{"title":"利用分割实时迁移实现位置保护图遍历","authors":"Rong Chen;Xingda Wei;Xiating Xie;Haibo Chen","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3436828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph models many real-world data like social, transportation, biology, and communication data. Hence, graph traversal including multi-hop or graph-walking queries has been the key operation atop graph stores. However, since different graph traversals may touch different sets of vertices, it is hard or even impossible to have a one-size-fits-all graph partitioning algorithm that preserves access locality for various graph traversal workloads. Meanwhile, prior shard-based migration faces a dilemma such that coarse-grained migration may incur more migration overhead over increased locality benefits, while fine-grained migration usually requires excessive metadata and incurs non-trivial maintenance costs. We present Pragh, an efficient locality-preserving live graph migration scheme for graph stores in the form of key-value pairs. The key idea of Pragh is a split migration model that only migrates values physically while retaining keys in the initial location. This allows fine-grained migration while avoiding the need to maintain excessive metadata. Pragh integrates an RDMA-friendly location cache from DrTM-KV to provide fully-localized access to migrated data and further makes a novel reuse of the cache replacement policy for lightweight monitoring. Pragh further supports evolving graphs through a check-and-forward mechanism to resolve the conflict between updates and migration of graph data. Evaluations on an 8-node RDMA-capable cluster (100 Gbps) using a representative graph traversal benchmark show that Pragh can increase the throughput by up to 19× and decrease the median latency by up to 94%, thanks to split live migration that eliminates 97% remote accesses. A port of split live migration to Wukong shows up to 2.53× throughput improvement on representative workloads like LUBM-10240, thanks to a reduction of 88% remote accesses. This further confirms the effectiveness and generality of Pragh. Finally, though Pragh focuses on RDMA-based graph traversal, we show its generality by extending it to support graph traversals under traditional networking. Evaluations on the graph traversal benchmarks and graph query workloads on the same cluster but with 10 Gbps TCP/IP network further confirm its effectiveness without RDMA. Specifically, when evaluating on the LUBM-10240, Wukong-TCP with Pragh can achieve up to 1.87× throughput improvement with a 56% decrease in remote accesses.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":"35 10","pages":"1810-1825"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locality-Preserving Graph Traversal With Split Live Migration\",\"authors\":\"Rong Chen;Xingda Wei;Xiating Xie;Haibo Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3436828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graph models many real-world data like social, transportation, biology, and communication data. Hence, graph traversal including multi-hop or graph-walking queries has been the key operation atop graph stores. However, since different graph traversals may touch different sets of vertices, it is hard or even impossible to have a one-size-fits-all graph partitioning algorithm that preserves access locality for various graph traversal workloads. Meanwhile, prior shard-based migration faces a dilemma such that coarse-grained migration may incur more migration overhead over increased locality benefits, while fine-grained migration usually requires excessive metadata and incurs non-trivial maintenance costs. We present Pragh, an efficient locality-preserving live graph migration scheme for graph stores in the form of key-value pairs. The key idea of Pragh is a split migration model that only migrates values physically while retaining keys in the initial location. This allows fine-grained migration while avoiding the need to maintain excessive metadata. Pragh integrates an RDMA-friendly location cache from DrTM-KV to provide fully-localized access to migrated data and further makes a novel reuse of the cache replacement policy for lightweight monitoring. Pragh further supports evolving graphs through a check-and-forward mechanism to resolve the conflict between updates and migration of graph data. Evaluations on an 8-node RDMA-capable cluster (100 Gbps) using a representative graph traversal benchmark show that Pragh can increase the throughput by up to 19× and decrease the median latency by up to 94%, thanks to split live migration that eliminates 97% remote accesses. A port of split live migration to Wukong shows up to 2.53× throughput improvement on representative workloads like LUBM-10240, thanks to a reduction of 88% remote accesses. This further confirms the effectiveness and generality of Pragh. Finally, though Pragh focuses on RDMA-based graph traversal, we show its generality by extending it to support graph traversals under traditional networking. Evaluations on the graph traversal benchmarks and graph query workloads on the same cluster but with 10 Gbps TCP/IP network further confirm its effectiveness without RDMA. Specifically, when evaluating on the LUBM-10240, Wukong-TCP with Pragh can achieve up to 1.87× throughput improvement with a 56% decrease in remote accesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\",\"volume\":\"35 10\",\"pages\":\"1810-1825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10620406/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10620406/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Locality-Preserving Graph Traversal With Split Live Migration
Graph models many real-world data like social, transportation, biology, and communication data. Hence, graph traversal including multi-hop or graph-walking queries has been the key operation atop graph stores. However, since different graph traversals may touch different sets of vertices, it is hard or even impossible to have a one-size-fits-all graph partitioning algorithm that preserves access locality for various graph traversal workloads. Meanwhile, prior shard-based migration faces a dilemma such that coarse-grained migration may incur more migration overhead over increased locality benefits, while fine-grained migration usually requires excessive metadata and incurs non-trivial maintenance costs. We present Pragh, an efficient locality-preserving live graph migration scheme for graph stores in the form of key-value pairs. The key idea of Pragh is a split migration model that only migrates values physically while retaining keys in the initial location. This allows fine-grained migration while avoiding the need to maintain excessive metadata. Pragh integrates an RDMA-friendly location cache from DrTM-KV to provide fully-localized access to migrated data and further makes a novel reuse of the cache replacement policy for lightweight monitoring. Pragh further supports evolving graphs through a check-and-forward mechanism to resolve the conflict between updates and migration of graph data. Evaluations on an 8-node RDMA-capable cluster (100 Gbps) using a representative graph traversal benchmark show that Pragh can increase the throughput by up to 19× and decrease the median latency by up to 94%, thanks to split live migration that eliminates 97% remote accesses. A port of split live migration to Wukong shows up to 2.53× throughput improvement on representative workloads like LUBM-10240, thanks to a reduction of 88% remote accesses. This further confirms the effectiveness and generality of Pragh. Finally, though Pragh focuses on RDMA-based graph traversal, we show its generality by extending it to support graph traversals under traditional networking. Evaluations on the graph traversal benchmarks and graph query workloads on the same cluster but with 10 Gbps TCP/IP network further confirm its effectiveness without RDMA. Specifically, when evaluating on the LUBM-10240, Wukong-TCP with Pragh can achieve up to 1.87× throughput improvement with a 56% decrease in remote accesses.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.