编辑导言

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of International Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jicj/mqae024
Sareta Ashraph, Danya Chaikel, Daniela Gavshon, Kirsty Sutherland
{"title":"编辑导言","authors":"Sareta Ashraph, Danya Chaikel, Daniela Gavshon, Kirsty Sutherland","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civil society has long been a key actor in the pursuit of accountability. Moreover, civil society has often helped define what accountability is and how to achieve it. This symposium looks at various contributions made by civil society organizations to the international justice landscape. First, as pioneers in establishing international tribunals or justice mechanisms and intervening in cases before them, and secondly, through contributing to emerging alternative processes. These processes include vetting, sanctions, cases focused on civil liability of alleged perpetrators, and the establishment of People’s Tribunals. These avenues are proving to be innovative ways to fulfil many important goals of accountability, in the face of a slower-moving criminal justice system. This symposium offers diverse perspectives on civil society contributions to today’s expanding accountability efforts — provided by those working in them — as an opportunity to consider the current, and arguably shifting, justice infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":46732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors’ Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Sareta Ashraph, Danya Chaikel, Daniela Gavshon, Kirsty Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jicj/mqae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Civil society has long been a key actor in the pursuit of accountability. Moreover, civil society has often helped define what accountability is and how to achieve it. This symposium looks at various contributions made by civil society organizations to the international justice landscape. First, as pioneers in establishing international tribunals or justice mechanisms and intervening in cases before them, and secondly, through contributing to emerging alternative processes. These processes include vetting, sanctions, cases focused on civil liability of alleged perpetrators, and the establishment of People’s Tribunals. These avenues are proving to be innovative ways to fulfil many important goals of accountability, in the face of a slower-moving criminal justice system. This symposium offers diverse perspectives on civil society contributions to today’s expanding accountability efforts — provided by those working in them — as an opportunity to consider the current, and arguably shifting, justice infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqae024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqae024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,公民社会一直是实行问责制的主要行动者。此外,民间社会还经常帮助界定什么是问责以及如何实现问责。本次研讨会探讨了民间社会组织对国际司法领域做出的各种贡献。首先,作为先驱者建立国际法庭或司法机制,并介入其审理的案件;其次,为新出现的替代程序作出贡献。这些程序包括审查、制裁、侧重于被指控犯罪者民事责任的案件以及设立人民法庭。事实证明,面对进展缓慢的刑事司法系统,这些途径是实现许多重要问责目标的创新方式。本次专题讨论会提供了民间社会对当今不断扩大的问责工作所作贡献的不同视角--这些视角是由在民间社会中工作的人提供的--以此为契机,我们可以对当前的、也可以说是不断变化的司法基础设施进行思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editors’ Introduction
Civil society has long been a key actor in the pursuit of accountability. Moreover, civil society has often helped define what accountability is and how to achieve it. This symposium looks at various contributions made by civil society organizations to the international justice landscape. First, as pioneers in establishing international tribunals or justice mechanisms and intervening in cases before them, and secondly, through contributing to emerging alternative processes. These processes include vetting, sanctions, cases focused on civil liability of alleged perpetrators, and the establishment of People’s Tribunals. These avenues are proving to be innovative ways to fulfil many important goals of accountability, in the face of a slower-moving criminal justice system. This symposium offers diverse perspectives on civil society contributions to today’s expanding accountability efforts — provided by those working in them — as an opportunity to consider the current, and arguably shifting, justice infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Criminal Justice aims to promote a profound collective reflection on the new problems facing international law. Established by a group of distinguished criminal lawyers and international lawyers, the Journal addresses the major problems of justice from the angle of law, jurisprudence, criminology, penal philosophy, and the history of international judicial institutions. It is intended for graduate and post-graduate students, practitioners, academics, government officials, as well as the hundreds of people working for international criminal courts.
期刊最新文献
The Biological Weapons Amendment to the ICC Statute and National Provisions Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case Witnessing Ongwen The Ongwen Case at the International Criminal Court as a Test of the Court’s Outreach Programming in Northern Uganda Targeted Sanctions as a Pathway to Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1