在团队中建立信任:通过团队分担工作让不太自觉的团队成员参与进来

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Group & Organization Management Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/10596011241270003
Priti Pradhan Shah, Stephen L. Jones, Jin Park
{"title":"在团队中建立信任:通过团队分担工作让不太自觉的团队成员参与进来","authors":"Priti Pradhan Shah, Stephen L. Jones, Jin Park","doi":"10.1177/10596011241270003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Members of teams act as trustors, judging the trustworthiness of their teammates who are the trustees or targets of trust. Trustees who are less conscientious may be viewed as less trustworthy. But, we identify a team-based solution to engage less-conscientious teammates, which removes the adverse influence of low conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness. Study 1 finds that team members have, on average, higher perceptions of their teammates’ trustworthiness when workload in the team is equitably shared and not imbalanced. Furthermore, it suggests that team workload sharing provides a way to ameliorate a lack of trust in low conscientious teammates. That is, team workload sharing moderates the link between trustee conscientiousness and perceived trustworthiness: in teams with high levels of workload sharing, less conscientious trustees are judged to be as trustworthy as their more conscientious peers. Study 2 replicates these findings and, unlike Study 1, it provides a clear main effect of trustee conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness, and it reveals differences in the magnitude of the hypothesized effects at different periods of a team’s existence and for different dimensions of perceived trustworthiness. We conclude by suggesting strategies that can increase perceptions of trustworthiness within firms by using team processes that promote trustworthy behaviors.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Trust in Teams: Engaging Less Conscientious Team Members through Team Workload-Sharing\",\"authors\":\"Priti Pradhan Shah, Stephen L. Jones, Jin Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10596011241270003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Members of teams act as trustors, judging the trustworthiness of their teammates who are the trustees or targets of trust. Trustees who are less conscientious may be viewed as less trustworthy. But, we identify a team-based solution to engage less-conscientious teammates, which removes the adverse influence of low conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness. Study 1 finds that team members have, on average, higher perceptions of their teammates’ trustworthiness when workload in the team is equitably shared and not imbalanced. Furthermore, it suggests that team workload sharing provides a way to ameliorate a lack of trust in low conscientious teammates. That is, team workload sharing moderates the link between trustee conscientiousness and perceived trustworthiness: in teams with high levels of workload sharing, less conscientious trustees are judged to be as trustworthy as their more conscientious peers. Study 2 replicates these findings and, unlike Study 1, it provides a clear main effect of trustee conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness, and it reveals differences in the magnitude of the hypothesized effects at different periods of a team’s existence and for different dimensions of perceived trustworthiness. We conclude by suggesting strategies that can increase perceptions of trustworthiness within firms by using team processes that promote trustworthy behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Group & Organization Management\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Group & Organization Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241270003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241270003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

团队成员充当信任者,判断作为受托人或信任对象的队友是否值得信任。自觉性较差的受托人可能会被认为不太值得信任。但是,我们发现了一种基于团队的解决方案,可以让自觉性较低的队友参与进来,从而消除自觉性较低对感知可信度的不利影响。研究 1 发现,当团队中的工作量得到公平分担而不是不平衡时,团队成员对其队友的可信度平均有更高的感知。此外,研究还表明,团队工作量分担提供了一种改善对低自觉性队友缺乏信任的方法。也就是说,团队工作量分担调节了受托人自觉性与感知可信度之间的联系:在工作量分担程度较高的团队中,自觉性较低的受托人被认为与自觉性较高的同伴一样值得信任。研究 2 复制了这些发现,与研究 1 不同的是,它提供了受托人自觉性对感知可信度的明确主效应,并揭示了假设效应在团队存在的不同时期和感知可信度的不同维度上的大小差异。最后,我们提出了一些策略,这些策略可以通过使用促进可信赖行为的团队流程来提高企业内部的可信赖感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building Trust in Teams: Engaging Less Conscientious Team Members through Team Workload-Sharing
Members of teams act as trustors, judging the trustworthiness of their teammates who are the trustees or targets of trust. Trustees who are less conscientious may be viewed as less trustworthy. But, we identify a team-based solution to engage less-conscientious teammates, which removes the adverse influence of low conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness. Study 1 finds that team members have, on average, higher perceptions of their teammates’ trustworthiness when workload in the team is equitably shared and not imbalanced. Furthermore, it suggests that team workload sharing provides a way to ameliorate a lack of trust in low conscientious teammates. That is, team workload sharing moderates the link between trustee conscientiousness and perceived trustworthiness: in teams with high levels of workload sharing, less conscientious trustees are judged to be as trustworthy as their more conscientious peers. Study 2 replicates these findings and, unlike Study 1, it provides a clear main effect of trustee conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness, and it reveals differences in the magnitude of the hypothesized effects at different periods of a team’s existence and for different dimensions of perceived trustworthiness. We conclude by suggesting strategies that can increase perceptions of trustworthiness within firms by using team processes that promote trustworthy behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Drivers for Nominating First Women Executives: Empirical Evidence From Japanese Firms The Value of Small Samples to Groups and Teams Research: Accumulating Knowledge across Philosophies of Science It’s About Time! Understanding the Dynamic Team Process-Performance Relationship Using Micro- and Macroscale Time Lenses Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare When Does Entrepreneurs’ Impression Management Enhance Their Networking Performance? The Cross-Level Moderating Role of Collective Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1