用下颚磨砺牙齿......也磨砺心智!

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/joor.13826
Frank Lobbezoo, Chia-Shu Lin, Mats Trulsson, Abhishek Kumar, Merel C. Verhoeff
{"title":"用下颚磨砺牙齿......也磨砺心智!","authors":"Frank Lobbezoo,&nbsp;Chia-Shu Lin,&nbsp;Mats Trulsson,&nbsp;Abhishek Kumar,&nbsp;Merel C. Verhoeff","doi":"10.1111/joor.13826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teeth grinding (bruxism) is commonly considered sheer jaw abuse because of its purported negative consequences like tooth wear and jaw-muscle pain. However, already in 1960, R.G. Every published a Point of View in the <i>Lancet</i> stating that bruxism-related tooth wear may be positive for the individual, the wear process being a means to sharpen the teeth to be used as tools or weapons.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Now, we would like to propose another possible positive outcome of bruxism, namely improved cognitive function. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Weijenberg et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> concluded that both animal and human studies suggest an association between chewing and cognition. Klineberg et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> elaborated on this conclusion by stating that the increased cerebral blood flow that is associated with mastication could explain its positive effect on cognitive function. Importantly, they also stated that impaired cognition arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors. This was confirmed by Lin<span><sup>4</sup></span> who provides some critical aspects that need to be incorporated into future research. For example, since most of the currently available clinical and epidemiological data are derived from cross-sectional studies, Lin emphasises the importance of prospective cohort studies to enable causal inferences.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Recently, Kim and Han<span><sup>5</sup></span> investigated the effects of reduced chewing ability on the incidence of cognitive impairment over 10 years in a large general population sample. Their findings, namely an about 1.3 times higher odds ratio for cognitive impairment in poor chewers as compared to good chewers, confirmed that reduced masticatory efficiency causally contributes to cognitive decline.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Since both chewing and bruxism are essentially jaw-muscle activities, that is, ways of using the jaws that both improve cerebral blood flow, we carefully assume that chewing-related findings can be extrapolated to bruxism. To further determine the evidence base for the association between jaw usage and cognition, a quick scan of the available literature was performed in PubMed on June 1, 2024, using the query “((“Mastication”[Mesh]) OR “Bruxism”[Mesh]) AND “Cognition”[Mesh].” This search yielded 115 papers, of which 56 did not deal with the topic of interest. Of the remaining 59 papers, only six reported no (or a negative) association between jaw usage and cognition, while 53 confirmed the likely presence of such associations. In some cases, even a causal relationship was claimed. Of note, only one of these 53 papers dealt with bruxism; the others with chewing. Hence, more research on bruxism in association with cognition is needed, bearing in mind that designing such studies will be a major challenge. Nevertheless, based on the above, we dare to conclude that using your jaw, either by bruxing or by chewing, not only sharpens your teeth, but also your mind.</p><p>All authors contributed equally and substantially to the conception, drafting and critical revision of this correspondence, and approved the final version. They are all responsible for all aspects of the work.</p><p>No funding was obtained for this manuscript.</p><p>FL receives research grants from Sunstar Suisse, S.A., Vivisol-Resmed, Health Holland and the Dutch Research Council (NWO), unrelated to this Correspondence. FL is an unsalaried member of the Academic Advisory Board of Sunstar Suisse S.A. for GrindCare. CSL, MT, AK and MCV report no competing interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"51 11","pages":"2498-2499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joor.13826","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using your jaws sharpens your teeth… and mind!\",\"authors\":\"Frank Lobbezoo,&nbsp;Chia-Shu Lin,&nbsp;Mats Trulsson,&nbsp;Abhishek Kumar,&nbsp;Merel C. Verhoeff\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joor.13826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Teeth grinding (bruxism) is commonly considered sheer jaw abuse because of its purported negative consequences like tooth wear and jaw-muscle pain. However, already in 1960, R.G. Every published a Point of View in the <i>Lancet</i> stating that bruxism-related tooth wear may be positive for the individual, the wear process being a means to sharpen the teeth to be used as tools or weapons.