利用深度学习对自动初选进行微调的工作流程

IF 1.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Near Surface Geophysics Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1002/nsg.12316
Amir Mardan, Martin Blouin, Gabriel Fabien‐Ouellet, Bernard Giroux, Christophe Vergniault, Jeremy Gendreau
{"title":"利用深度学习对自动初选进行微调的工作流程","authors":"Amir Mardan, Martin Blouin, Gabriel Fabien‐Ouellet, Bernard Giroux, Christophe Vergniault, Jeremy Gendreau","doi":"10.1002/nsg.12316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First‐break picking is an essential step in seismic data processing. For reliable results, first arrivals should be picked by an expert. This is a time‐consuming procedure and subjective to a certain degree, leading to different results for different operators. In this study, we have used a U‐Net architecture with residual blocks to perform automatic first‐break picking based on deep learning. Focusing on the effects of weight initialization on first‐break picking, we conduct this research by using the weights of a pre‐trained network that is used for object detection on the ImageNet dataset. The efficiency of the proposed method is tested on two real datasets. For both datasets, we pick manually the first breaks for less than 10 of the seismic shots. The pre‐trained network is fine‐tuned on the picked shots, and the rest of the shots are automatically picked by the neural network. It is shown that this strategy allows to reduce the size of the training set, requiring fine‐tuning with only a few picked shots per survey. Using random weights and more training epochs can lead to a lower training loss, but such a strategy leads to overfitting as the test error is higher than the one of the pre‐trained network. We also assess the possibility of using a general dataset by training a network with data from three different projects that are acquired with different equipment and at different locations. This study shows that if the general dataset is created carefully it can lead to more accurate first‐break picking; otherwise, the general dataset can decrease the accuracy. Focusing on near‐surface geophysics, we perform traveltime tomography and compare the inverted velocity models based on different first‐break picking methodologies. The results of the inversion show that the first breaks obtained by the pre‐trained network lead to a velocity model that is closer to the one obtained from the inversion of expert‐picked first breaks.","PeriodicalId":49771,"journal":{"name":"Near Surface Geophysics","volume":"182 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fine‐tuning workflow for automatic first‐break picking with deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Amir Mardan, Martin Blouin, Gabriel Fabien‐Ouellet, Bernard Giroux, Christophe Vergniault, Jeremy Gendreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nsg.12316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First‐break picking is an essential step in seismic data processing. For reliable results, first arrivals should be picked by an expert. This is a time‐consuming procedure and subjective to a certain degree, leading to different results for different operators. In this study, we have used a U‐Net architecture with residual blocks to perform automatic first‐break picking based on deep learning. Focusing on the effects of weight initialization on first‐break picking, we conduct this research by using the weights of a pre‐trained network that is used for object detection on the ImageNet dataset. The efficiency of the proposed method is tested on two real datasets. For both datasets, we pick manually the first breaks for less than 10 of the seismic shots. The pre‐trained network is fine‐tuned on the picked shots, and the rest of the shots are automatically picked by the neural network. It is shown that this strategy allows to reduce the size of the training set, requiring fine‐tuning with only a few picked shots per survey. Using random weights and more training epochs can lead to a lower training loss, but such a strategy leads to overfitting as the test error is higher than the one of the pre‐trained network. We also assess the possibility of using a general dataset by training a network with data from three different projects that are acquired with different equipment and at different locations. This study shows that if the general dataset is created carefully it can lead to more accurate first‐break picking; otherwise, the general dataset can decrease the accuracy. Focusing on near‐surface geophysics, we perform traveltime tomography and compare the inverted velocity models based on different first‐break picking methodologies. The results of the inversion show that the first breaks obtained by the pre‐trained network lead to a velocity model that is closer to the one obtained from the inversion of expert‐picked first breaks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Near Surface Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"182 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Near Surface Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Near Surface Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初至选取是地震数据处理的重要步骤。