铁布特分类和有毒物质排放

Dakshina G. De Silva, Anita R. Schiller, Aurélie Slechten, Leonard Wolk
{"title":"铁布特分类和有毒物质排放","authors":"Dakshina G. De Silva, Anita R. Schiller, Aurélie Slechten, Leonard Wolk","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00893-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Combining detailed county-to-county migration data with Toxics Release Inventory data, and fine-scale <span>\\(\\hbox{PM}_{2.5}\\)</span> concentration levels, we investigate the relationship between internal migration, income of migrant and non-migrant households and county-level differences in environmental quality. We show that households moving to “cleaner” counties are relatively “richer”—a result consistent with a sorting by income in the spirit of Tiebout (1956). An implication of this finding is that internal migration could contribute to the persistence of disparities in pollution exposure at the county-level.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tiebout Sorting and Toxic Releases\",\"authors\":\"Dakshina G. De Silva, Anita R. Schiller, Aurélie Slechten, Leonard Wolk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10640-024-00893-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Combining detailed county-to-county migration data with Toxics Release Inventory data, and fine-scale <span>\\\\(\\\\hbox{PM}_{2.5}\\\\)</span> concentration levels, we investigate the relationship between internal migration, income of migrant and non-migrant households and county-level differences in environmental quality. We show that households moving to “cleaner” counties are relatively “richer”—a result consistent with a sorting by income in the spirit of Tiebout (1956). An implication of this finding is that internal migration could contribute to the persistence of disparities in pollution exposure at the county-level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Resource Economics\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Resource Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00893-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00893-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结合详细的县到县移民数据、有毒物质排放清单数据以及精细的浓度水平,我们研究了国内移民、移民家庭和非移民家庭的收入与县级环境质量差异之间的关系。我们发现,迁移到 "更清洁 "县城的家庭相对更 "富有"--这一结果与 Tiebout(1956 年)精神中的收入排序一致。这一发现的含义是,国内移民可能会导致县级污染暴露差异的持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tiebout Sorting and Toxic Releases

Combining detailed county-to-county migration data with Toxics Release Inventory data, and fine-scale \(\hbox{PM}_{2.5}\) concentration levels, we investigate the relationship between internal migration, income of migrant and non-migrant households and county-level differences in environmental quality. We show that households moving to “cleaner” counties are relatively “richer”—a result consistent with a sorting by income in the spirit of Tiebout (1956). An implication of this finding is that internal migration could contribute to the persistence of disparities in pollution exposure at the county-level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Local Governments Set Climate Targets: Effects of City Size and Political Costs A Lost Opportunity? Environmental Investment Tax Incentive and Energy Efficient Technologies Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment Carbon Leakage from Fuel Taxes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Exogenous Hazard Rates and Precautionary Behaviour in Resource Economic Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1