Bo Wang, Lin Wu, Pengfei Wu, Qianqian Li, Lifeng Bao, Yong Wang
{"title":"利用新型平台海洋重力仪提供的船载重力数据对测高海洋重力模型进行多维评估","authors":"Bo Wang, Lin Wu, Pengfei Wu, Qianqian Li, Lifeng Bao, Yong Wang","doi":"10.3390/jmse12081314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of satellite altimetry technology and the application of new altimetry satellites, the accuracy and resolution of altimeter-derived gravity field models have improved over the last decades. Nowadays, they are close enough to shipborne gravimetry. In this paper, multi-source shipborne gravity data in the South China Sea were taken to evaluate the accuracies of two high-precision altimeter-derived marine gravity field models (SS V30.1, DTU17). In these shipborne gravity data, there are dozens of routes’ ship gravimetry data, obtained from the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC); data were tracked from a marine survey with a commercial marine gravimeter (type KSS31M), and data were tracked from a marine gravimetry campaign that was conducted with a newly developed platform gravimeter (type JMG) in the South China Sea in September 2020. After various data filtering, processing, and calibrations, the shipborne gravity data were validated with crossover points analysis. Then, the processed shipborne data were employed to evaluate the accuracy of the altimeter-derived marine gravity field models. During this procedure, the quality of JMG shipborne gravity data was compared with the results of KSS31M and NGDC data. Analysis and evaluation results show that the crossover points verification accuracies of KSS31M and JMG are 0.70 mGal and 1.61 mGal, which are much better than the accuracy of NGDC, which is larger than 8.0 mGal. In the area where the bathymetry changes slowly, the root mean square error values between altimetry gravity models and KSS31M data are respectively 3.28 mGal and 4.54 mGal, and those of the JMG data are respectively 2.94 mGal and 2.60 mGal. According to the above results, we can conclude that the JMG has the same 1–2 mGal accuracy level as KSS31M and can meet the measurement requirements of marine gravity.","PeriodicalId":16168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional Evaluation of Altimetry Marine Gravity Models with Shipborne Gravity Data from a New Platform Marine Gravimeter\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wang, Lin Wu, Pengfei Wu, Qianqian Li, Lifeng Bao, Yong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jmse12081314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of satellite altimetry technology and the application of new altimetry satellites, the accuracy and resolution of altimeter-derived gravity field models have improved over the last decades. Nowadays, they are close enough to shipborne gravimetry. In this paper, multi-source shipborne gravity data in the South China Sea were taken to evaluate the accuracies of two high-precision altimeter-derived marine gravity field models (SS V30.1, DTU17). In these shipborne gravity data, there are dozens of routes’ ship gravimetry data, obtained from the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC); data were tracked from a marine survey with a commercial marine gravimeter (type KSS31M), and data were tracked from a marine gravimetry campaign that was conducted with a newly developed platform gravimeter (type JMG) in the South China Sea in September 2020. After various data filtering, processing, and calibrations, the shipborne gravity data were validated with crossover points analysis. Then, the processed shipborne data were employed to evaluate the accuracy of the altimeter-derived marine gravity field models. During this procedure, the quality of JMG shipborne gravity data was compared with the results of KSS31M and NGDC data. Analysis and evaluation results show that the crossover points verification accuracies of KSS31M and JMG are 0.70 mGal and 1.61 mGal, which are much better than the accuracy of NGDC, which is larger than 8.0 mGal. In the area where the bathymetry changes slowly, the root mean square error values between altimetry gravity models and KSS31M data are respectively 3.28 mGal and 4.54 mGal, and those of the JMG data are respectively 2.94 mGal and 2.60 mGal. According to the above results, we can conclude that the JMG has the same 1–2 mGal accuracy level as KSS31M and can meet the measurement requirements of marine gravity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marine Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marine Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081314\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MARINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multidimensional Evaluation of Altimetry Marine Gravity Models with Shipborne Gravity Data from a New Platform Marine Gravimeter
With the development of satellite altimetry technology and the application of new altimetry satellites, the accuracy and resolution of altimeter-derived gravity field models have improved over the last decades. Nowadays, they are close enough to shipborne gravimetry. In this paper, multi-source shipborne gravity data in the South China Sea were taken to evaluate the accuracies of two high-precision altimeter-derived marine gravity field models (SS V30.1, DTU17). In these shipborne gravity data, there are dozens of routes’ ship gravimetry data, obtained from the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC); data were tracked from a marine survey with a commercial marine gravimeter (type KSS31M), and data were tracked from a marine gravimetry campaign that was conducted with a newly developed platform gravimeter (type JMG) in the South China Sea in September 2020. After various data filtering, processing, and calibrations, the shipborne gravity data were validated with crossover points analysis. Then, the processed shipborne data were employed to evaluate the accuracy of the altimeter-derived marine gravity field models. During this procedure, the quality of JMG shipborne gravity data was compared with the results of KSS31M and NGDC data. Analysis and evaluation results show that the crossover points verification accuracies of KSS31M and JMG are 0.70 mGal and 1.61 mGal, which are much better than the accuracy of NGDC, which is larger than 8.0 mGal. In the area where the bathymetry changes slowly, the root mean square error values between altimetry gravity models and KSS31M data are respectively 3.28 mGal and 4.54 mGal, and those of the JMG data are respectively 2.94 mGal and 2.60 mGal. According to the above results, we can conclude that the JMG has the same 1–2 mGal accuracy level as KSS31M and can meet the measurement requirements of marine gravity.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (JMSE; ISSN 2077-1312) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to marine science and engineering. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.