两个不同的儿科重症监护室对自动瞳孔测量有效性的护理见解。

{"title":"两个不同的儿科重症监护室对自动瞳孔测量有效性的护理见解。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.07.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Automated pupillometry (AP) facilitates objective pupillary assessment. In this study, we aimed at assessing nursing perspective about the utility of AP in neurocritically ill children to understand acceptance and usage barriers to guide development of a standardized use protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional, anonymous, Google™ survey of nurses at two independent pediatric ICUs which have been using AP over last four years. The survey included questions related to user-friendliness, barriers, acceptance, frequency of use, and method of documenting AP findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 31 nurses responded to the survey. A total of 25 nurses (80.6%) used the automated pupillometer and 19 (61.3%) nurses preferred to use the automated pupillometer on critically ill intubated patients. Respondents rated the pupillometer a median [IQR] frequency of use of 7/10 [4–9] and a mean user-friendliness of 8/10 [7–10]. Barriers to pupillometer use included pupillometer unavailability, technical issues, lack of perceived clinical significance, and infection control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurses have widely adopted the use of automated pupillometer in the PICU especially for critically ill intubated patients and rate it favorably for user-friendliness. Barriers against its use include limited resources, infection concerns, technical issues, and a lack of perceived clinical significance and training. Implementation of standardized PICU protocol for AP usage in critically ill children, may enhance the acceptance, increase usage and aid in objective assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><p>These findings can be used to create a standardized protocol on implementing automated pupillometry in the PICU for critically ill children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088259632400294X/pdfft?md5=363dab7af0e82d5d382efeb2adb06600&pid=1-s2.0-S088259632400294X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing insights on the effectiveness of automated pupillometry in two distinct pediatric intensive care units\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.07.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Automated pupillometry (AP) facilitates objective pupillary assessment. In this study, we aimed at assessing nursing perspective about the utility of AP in neurocritically ill children to understand acceptance and usage barriers to guide development of a standardized use protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional, anonymous, Google™ survey of nurses at two independent pediatric ICUs which have been using AP over last four years. The survey included questions related to user-friendliness, barriers, acceptance, frequency of use, and method of documenting AP findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 31 nurses responded to the survey. A total of 25 nurses (80.6%) used the automated pupillometer and 19 (61.3%) nurses preferred to use the automated pupillometer on critically ill intubated patients. Respondents rated the pupillometer a median [IQR] frequency of use of 7/10 [4–9] and a mean user-friendliness of 8/10 [7–10]. Barriers to pupillometer use included pupillometer unavailability, technical issues, lack of perceived clinical significance, and infection control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurses have widely adopted the use of automated pupillometer in the PICU especially for critically ill intubated patients and rate it favorably for user-friendliness. Barriers against its use include limited resources, infection concerns, technical issues, and a lack of perceived clinical significance and training. Implementation of standardized PICU protocol for AP usage in critically ill children, may enhance the acceptance, increase usage and aid in objective assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><p>These findings can be used to create a standardized protocol on implementing automated pupillometry in the PICU for critically ill children.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088259632400294X/pdfft?md5=363dab7af0e82d5d382efeb2adb06600&pid=1-s2.0-S088259632400294X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088259632400294X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088259632400294X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自动瞳孔测量仪(AP)有助于对瞳孔进行客观评估。在本研究中,我们旨在评估护理人员对神经重症患儿使用自动瞳孔测量仪的看法,以了解接受程度和使用障碍,从而为制定标准化使用方案提供指导:我们对两家独立儿科重症监护病房的护士进行了一项基于网络的横断面匿名 Google™ 调查,这两家医院在过去四年中一直在使用 AP。调查内容包括用户友好性、障碍、接受度、使用频率以及记录 AP 发现的方法等相关问题:共有 31 名护士参与了调查。共有 25 名护士(80.6%)使用了自动瞳孔计,19 名护士(61.3%)倾向于在重症插管患者身上使用自动瞳孔计。受访者对瞳孔计使用频率的中位数[IQR]为7/10[4-9],用户友好度的平均值为8/10[7-10]。使用瞳孔计的障碍包括无法获得瞳孔计、技术问题、缺乏临床意义和感染控制:结论:护士们已在 PICU 广泛使用自动瞳孔计,尤其是对插管的重症患者,并对其用户友好性给予了较高评价。使用障碍包括资源有限、感染问题、技术问题以及缺乏临床意义和培训。在重症儿童中使用 AP 的标准化 PICU 协议可能会提高接受度、增加使用率并有助于客观评估:这些研究结果可用于制定在重症儿童重症监护病房实施自动瞳孔测量的标准化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nursing insights on the effectiveness of automated pupillometry in two distinct pediatric intensive care units

Purpose

Automated pupillometry (AP) facilitates objective pupillary assessment. In this study, we aimed at assessing nursing perspective about the utility of AP in neurocritically ill children to understand acceptance and usage barriers to guide development of a standardized use protocol.

Methods

We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional, anonymous, Google™ survey of nurses at two independent pediatric ICUs which have been using AP over last four years. The survey included questions related to user-friendliness, barriers, acceptance, frequency of use, and method of documenting AP findings.

Results

A total of 31 nurses responded to the survey. A total of 25 nurses (80.6%) used the automated pupillometer and 19 (61.3%) nurses preferred to use the automated pupillometer on critically ill intubated patients. Respondents rated the pupillometer a median [IQR] frequency of use of 7/10 [4–9] and a mean user-friendliness of 8/10 [7–10]. Barriers to pupillometer use included pupillometer unavailability, technical issues, lack of perceived clinical significance, and infection control.

Conclusion

Nurses have widely adopted the use of automated pupillometer in the PICU especially for critically ill intubated patients and rate it favorably for user-friendliness. Barriers against its use include limited resources, infection concerns, technical issues, and a lack of perceived clinical significance and training. Implementation of standardized PICU protocol for AP usage in critically ill children, may enhance the acceptance, increase usage and aid in objective assessments.

Practice implications

These findings can be used to create a standardized protocol on implementing automated pupillometry in the PICU for critically ill children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Anxiety and depression in children with siblings who have special health care needs: A systematic review. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the child forensic attitude scale. The effect of animal-assisted intervention on fear in children in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. The pediatric self-management model in asthma: A theory analysis and evaluation. Development and psychometric testing of the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) in pediatric nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1