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Now, we would like to propose another possible positive outcome of bruxism, namely improved cognitive function. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Weijenberg et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> concluded that both animal and human studies suggest an association between chewing and cognition. Klineberg et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> elaborated on this conclusion by stating that the increased cerebral blood flow that is associated with mastication could explain its positive effect on cognitive function. Importantly, they also stated that impaired cognition arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors. This was confirmed by Lin<span><sup>4</sup></span> who provides some critical aspects that need to be incorporated into future research. For example, since most of the currently available clinical and epidemiological data are derived from cross-sectional studies, Lin emphasises the importance of prospective cohort studies to enable causal inferences.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Recently, Kim and Han<span><sup>5</sup></span> investigated the effects of reduced chewing ability on the incidence of cognitive impairment over 10 years in a large general population sample. Their findings, namely an about 1.3 times higher odds ratio for cognitive impairment in poor chewers as compared to good chewers, confirmed that reduced masticatory efficiency causally contributes to cognitive decline.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Since both chewing and bruxism are essentially jaw-muscle activities, that is, ways of using the jaws that both improve cerebral blood flow, we carefully assume that chewing-related findings can be extrapolated to bruxism. To further determine the evidence base for the association between jaw usage and cognition, a quick scan of the available literature was performed in PubMed on June 1, 2024, using the query “((“Mastication”[Mesh]) OR “Bruxism”[Mesh]) AND “Cognition”[Mesh].” This search yielded 115 papers, of which 56 did not deal with the topic of interest. Of the remaining 59 papers, only six reported no (or a negative) association between jaw usage and cognition, while 53 confirmed the likely presence of such associations. In some cases, even a causal relationship was claimed. Of note, only one of these 53 papers dealt with bruxism; the others with chewing. Hence, more research on bruxism in association with cognition is needed, bearing in mind that designing such studies will be a major challenge. Nevertheless, based on the above, we dare to conclude that using your jaw, either by bruxing or by chewing, not only sharpens your teeth, but also your mind.</p><p>All authors contributed equally and substantially to the conception, drafting and critical revision of this correspondence, and approved the final version. They are all responsible for all aspects of the work.</p><p>No funding was obtained for this manuscript.</p><p>FL receives research grants from Sunstar Suisse, S.A., Vivisol-Resmed, Health Holland and the Dutch Research Council (NWO), unrelated to this Correspondence. FL is an unsalaried member of the Academic Advisory Board of Sunstar Suisse S.A. for GrindCare. CSL, MT, AK and MCV report no competing interests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"51 11\",\"pages\":\"2498-2499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joor.13826\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磨牙(磨牙症)通常被认为是纯粹的颌骨虐待,因为它据称会带来牙齿磨损和颌骨肌肉疼痛等负面后果。然而,早在 1960 年,R.G. Every 就在《柳叶刀》杂志上发表了一篇观点文章,指出与磨牙症相关的牙齿磨损可能对个人有积极意义,磨损过程是一种磨砺牙齿的手段,可以用作工具或武器。Weijenberg 等人2 根据全面的文献综述得出结论,动物和人类研究都表明咀嚼与认知之间存在关联。Klineberg 等人3 对这一结论进行了详细阐述,指出咀嚼会增加脑血流量,这可以解释咀嚼对认知功能的积极影响。重要的是,他们还指出,认知功能受损是多种因素复杂相互作用的结果。这一点得到了 Lin4 的证实,他提出了一些需要纳入未来研究的关键方面。4 最近,Kim 和 Han5 在一个大型普通人群样本中调查了咀嚼能力下降对 10 年认知障碍发生率的影响。5 由于咀嚼和磨牙本质上都是颌肌活动,即都是改善脑血流的颌部使用方式,我们谨慎地假设与咀嚼相关的研究结果可以推断为磨牙症。为了进一步确定下颌使用与认知之间关联的证据基础,我们于 2024 年 6 月 1 日在 PubMed 上使用"(("咀嚼"[Mesh])或 "磨牙症"[Mesh])和 "认知"[Mesh]"查询对现有文献进行了快速扫描。搜索结果显示有 115 篇论文,其中 56 篇未涉及相关主题。在其余 59 篇论文中,只有 6 篇报告了颌骨使用与认知之间没有(或存在负相关)联系,而 53 篇则证实了这种联系的可能存在。在某些情况下,甚至声称两者之间存在因果关系。值得注意的是,在这 53 篇论文中,只有一篇涉及磨牙症,其他都涉及咀嚼。因此,需要对磨牙症与认知的关联性进行更多的研究,同时考虑到设计此类研究将是一项重大挑战。尽管如此,基于以上所述,我们敢于得出这样的结论:通过磨牙或咀嚼来使用下颚,不仅能磨砺牙齿,还能磨砺心智。所有作者对这篇通讯的构思、起草和批判性修改做出了同等重要的贡献,并批准了最终版本。FL 从 Sunstar Suisse, S.A.、Vivisol-Resmed、Health Holland 和荷兰研究理事会(NWO)获得研究基金,与本通信无关。FL是Sunstar Suisse S.A.公司GrindCare学术顾问委员会的无薪成员。CSL、MT、AK 和 MCV 报告没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using your jaws sharpens your teeth… and mind!

