement test results were horizontal(Hadj) reading time 74.2 ± 22.7 s vs 52.0 ± 6.1 s (p < .0001); vertical(Vadj) reading time 67.6 ± 17.8 s vs 50.4 ± 6.9 s (p < .0001); Hadj/Vadj ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0 (p = .0032), respectively; and eye-tracking test results were fixation number 11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57 (p < .0001); fixation duration 2.01 ± 0.79 s vs 1.5 ± 0.4 s (p = .0013), and time to find target 24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4 (p = .0034), respectively.
Conclusions: Data showed a lower performance in oculomotor behaviour in people with long COVID-19, compared to healthy individuals. It cannot be affirmed an ocular musculature dysfunction; the differentiated behaviour could be associated to cognitive alterations affected in these people. Both tests used could be an useful tool for the clinical assessment of these participants. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these procedures.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
