在青少年外化行为的兄弟姐妹收养纵向研究中整合家庭压力模型。

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Research on Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1111/jora.13001
Veronica Oro, Elizabeth J S Bates, Misaki N Natsuaki, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Jody M Ganiban, Daniel S Shaw, Leslie D Leve
{"title":"在青少年外化行为的兄弟姐妹收养纵向研究中整合家庭压力模型。","authors":"Veronica Oro, Elizabeth J S Bates, Misaki N Natsuaki, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Jody M Ganiban, Daniel S Shaw, Leslie D Leve","doi":"10.1111/jora.13001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a sample of linked adopted children, adoptive and birth parents (N = 561), and biological siblings residing in the birth parent home (N = 191), we examined the role of genetics within family stress processes. We tested parental hostility (7 years) as a mediator of the associations between socioeconomic strain and rearing parent psychopathology (4 years) and adolescent externalizing behaviors (11 years) in adoptive and biological parent homes. Next, we examined parent social support (4 years) as a moderator of paths from socioeconomic strain and parent psychopathology to parental hostility. Parental hostility significantly mediated effects of socioeconomic strain and parent psychopathology on adolescent externalizing behaviors in biological and adoptive parent homes, respectively. Equivalence testing of the paths to adolescent externalizing behaviors across family types indicated a negligible role of passive gene-environment correlation. Parent social support significantly attenuated the effect of parent psychopathology on parental hostility in biological families. Birth parent externalizing behaviors were not significantly associated with adoptee externalizing behaviors nor adoptive parent hostility, suggesting negligible heritable risk or evocative gene-environment processes. Full- and half-sibling correlations indicated that children's unique rearing contexts contributed to the parenting they received and the externalizing behavior they exhibited. Implications for intervention are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating the family stress model within a longitudinal sibling-adoption study of adolescent externalizing behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Oro, Elizabeth J S Bates, Misaki N Natsuaki, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Jody M Ganiban, Daniel S Shaw, Leslie D Leve\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jora.13001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using a sample of linked adopted children, adoptive and birth parents (N = 561), and biological siblings residing in the birth parent home (N = 191), we examined the role of genetics within family stress processes. We tested parental hostility (7 years) as a mediator of the associations between socioeconomic strain and rearing parent psychopathology (4 years) and adolescent externalizing behaviors (11 years) in adoptive and biological parent homes. Next, we examined parent social support (4 years) as a moderator of paths from socioeconomic strain and parent psychopathology to parental hostility. Parental hostility significantly mediated effects of socioeconomic strain and parent psychopathology on adolescent externalizing behaviors in biological and adoptive parent homes, respectively. Equivalence testing of the paths to adolescent externalizing behaviors across family types indicated a negligible role of passive gene-environment correlation. Parent social support significantly attenuated the effect of parent psychopathology on parental hostility in biological families. Birth parent externalizing behaviors were not significantly associated with adoptee externalizing behaviors nor adoptive parent hostility, suggesting negligible heritable risk or evocative gene-environment processes. Full- and half-sibling correlations indicated that children's unique rearing contexts contributed to the parenting they received and the externalizing behavior they exhibited. Implications for intervention are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对收养子女、收养父母和亲生父母(561 人)以及居住在亲生父母家中的亲生兄弟姐妹(191 人)进行抽样调查,我们研究了遗传在家庭压力过程中的作用。我们测试了在收养家庭和亲生父母家庭中,父母敌意(7 年)作为社会经济压力与养育父母精神病理学(4 年)和青少年外化行为(11 年)之间关系的中介。接下来,我们研究了父母社会支持(4 年)对社会经济压力和父母心理病理学与父母敌意之间关系的调节作用。在亲生父母家庭和收养父母家庭中,父母敌意分别对社会经济压力和父母心理病理学对青少年外化行为的影响产生了明显的调节作用。对不同家庭类型的青少年外化行为路径进行等效测试表明,被动基因-环境相关性的作用微乎其微。在亲生父母家庭中,父母的社会支持明显减弱了父母精神病理学对父母敌意的影响。亲生父母的外化行为与被收养者的外化行为或收养父母的敌对行为没有明显关联,这表明遗传风险或诱发基因-环境过程可以忽略不计。全兄弟姐妹和同父异母兄弟姐妹的相关性表明,儿童独特的养育环境对他们所接受的养育方式以及他们所表现出的外化行为都有影响。本文讨论了干预的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating the family stress model within a longitudinal sibling-adoption study of adolescent externalizing behavior.

Using a sample of linked adopted children, adoptive and birth parents (N = 561), and biological siblings residing in the birth parent home (N = 191), we examined the role of genetics within family stress processes. We tested parental hostility (7 years) as a mediator of the associations between socioeconomic strain and rearing parent psychopathology (4 years) and adolescent externalizing behaviors (11 years) in adoptive and biological parent homes. Next, we examined parent social support (4 years) as a moderator of paths from socioeconomic strain and parent psychopathology to parental hostility. Parental hostility significantly mediated effects of socioeconomic strain and parent psychopathology on adolescent externalizing behaviors in biological and adoptive parent homes, respectively. Equivalence testing of the paths to adolescent externalizing behaviors across family types indicated a negligible role of passive gene-environment correlation. Parent social support significantly attenuated the effect of parent psychopathology on parental hostility in biological families. Birth parent externalizing behaviors were not significantly associated with adoptee externalizing behaviors nor adoptive parent hostility, suggesting negligible heritable risk or evocative gene-environment processes. Full- and half-sibling correlations indicated that children's unique rearing contexts contributed to the parenting they received and the externalizing behavior they exhibited. Implications for intervention are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Revisiting developmental science research practices during a global crisis. Commentary: The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on adolescent development: Embracing a more ecological perspective. Strategies to promote safety for sexual and gender minority youth in secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis. Challenging the dichotomy: Examining parent socialization goals and behaviors regarding positive affect in Bengaluru, India. Influence of parental mediation and social skills on adolescents' use of online video games for escapism: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1