PRIME-NL 研究:在动态环境中评估针对帕金森病患者的复杂医疗干预措施

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03778-x
Bart R. Maas, Robin van den Bergh, Sanne W. van den Berg, Eveline Hulstein, Niek Stadhouders, Patrick P.T. Jeurissen, Nienke M. de Vries, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Marten Munneke, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Sirwan K.L. Darweesh
{"title":"PRIME-NL 研究:在动态环境中评估针对帕金森病患者的复杂医疗干预措施","authors":"Bart R. Maas, Robin van den Bergh, Sanne W. van den Berg, Eveline Hulstein, Niek Stadhouders, Patrick P.T. Jeurissen, Nienke M. de Vries, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Marten Munneke, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Sirwan K.L. Darweesh","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03778-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An innovative, integrative care model for people with Parkinson (PRIME Parkinson) has gradually been implemented in a selected region of the Netherlands since 2021. A prospective evaluation of this model (PRIME-NL study) was initiated in parallel, spanning the year prior to implementation (baseline) and the implementation period. Following publication of the original study protocol, the COVID-19 crisis delayed implementation of the full PRIME Parkinson care model by two years and hampered the recruitment of study participants. To describe which methodological adjustments were made to the study protocol because of these developments. We compare various outcomes between a region where PRIME Parkinson care was implemented (innovation region) versus the rest of the Netherlands (usual care region). We use healthcare claims data of virtually all people with Parkinson in the Netherlands and annual questionnaires in a representative subsample of 984 people with Parkinson, 566 caregivers and 192 healthcare professionals. Four major methodological adjustments had to be made since publication of the original protocol. First, we extended the evaluation period by two years. Second, we incorporated annual process measures of the stage of implementation of the new care model. Third, we introduced a real-time iterative feedback loop of interim results to relevant stakeholders. Fourth, we updated the statistical analysis plan. This manuscript provides transparency in how the design and analyses of the evaluation study had to be adapted to control for external influences in a dynamic environment, including eruption of the COVID-19 crisis. Our solutions could serve as a template for evaluating other complex healthcare interventions in a dynamic environment.","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The PRIME-NL study: evaluating a complex healthcare intervention for people with Parkinson’s disease in a dynamic environment\",\"authors\":\"Bart R. Maas, Robin van den Bergh, Sanne W. van den Berg, Eveline Hulstein, Niek Stadhouders, Patrick P.T. Jeurissen, Nienke M. de Vries, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Marten Munneke, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Sirwan K.L. Darweesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-024-03778-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An innovative, integrative care model for people with Parkinson (PRIME Parkinson) has gradually been implemented in a selected region of the Netherlands since 2021. A prospective evaluation of this model (PRIME-NL study) was initiated in parallel, spanning the year prior to implementation (baseline) and the implementation period. Following publication of the original study protocol, the COVID-19 crisis delayed implementation of the full PRIME Parkinson care model by two years and hampered the recruitment of study participants. To describe which methodological adjustments were made to the study protocol because of these developments. We compare various outcomes between a region where PRIME Parkinson care was implemented (innovation region) versus the rest of the Netherlands (usual care region). We use healthcare claims data of virtually all people with Parkinson in the Netherlands and annual questionnaires in a representative subsample of 984 people with Parkinson, 566 caregivers and 192 healthcare professionals. Four major methodological adjustments had to be made since publication of the original protocol. First, we extended the evaluation period by two years. Second, we incorporated annual process measures of the stage of implementation of the new care model. Third, we introduced a real-time iterative feedback loop of interim results to relevant stakeholders. Fourth, we updated the statistical analysis plan. This manuscript provides transparency in how the design and analyses of the evaluation study had to be adapted to control for external influences in a dynamic environment, including eruption of the COVID-19 crisis. Our solutions could serve as a template for evaluating other complex healthcare interventions in a dynamic environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03778-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03778-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2021 年起,一种针对帕金森患者的创新型综合护理模式(PRIME 帕金森)在荷兰的部分地区逐步实施。与此同时,还启动了对该模式的前瞻性评估(PRIME-NL 研究),时间跨度为实施前一年(基线)和实施期间。最初的研究方案公布后,COVID-19 危机将 PRIME 帕金森病护理模式的全面实施推迟了两年,并阻碍了研究参与者的招募。为了描述由于这些事态发展而对研究方案进行的方法调整。我们比较了实施 PRIME 帕金森病护理的地区(创新地区)与荷兰其他地区(常规护理地区)的各种结果。我们使用了荷兰几乎所有帕金森患者的医疗报销数据,并对具有代表性的984名帕金森患者、566名护理人员和192名医疗专业人员进行了年度问卷调查。自原始方案发布以来,我们不得不对方法进行了四项重大调整。首先,我们将评估期延长了两年。其次,我们纳入了新护理模式实施阶段的年度过程测量。第三,我们将中期结果实时迭代反馈给相关利益方。第四,我们更新了统计分析计划。这篇手稿透明地展示了评估研究的设计和分析是如何在一个动态的环境中(包括 COVID-19 危机的爆发)进行调整以控制外部影响的。我们的解决方案可作为在动态环境中评估其他复杂医疗干预措施的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The PRIME-NL study: evaluating a complex healthcare intervention for people with Parkinson’s disease in a dynamic environment
An innovative, integrative care model for people with Parkinson (PRIME Parkinson) has gradually been implemented in a selected region of the Netherlands since 2021. A prospective evaluation of this model (PRIME-NL study) was initiated in parallel, spanning the year prior to implementation (baseline) and the implementation period. Following publication of the original study protocol, the COVID-19 crisis delayed implementation of the full PRIME Parkinson care model by two years and hampered the recruitment of study participants. To describe which methodological adjustments were made to the study protocol because of these developments. We compare various outcomes between a region where PRIME Parkinson care was implemented (innovation region) versus the rest of the Netherlands (usual care region). We use healthcare claims data of virtually all people with Parkinson in the Netherlands and annual questionnaires in a representative subsample of 984 people with Parkinson, 566 caregivers and 192 healthcare professionals. Four major methodological adjustments had to be made since publication of the original protocol. First, we extended the evaluation period by two years. Second, we incorporated annual process measures of the stage of implementation of the new care model. Third, we introduced a real-time iterative feedback loop of interim results to relevant stakeholders. Fourth, we updated the statistical analysis plan. This manuscript provides transparency in how the design and analyses of the evaluation study had to be adapted to control for external influences in a dynamic environment, including eruption of the COVID-19 crisis. Our solutions could serve as a template for evaluating other complex healthcare interventions in a dynamic environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases: a cross-sectional retrospective study The relationship between HbA1c and the activities of daily living in complex chronic patients with and without intracerebral hemorrhage Brain abscesses: the first report of disseminated Nocardia beijingensis infection in an immunocompetent individual in China Energy metabolism-related GLUD1 contributes to favorable clinical outcomes of IDH-mutant glioma Pharmacological and physiological effects of cannabidiol: a dose escalation, placebo washout study protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1