YouTube™ 上腹腔镜根治性肾切除术视频的教育水平。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0175
Rıdvan Kayar, Kemal Kayar, Emre Tokuc, Emrah Özsoy, Muhammet Çiçek, Selamettin Demir, Ramazan Topaktaş
{"title":"YouTube™ 上腹腔镜根治性肾切除术视频的教育水平。","authors":"Rıdvan Kayar, Kemal Kayar, Emre Tokuc, Emrah Özsoy, Muhammet Çiçek, Selamettin Demir, Ramazan Topaktaş","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aims to evaluate the educational quality and appropriateness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube using the LAParoscopicsurgery Video EducationalGuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. It focuses on understanding the role of online resources in medical education and objectively assessing their quality. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A search was conducted on YouTube™ for \"laparoscopic radical nephrectomy\" on August 15, 2023, leading to the selection of the first 125 videos. Videos were chosen based on length (over 1 minute), content (laparoscopic radical nephrectomy), language (English), and nonindustry sponsorship. The LAP-VEGaS criteria, encompassing 16 items under five main categories: video introduction, case presentation, procedures, outcomes, and educational content, were used for evaluation, assigning 0 or 1 point per criterion. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 100 videos meeting the criteria, they were divided into two groups: personal uploads by expert surgeons (Group-1) and institutional uploads by hospitals and organizations (Group-2). Group-2 videos had longer durations and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. The transperitoneal approach was preferred in 88% of the videos, and 84% were right laparoscopic nephrectomies. Group-2 had significantly higher LAP-VEGaS scores (6.3 ± 2.2) compared with Group-1 (4 ± 2.1) (<i>P</i> < 0,001). The number of videos published over the years increased, while LAP-VEGaS scores fluctuated. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Assessing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube™ using the LAP-VEGaS criteria helped understand the role of online sources in medical education. Institutional uploads were found to be more successful in educational aspects, emphasizing the need for continuous quality review of online medical education materials. This study also guides how to evaluate and improve medical education materials on online platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Level of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy Videos on YouTube<sup>TM</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Rıdvan Kayar, Kemal Kayar, Emre Tokuc, Emrah Özsoy, Muhammet Çiçek, Selamettin Demir, Ramazan Topaktaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2024.0175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aims to evaluate the educational quality and appropriateness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube using the LAParoscopicsurgery Video EducationalGuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. It focuses on understanding the role of online resources in medical education and objectively assessing their quality. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A search was conducted on YouTube™ for \\\"laparoscopic radical nephrectomy\\\" on August 15, 2023, leading to the selection of the first 125 videos. Videos were chosen based on length (over 1 minute), content (laparoscopic radical nephrectomy), language (English), and nonindustry sponsorship. The LAP-VEGaS criteria, encompassing 16 items under five main categories: video introduction, case presentation, procedures, outcomes, and educational content, were used for evaluation, assigning 0 or 1 point per criterion. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 100 videos meeting the criteria, they were divided into two groups: personal uploads by expert surgeons (Group-1) and institutional uploads by hospitals and organizations (Group-2). Group-2 videos had longer durations and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. The transperitoneal approach was preferred in 88% of the videos, and 84% were right laparoscopic nephrectomies. Group-2 had significantly higher LAP-VEGaS scores (6.3 ± 2.2) compared with Group-1 (4 ± 2.1) (<i>P</i> < 0,001). The number of videos published over the years increased, while LAP-VEGaS scores fluctuated. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Assessing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube™ using the LAP-VEGaS criteria helped understand the role of online sources in medical education. Institutional uploads were found to be more successful in educational aspects, emphasizing the need for continuous quality review of online medical education materials. This study also guides how to evaluate and improve medical education materials on online platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在使用《腹腔镜手术视频教育指南》(LAP-VEGaS)标准评估 YouTube 上腹腔镜根治性肾切除术视频的教育质量和适当性。其重点是了解在线资源在医学教育中的作用并客观评估其质量。方法:于 2023 年 8 月 15 日在 YouTube™ 上搜索 "腹腔镜根治性肾切除术",选出前 125 个视频。选择视频的标准包括视频长度(1 分钟以上)、内容(腹腔镜根治性肾切除术)、语言(英语)和非行业赞助。LAP-VEGaS 标准包括五大类 16 个项目:视频介绍、病例展示、手术过程、结果和教育内容,采用该标准进行评估,每项标准为 0 分或 1 分。结果:在 100 个符合标准的视频中,这些视频被分为两组:由外科医生专家上传的个人视频(第一组)和由医院和机构上传的机构视频(第二组)。第 2 组视频的持续时间更长,LAP-VEGaS 评分更高。88%的视频首选经腹膜入路,84%为右腹腔镜肾切除术。第二组的 LAP-VEGaS 评分(6.3 ± 2.2)明显高于第一组(4 ± 2.1)(P < 0,001)。多年来发表的视频数量有所增加,而 LAP-VEGaS 评分却有所波动。结论使用 LAP-VEGaS 标准评估 YouTube™ 上的腹腔镜根治性肾切除术视频有助于了解在线资源在医学教育中的作用。研究发现,机构上传的视频在教育方面更为成功,这强调了对在线医学教育材料进行持续质量审查的必要性。这项研究还为如何评估和改进在线平台上的医学教育材料提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Educational Level of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy Videos on YouTubeTM.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the educational quality and appropriateness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube using the LAParoscopicsurgery Video EducationalGuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. It focuses on understanding the role of online resources in medical education and objectively assessing their quality. Methods: A search was conducted on YouTube™ for "laparoscopic radical nephrectomy" on August 15, 2023, leading to the selection of the first 125 videos. Videos were chosen based on length (over 1 minute), content (laparoscopic radical nephrectomy), language (English), and nonindustry sponsorship. The LAP-VEGaS criteria, encompassing 16 items under five main categories: video introduction, case presentation, procedures, outcomes, and educational content, were used for evaluation, assigning 0 or 1 point per criterion. Results: Out of 100 videos meeting the criteria, they were divided into two groups: personal uploads by expert surgeons (Group-1) and institutional uploads by hospitals and organizations (Group-2). Group-2 videos had longer durations and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. The transperitoneal approach was preferred in 88% of the videos, and 84% were right laparoscopic nephrectomies. Group-2 had significantly higher LAP-VEGaS scores (6.3 ± 2.2) compared with Group-1 (4 ± 2.1) (P < 0,001). The number of videos published over the years increased, while LAP-VEGaS scores fluctuated. Conclusion: Assessing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube™ using the LAP-VEGaS criteria helped understand the role of online sources in medical education. Institutional uploads were found to be more successful in educational aspects, emphasizing the need for continuous quality review of online medical education materials. This study also guides how to evaluate and improve medical education materials on online platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Emerging Topics in the Management of Diverticulitis. Evaluation and Analysis of the Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic Surgery for Pediatric Direct Inguinal Hernia. Innovative Approaches to Managing Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Scoping Review. Do Abdominoplasties in Patients with Prior Sleeve Gastrectomy Impact De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder and the Need for Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal J-Pouch-Anorectal Anastomosis in Children: Shifting to a Two Stage-Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1