在海洋经济核算中衡量海洋和沿海地区旅游业价值的替代方法

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Marine Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106299
{"title":"在海洋经济核算中衡量海洋和沿海地区旅游业价值的替代方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Marine and coastal tourism is often cited as one of the dominant sectors within many ocean economies in terms of economic contribution and number of persons employed. Despite this, discussion still arises around the definition of marine and coastal tourism in relation to the forms of activity to be included and the differences between them. Methods of valuing their economic contributions are important, not only, for accurate national accounting purposes and for international comparison but, also, for tourism planning, management and investment at national and regional levels. This paper is designed to contribute to ocean economy accounting by drawing on evidence for the Republic of Ireland that permits three different methods of valuing marine and coastal tourism to be compared and the relative merits of each to be assessed. Based on a range of criteria no one method is deemed superior. It is argued, however, that an output based NACE code approach might offer the best route to robust valuation given the comparability to the other industries in ocean economy reporting but that harmonised coastal tourism expenditure surveys could be used to get a more reliable estimate of the maritime component of the tourism related NACE activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975/pdfft?md5=e813bef4893826558866e46e71e605f7&pid=1-s2.0-S0308597X24002975-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative approaches to measuring the value of tourism in marine and coastal areas in ocean economy accounting\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Marine and coastal tourism is often cited as one of the dominant sectors within many ocean economies in terms of economic contribution and number of persons employed. Despite this, discussion still arises around the definition of marine and coastal tourism in relation to the forms of activity to be included and the differences between them. Methods of valuing their economic contributions are important, not only, for accurate national accounting purposes and for international comparison but, also, for tourism planning, management and investment at national and regional levels. This paper is designed to contribute to ocean economy accounting by drawing on evidence for the Republic of Ireland that permits three different methods of valuing marine and coastal tourism to be compared and the relative merits of each to be assessed. Based on a range of criteria no one method is deemed superior. It is argued, however, that an output based NACE code approach might offer the best route to robust valuation given the comparability to the other industries in ocean economy reporting but that harmonised coastal tourism expenditure surveys could be used to get a more reliable estimate of the maritime component of the tourism related NACE activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975/pdfft?md5=e813bef4893826558866e46e71e605f7&pid=1-s2.0-S0308597X24002975-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就经济贡献和就业人数而言,海洋和沿海旅游业常常被视为许多海洋经济体的主导 部门之一。尽管如此,围绕海洋和沿海旅游业的定义,以及应包括的活动形式和它们之间的差异,仍存在讨论。对其经济贡献进行估值的方法非常重要,这不仅是为了进行准确的国民核算和国际比 较,也是为了在国家和地区层面进行旅游规划、管理和投资。本文旨在利用爱尔兰共和国的证据,对海洋和沿海旅游业的三种不同估值方法进行比 较,并评估每种方法的相对优势,从而为海洋经济核算做出贡献。根据一系列标准,没有一种方法被认为更优越。不过,鉴于海洋经济报告中与其他行业的可比性,基于产出的 NACE 代码方法可能是实现稳健估值的最佳途径,但可以使用统一的沿海旅游支出调查,对与旅游相关的 NACE 活动中的海洋部分进行更可靠的估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternative approaches to measuring the value of tourism in marine and coastal areas in ocean economy accounting

Marine and coastal tourism is often cited as one of the dominant sectors within many ocean economies in terms of economic contribution and number of persons employed. Despite this, discussion still arises around the definition of marine and coastal tourism in relation to the forms of activity to be included and the differences between them. Methods of valuing their economic contributions are important, not only, for accurate national accounting purposes and for international comparison but, also, for tourism planning, management and investment at national and regional levels. This paper is designed to contribute to ocean economy accounting by drawing on evidence for the Republic of Ireland that permits three different methods of valuing marine and coastal tourism to be compared and the relative merits of each to be assessed. Based on a range of criteria no one method is deemed superior. It is argued, however, that an output based NACE code approach might offer the best route to robust valuation given the comparability to the other industries in ocean economy reporting but that harmonised coastal tourism expenditure surveys could be used to get a more reliable estimate of the maritime component of the tourism related NACE activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
期刊最新文献
Local perceptions of marine conservation aquaculture for the restoration of native Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Downeast, Maine The protection of submarine cables in Southeast Asia: The security gap and challenges and opportunities for regional cooperation Ensuring compliance with Antarctic environmental protection through inspections: Problems and prospects Coastal communities' perceptions on coastal erosion and the protective role of seagrass meadows in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania On the provisions of the BBNJ Agreement addressing the impacts of climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1