加强农村老年人交通服务:沟通客户与提供者的观点

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101175
Jie Yu , Yue Liu , Edward Beimborn
{"title":"加强农村老年人交通服务:沟通客户与提供者的观点","authors":"Jie Yu ,&nbsp;Yue Liu ,&nbsp;Edward Beimborn","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rural older adults reliant on transportation services represent an historically underserved demographic, yet their specific service needs remain inadequately understood. This study aims to explore important rural transportation service features for senior customers while identifying service gaps and potential misconceptions between senior customers and service providers. Utilizing data from a cross-sectional service survey in rural Wisconsin, 13 important service features were identified by both senior customers and service providers, and grouped into three categories—basic, technological, and special—via exploratory factor analysis. While consensus existed between seniors and providers on the primary importance of basic features, seniors attributed greater significance to technological aspects than service providers anticipated. Differing preferences surfaced between seniors and providers regarding special features. Statistical tests revealed the substantial importance of basic features, particularly among older females, individuals with mobility constraints, and limited leisure activity. Moreover, technological features received higher ratings from older females, younger individuals, and those with internet access. Varied attention towards special features aligned with diverse older adult needs. Service providers, regardless of their characteristics, exhibited consistent prioritization of service features. Our findings emphasize opportunities for rural transport service providers to better serve senior users by enhancing basic service provisions, embracing age-friendly technologies, and tailoring specialized services to meet distinct user requirements within local contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing rural transportation services for older adults: Bridging customer-provider perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Jie Yu ,&nbsp;Yue Liu ,&nbsp;Edward Beimborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rural older adults reliant on transportation services represent an historically underserved demographic, yet their specific service needs remain inadequately understood. This study aims to explore important rural transportation service features for senior customers while identifying service gaps and potential misconceptions between senior customers and service providers. Utilizing data from a cross-sectional service survey in rural Wisconsin, 13 important service features were identified by both senior customers and service providers, and grouped into three categories—basic, technological, and special—via exploratory factor analysis. While consensus existed between seniors and providers on the primary importance of basic features, seniors attributed greater significance to technological aspects than service providers anticipated. Differing preferences surfaced between seniors and providers regarding special features. Statistical tests revealed the substantial importance of basic features, particularly among older females, individuals with mobility constraints, and limited leisure activity. Moreover, technological features received higher ratings from older females, younger individuals, and those with internet access. Varied attention towards special features aligned with diverse older adult needs. Service providers, regardless of their characteristics, exhibited consistent prioritization of service features. Our findings emphasize opportunities for rural transport service providers to better serve senior users by enhancing basic service provisions, embracing age-friendly technologies, and tailoring specialized services to meet distinct user requirements within local contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000774\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

依赖交通服务的农村老年人是历来得不到充分服务的人群,但他们的具体服务需求仍未得到充分了解。本研究旨在探讨农村老年人交通服务的重要特点,同时找出服务差距以及老年人和服务提供商之间可能存在的误解。利用威斯康星州农村地区横断面服务调查的数据,老年顾客和服务提供者共同确定了 13 项重要服务特征,并通过探索性因素分析将其分为基本、技术和特殊三个类别。虽然老年人和服务提供者对基本特征的首要重要性达成了共识,但老年人对技术方面的重视程度超出了服务提供者的预期。在特殊功能方面,老年人和服务提供者的偏好有所不同。统计测试表明,基本功能非常重要,尤其是在老年女性、行动不便者和休闲活动有限者中。此外,老年女性、年轻人和能上网的人对技术功能的评价较高。对特殊功能的不同关注符合老年人的不同需求。无论服务提供者的特点如何,他们对服务功能的优先排序都是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,农村交通服务提供商有机会通过加强基本服务、采用适合老年人的技术以及定制专门服务来更好地为老年用户服务,以满足当地用户的不同需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing rural transportation services for older adults: Bridging customer-provider perspectives

Rural older adults reliant on transportation services represent an historically underserved demographic, yet their specific service needs remain inadequately understood. This study aims to explore important rural transportation service features for senior customers while identifying service gaps and potential misconceptions between senior customers and service providers. Utilizing data from a cross-sectional service survey in rural Wisconsin, 13 important service features were identified by both senior customers and service providers, and grouped into three categories—basic, technological, and special—via exploratory factor analysis. While consensus existed between seniors and providers on the primary importance of basic features, seniors attributed greater significance to technological aspects than service providers anticipated. Differing preferences surfaced between seniors and providers regarding special features. Statistical tests revealed the substantial importance of basic features, particularly among older females, individuals with mobility constraints, and limited leisure activity. Moreover, technological features received higher ratings from older females, younger individuals, and those with internet access. Varied attention towards special features aligned with diverse older adult needs. Service providers, regardless of their characteristics, exhibited consistent prioritization of service features. Our findings emphasize opportunities for rural transport service providers to better serve senior users by enhancing basic service provisions, embracing age-friendly technologies, and tailoring specialized services to meet distinct user requirements within local contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Air-rail intermodal collaborative decision making for aircraft recovery from airport station disruption Evaluation of intermodal transport chain: Case of importing tires through a China-Balkans routes Promoting sustainable usage behavior in the sharing economy business model: A study based on bike-sharing Can high-speed rail promote regional technological innovation? An explanation based on city network centrality Do Chilean cities have the right set of public transport modes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1