为了获得可靠的结果,初至应由专家挑选。这是一个耗时的过程,而且在一定程度上具有主观性,会导致不同操作员得到不同的结果。在这项研究中,我们使用了带有残差块的 U-Net 架构,基于深度学习来执行自动初至选取。针对权重初始化对初选的影响,我们使用在 ImageNet 数据集上用于物体检测的预训练网络的权重进行了研究。我们在两个真实数据集上测试了所提方法的效率。在这两个数据集中,我们手动选取了不到 10 个地震镜头的第一个断点。预先训练好的网络会对选取的地震道进行微调,其余地震道则由神经网络自动选取。结果表明,这种策略可以减少训练集的大小,每次勘测只需要微调几个选取的地震道。使用随机权重和更多的训练历元可以降低训练损失,但这种策略会导致过度拟合,因为测试误差高于预训练网络的误差。我们还评估了使用通用数据集的可能性,用三个不同项目的数据对网络进行了训练,这些数据是用不同设备在不同地点采集的。这项研究表明,如果精心创建通用数据集,就能提高初至选取的准确性;反之,通用数据集则会降低准确性。以近地表地球物理为重点,我们进行了旅行时间层析成像,并比较了基于不同初至选取方法的反演速度模型。反演结果表明,通过预训练网络获得的初至值所得到的速度模型更接近于通过专家挑选的初至值反演得到的速度模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A fine‐tuning workflow for automatic first‐break picking with deep learning
First‐break picking is an essential step in seismic data processing. For reliable results, first arrivals should be picked by an expert. This is a time‐consuming procedure and subjective to a certain degree, leading to different results for different operators. In this study, we have used a U‐Net architecture with residual blocks to perform automatic first‐break picking based on deep learning. Focusing on the effects of weight initialization on first‐break picking, we conduct this research by using the weights of a pre‐trained network that is used for object detection on the ImageNet dataset. The efficiency of the proposed method is tested on two real datasets. For both datasets, we pick manually the first breaks for less than 10 of the seismic shots. The pre‐trained network is fine‐tuned on the picked shots, and the rest of the shots are automatically picked by the neural network. It is shown that this strategy allows to reduce the size of the training set, requiring fine‐tuning with only a few picked shots per survey. Using random weights and more training epochs can lead to a lower training loss, but such a strategy leads to overfitting as the test error is higher than the one of the pre‐trained network. We also assess the possibility of using a general dataset by training a network with data from three different projects that are acquired with different equipment and at different locations. This study shows that if the general dataset is created carefully it can lead to more accurate first‐break picking; otherwise, the general dataset can decrease the accuracy. Focusing on near‐surface geophysics, we perform traveltime tomography and compare the inverted velocity models based on different first‐break picking methodologies. The results of the inversion show that the first breaks obtained by the pre‐trained network lead to a velocity model that is closer to the one obtained from the inversion of expert‐picked first breaks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Near Surface Geophysics
Near Surface Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Near Surface Geophysics is an international journal for the publication of research and development in geophysics applied to near surface. It places emphasis on geological, hydrogeological, geotechnical, environmental, engineering, mining, archaeological, agricultural and other applications of geophysics as well as physical soil and rock properties. Geophysical and geoscientific case histories with innovative use of geophysical techniques are welcome, which may include improvements on instrumentation, measurements, data acquisition and processing, modelling, inversion, interpretation, project management and multidisciplinary use. The papers should also be understandable to those who use geophysical data but are not necessarily geophysicists.
期刊最新文献
High‐resolution surface‐wave‐constrained mapping of sparse dynamic cone penetrometer tests Application of iterative elastic reverse time migration to shear horizontal ultrasonic echo data obtained at a concrete step specimen A fine‐tuning workflow for automatic first‐break picking with deep learning Experimental and numerical analysis of dielectric polarization effects in near‐surface earth materials in the 100 Hz–10 MHz frequency range: First interpretation paths Bayesian inversion and uncertainty analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1