全球穆斯林进行已故器官捐赠的障碍和促进因素:综合系统综述。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2024.100874
Asmaa Al-Abdulghani , Britzer Paul Vincent , Gurch Randhawa , Erica Cook , Riadh Fadhil
{"title":"全球穆斯林进行已故器官捐赠的障碍和促进因素:综合系统综述。","authors":"Asmaa Al-Abdulghani ,&nbsp;Britzer Paul Vincent ,&nbsp;Gurch Randhawa ,&nbsp;Erica Cook ,&nbsp;Riadh Fadhil","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To identify the barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among the Muslim community living globally.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic search was undertaken in databases such as CINAHL, Medline with full text, Global Health and PsycINFO via EBSCO; Scopus via Elsevier; Web of Science via Clarivate; and PubMed via US National Library of Medicine National Institute of Health were used to retrieve the studies on the 31st of December 2023. Apart from these databases two other journals, the Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, and the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Transplantation were also used to search for relevant studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies that addressed the aim of the present review published from the 30th of April 2008 were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 10,474 studies, 95 studies were included in the review. The following five themes were generated based on narrative synthesis: 1) knowledge of organ donation, 2) willingness to donate, 3) community influence, 4) bodily influence, and 5) religious influence. While individuals view organ donation as a noble act, societal influences significantly impact their decision to register. Concerns include religious permissibility, potential misuse for commercial purposes, and the dignity and respect given to the deceased donor's body.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This review finds deceased organ donation decisions in this population are collective, influenced by religious views, and hindered by uncertainty. Interventional studies on strategies to address uncertainty could help us identify best practices for this population to improve deceased organ donation. Rather than an individual approach among this population, a whole-system approach, tailored-made evidence-guided community engagement could improve donation rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 100874"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000570/pdfft?md5=17dfd1c068f85138d6c7e54e7dcb56f3&pid=1-s2.0-S0955470X24000570-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among Muslims living globally: An integrative systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Asmaa Al-Abdulghani ,&nbsp;Britzer Paul Vincent ,&nbsp;Gurch Randhawa ,&nbsp;Erica Cook ,&nbsp;Riadh Fadhil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To identify the barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among the Muslim community living globally.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic search was undertaken in databases such as CINAHL, Medline with full text, Global Health and PsycINFO via EBSCO; Scopus via Elsevier; Web of Science via Clarivate; and PubMed via US National Library of Medicine National Institute of Health were used to retrieve the studies on the 31st of December 2023. Apart from these databases two other journals, the Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, and the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Transplantation were also used to search for relevant studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies that addressed the aim of the present review published from the 30th of April 2008 were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 10,474 studies, 95 studies were included in the review. The following five themes were generated based on narrative synthesis: 1) knowledge of organ donation, 2) willingness to donate, 3) community influence, 4) bodily influence, and 5) religious influence. While individuals view organ donation as a noble act, societal influences significantly impact their decision to register. Concerns include religious permissibility, potential misuse for commercial purposes, and the dignity and respect given to the deceased donor's body.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This review finds deceased organ donation decisions in this population are collective, influenced by religious views, and hindered by uncertainty. Interventional studies on strategies to address uncertainty could help us identify best practices for this population to improve deceased organ donation. Rather than an individual approach among this population, a whole-system approach, tailored-made evidence-guided community engagement could improve donation rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100874\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000570/pdfft?md5=17dfd1c068f85138d6c7e54e7dcb56f3&pid=1-s2.0-S0955470X24000570-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000570\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定全球穆斯林群体中已故器官捐赠的障碍和促进因素:在 EBSCO 的 CINAHL、Medline 全文、Global Health 和 PsycINFO;Elsevier 的 Scopus;Clarivate 的 Web of Science;以及美国国家医学图书馆国家健康研究所的 PubMed 等数据库中进行了系统搜索,以检索截至 2023 年 12 月 31 日的研究。除这些数据库外,还使用了另外两个期刊,即《沙特肾脏疾病与移植期刊》和《实验与临床移植期刊》来搜索相关研究。2008年4月30日以来发表的与本综述目的相关的定量和定性研究均被纳入其中:结果:在 10,474 项研究中,有 95 项研究被纳入综述。根据叙事综合得出以下五个主题:1)器官捐献知识;2)捐献意愿;3)社区影响;4)身体影响;5)宗教影响。虽然个人认为器官捐献是一种高尚的行为,但社会影响对他们登记的决定产生了重大影响。关注的问题包括宗教允许性、出于商业目的的潜在滥用,以及给予已故捐赠者身体的尊严和尊重:本综述发现,在这一人群中,已故器官捐献决定是集体性的,受到宗教观点的影响,并受到不确定性的阻碍。对解决不确定性的策略进行干预性研究可帮助我们确定适用于这一人群的最佳做法,以改善已故器官捐献。与其在这一人群中采取单独的方法,不如采取全系统的方法,通过量身定制的、以证据为指导的社区参与来提高捐献率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among Muslims living globally: An integrative systematic review

Aim

To identify the barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among the Muslim community living globally.

Method

A systematic search was undertaken in databases such as CINAHL, Medline with full text, Global Health and PsycINFO via EBSCO; Scopus via Elsevier; Web of Science via Clarivate; and PubMed via US National Library of Medicine National Institute of Health were used to retrieve the studies on the 31st of December 2023. Apart from these databases two other journals, the Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, and the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Transplantation were also used to search for relevant studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies that addressed the aim of the present review published from the 30th of April 2008 were included.

Results

Of the 10,474 studies, 95 studies were included in the review. The following five themes were generated based on narrative synthesis: 1) knowledge of organ donation, 2) willingness to donate, 3) community influence, 4) bodily influence, and 5) religious influence. While individuals view organ donation as a noble act, societal influences significantly impact their decision to register. Concerns include religious permissibility, potential misuse for commercial purposes, and the dignity and respect given to the deceased donor's body.

Conclusions

This review finds deceased organ donation decisions in this population are collective, influenced by religious views, and hindered by uncertainty. Interventional studies on strategies to address uncertainty could help us identify best practices for this population to improve deceased organ donation. Rather than an individual approach among this population, a whole-system approach, tailored-made evidence-guided community engagement could improve donation rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
期刊最新文献
Complement and complement regulatory protein in allogeneic and xenogeneic kidney transplantation Frailty serves as an adverse predictor for mortality in liver transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis Outcomes of kidney replacement therapies after kidney transplant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: Current therapeutic and screening strategies Factors and interventions affecting tacrolimus intrapatient variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1