Teeth grinding (bruxism) is commonly considered sheer jaw abuse because of its purported negative consequences like tooth wear and jaw-muscle pain. However, already in 1960, R.G. Every published a Point of View in the Lancet stating that bruxism-related tooth wear may be positive for the individual, the wear process being a means to sharpen the teeth to be used as tools or weapons.1 Now, we would like to propose another possible positive outcome of bruxism, namely improved cognitive function. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Weijenberg et al.2 concluded that both animal and human studies suggest an association between chewing and cognition. Klineberg et al.3 elaborated on this conclusion by stating that the increased cerebral blood flow that is associated with mastication could explain its positive effect on cognitive function. Importantly, they also stated that impaired cognition arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors. This was confirmed by Lin4 who provides some critical aspects that need to be incorporated into future research. For example, since most of the currently available clinical and epidemiological data are derived from cross-sectional studies, Lin emphasises the importance of prospective cohort studies to enable causal inferences.4 Recently, Kim and Han5 investigated the effects of reduced chewing ability on the incidence of cognitive impairment over 10 years in a large general population sample. Their findings, namely an about 1.3 times higher odds ratio for cognitive impairment in poor chewers as compared to good chewers, confirmed that reduced masticatory efficiency causally contributes to cognitive decline.5 Since both chewing and bruxism are essentially jaw-muscle activities, that is, ways of using the jaws that both improve cerebral blood flow, we carefully assume that chewing-related findings can be extrapolated to bruxism. To further determine the evidence base for the association between jaw usage and cognition, a quick scan of the available literature was performed in PubMed on June 1, 2024, using the query “((“Mastication”[Mesh]) OR “Bruxism”[Mesh]) AND “Cognition”[Mesh].” This search yielded 115 papers, of which 56 did not deal with the topic of interest. Of the remaining 59 papers, only six reported no (or a negative) association between jaw usage and cognition, while 53 confirmed the likely presence of such associations. In some cases, even a causal relationship was claimed. Of note, only one of these 53 papers dealt with bruxism; the others with chewing. Hence, more research on bruxism in association with cognition is needed, bearing in mind that designing such studies will be a major challenge. Nevertheless, based on the above, we dare to conclude that using your jaw, either by bruxing or by chewing, not only sharpens your teeth, but also your mind.

All authors contributed equally and substantially to the conception, drafting and critical revision of this correspondence, and approved the final version. They are all responsible for all aspects of the work.

No funding was obtained for this manuscript.

FL receives research grants from Sunstar Suisse, S.A., Vivisol-Resmed, Health Holland and the Dutch Research Council (NWO), unrelated to this Correspondence. FL is an unsalaried member of the Academic Advisory Board of Sunstar Suisse S.A. for GrindCare. CSL, MT, AK and MCV report no competing interests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
期刊最新文献
Application of Action Observation Therapy in Swallowing Rehabilitation: A Randomised Controlled Study. Burning Mouth Syndrome May Essentially Be Related To Psychoneuroimmunology: Mechanism Hypothesis. Effects of Mandibular Advancement Device on Genioglossus of Rabbits in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Through PINK1/Parkin Pathway. Predictive Factors for Swallowing Function Decline in Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study. Reporting of Search Strategy Among Systematic Reviews in Leading Dental Specialty Journals: A Research-On-Research Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1