Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos, Fernanda Valeriano Zamora MD, Lorhayne Kerly Capuchinho Scalioni Galvao MD, Nicole dos Santos Pimenta, João Pedro Costa Esteves Almuinha Salles, Kélen Klein Heffel MD
{"title":"生物制剂药物对儿童或青少年特应性皮炎患者的安全性和疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos, Fernanda Valeriano Zamora MD, Lorhayne Kerly Capuchinho Scalioni Galvao MD, Nicole dos Santos Pimenta, João Pedro Costa Esteves Almuinha Salles, Kélen Klein Heffel MD","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children and adolescents suffering from moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) face a significant disease burden that greatly impacts their quality of life. Treatment options for AD are currently limited. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologic drugs, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, or tralokinumab, in improving outcomes in patients with moderate to severe inadequately controlled AD. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab to placebo in patients with AD. We computed odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), random effects model was used and a <i>p</i>-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. We analysed data into Review Manager 5.4. A total of five RCTs and 973 patients were included, of whom 592 were prescribed a biologic drug. Compared with placebo, patients receiving a biologic drug had a greater improvement, achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (OR 5.05; 95% CI 3.08–8.29), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75 (OR 6.87; 95% CI 4.71–10.02), EASI 50 (OR 8.89; 95% CI 6.18–12.78) and EASI 90 (8.30; 95% CI 4.81–14.31). The proportion of patients with 3 points or more (OR 6.56; 95% CI 4.34–9.90) or 4 points or more (OR 8.09; 95% CI 5.19–12.59) improvement from baseline in peak pruritus NRS was significantly higher with biologic drugs than placebo. There were no significant differences between groups regarding adverse events (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.58–1.07), and conjunctivitis (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.00–4.33). In this meta-analysis, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab have shown significant improvements in signs, symptoms and quality of life in children or adolescents with moderate to severe AD. Larger studies may be needed to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of these biologic drugs in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"65 7","pages":"550-559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of biologic drugs in children or adolescents with atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos, Fernanda Valeriano Zamora MD, Lorhayne Kerly Capuchinho Scalioni Galvao MD, Nicole dos Santos Pimenta, João Pedro Costa Esteves Almuinha Salles, Kélen Klein Heffel MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajd.14358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Children and adolescents suffering from moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) face a significant disease burden that greatly impacts their quality of life. Treatment options for AD are currently limited. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologic drugs, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, or tralokinumab, in improving outcomes in patients with moderate to severe inadequately controlled AD. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab to placebo in patients with AD. We computed odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), random effects model was used and a <i>p</i>-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. We analysed data into Review Manager 5.4. A total of five RCTs and 973 patients were included, of whom 592 were prescribed a biologic drug. Compared with placebo, patients receiving a biologic drug had a greater improvement, achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (OR 5.05; 95% CI 3.08–8.29), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75 (OR 6.87; 95% CI 4.71–10.02), EASI 50 (OR 8.89; 95% CI 6.18–12.78) and EASI 90 (8.30; 95% CI 4.81–14.31). The proportion of patients with 3 points or more (OR 6.56; 95% CI 4.34–9.90) or 4 points or more (OR 8.09; 95% CI 5.19–12.59) improvement from baseline in peak pruritus NRS was significantly higher with biologic drugs than placebo. There were no significant differences between groups regarding adverse events (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.58–1.07), and conjunctivitis (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.00–4.33). In this meta-analysis, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab have shown significant improvements in signs, symptoms and quality of life in children or adolescents with moderate to severe AD. Larger studies may be needed to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of these biologic drugs in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"65 7\",\"pages\":\"550-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14358\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety and efficacy of biologic drugs in children or adolescents with atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Children and adolescents suffering from moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) face a significant disease burden that greatly impacts their quality of life. Treatment options for AD are currently limited. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologic drugs, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, or tralokinumab, in improving outcomes in patients with moderate to severe inadequately controlled AD. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab to placebo in patients with AD. We computed odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), random effects model was used and a p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. We analysed data into Review Manager 5.4. A total of five RCTs and 973 patients were included, of whom 592 were prescribed a biologic drug. Compared with placebo, patients receiving a biologic drug had a greater improvement, achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (OR 5.05; 95% CI 3.08–8.29), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75 (OR 6.87; 95% CI 4.71–10.02), EASI 50 (OR 8.89; 95% CI 6.18–12.78) and EASI 90 (8.30; 95% CI 4.81–14.31). The proportion of patients with 3 points or more (OR 6.56; 95% CI 4.34–9.90) or 4 points or more (OR 8.09; 95% CI 5.19–12.59) improvement from baseline in peak pruritus NRS was significantly higher with biologic drugs than placebo. There were no significant differences between groups regarding adverse events (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.58–1.07), and conjunctivitis (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.00–4.33). In this meta-analysis, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab have shown significant improvements in signs, symptoms and quality of life in children or adolescents with moderate to severe AD. Larger studies may be needed to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of these biologic drugs in this patient population.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.