E. Senneby , A. Holmberg , A. Thörnqvist , C-J. Fraenkel
{"title":"在真实环境中用 405 纳米紫蓝光照射病人浴室表面进行去污。","authors":"E. Senneby , A. Holmberg , A. Thörnqvist , C-J. Fraenkel","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Irradiation with violet-blue light (VBL), in the spectrum of 405–450 nm, has been reported to be effective against pathogenic bacteria.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate whether VBL irradiation could reduce the level of surface contamination at seven shared patient bathrooms in two wards at a hospital in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Repeated sampling of five separate surfaces (door handle, tap water handle, floor, toilet seat, and toilet armrest) was performed in the bathrooms where 405 nm light-emitting diode spotlights had been installed. A prospective study with a cross-over design was carried out, which included two study periods, first with the spotlights either switched on or off and a second study period with the opposite spotlight status.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>In total, 665 surface samples were collected during the study (133 samples per surface). Bacterial growth was found in 84% of all samples. The most common findings were coagulase-negative staphylococci and <em>Bacillus</em> spp. The median number of colony-forming units (cfu)/cm<sup>2</sup> was 15 (interquartile range: 5–40) for all surfaces. In our main outcome, mean cfu/cm<sup>2</sup> of all surfaces in a bathroom, no difference was observed with or without VBL. Clean surfaces (<5 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup>) were more commonly observed in bathrooms with VBL, also when controlling for confounding factors. No difference was observed in the number of heavily contaminated surfaces.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study did not safely demonstrate an additive effect on bacterial surface levels when adding VBL to routine cleaning in shared patient bathrooms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"152 ","pages":"Pages 93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002664/pdfft?md5=fe906fac8dcd06d748f3b7fbb2173236&pid=1-s2.0-S0195670124002664-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decontamination of patient bathroom surfaces with 405 nm violet-blue light irradiation in a real-life setting\",\"authors\":\"E. Senneby , A. Holmberg , A. Thörnqvist , C-J. Fraenkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Irradiation with violet-blue light (VBL), in the spectrum of 405–450 nm, has been reported to be effective against pathogenic bacteria.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate whether VBL irradiation could reduce the level of surface contamination at seven shared patient bathrooms in two wards at a hospital in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Repeated sampling of five separate surfaces (door handle, tap water handle, floor, toilet seat, and toilet armrest) was performed in the bathrooms where 405 nm light-emitting diode spotlights had been installed. A prospective study with a cross-over design was carried out, which included two study periods, first with the spotlights either switched on or off and a second study period with the opposite spotlight status.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>In total, 665 surface samples were collected during the study (133 samples per surface). Bacterial growth was found in 84% of all samples. The most common findings were coagulase-negative staphylococci and <em>Bacillus</em> spp. The median number of colony-forming units (cfu)/cm<sup>2</sup> was 15 (interquartile range: 5–40) for all surfaces. In our main outcome, mean cfu/cm<sup>2</sup> of all surfaces in a bathroom, no difference was observed with or without VBL. Clean surfaces (<5 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup>) were more commonly observed in bathrooms with VBL, also when controlling for confounding factors. No difference was observed in the number of heavily contaminated surfaces.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study did not safely demonstrate an additive effect on bacterial surface levels when adding VBL to routine cleaning in shared patient bathrooms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002664/pdfft?md5=fe906fac8dcd06d748f3b7fbb2173236&pid=1-s2.0-S0195670124002664-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002664\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decontamination of patient bathroom surfaces with 405 nm violet-blue light irradiation in a real-life setting
Background
Irradiation with violet-blue light (VBL), in the spectrum of 405–450 nm, has been reported to be effective against pathogenic bacteria.
Aim
To investigate whether VBL irradiation could reduce the level of surface contamination at seven shared patient bathrooms in two wards at a hospital in Sweden.
Methods
Repeated sampling of five separate surfaces (door handle, tap water handle, floor, toilet seat, and toilet armrest) was performed in the bathrooms where 405 nm light-emitting diode spotlights had been installed. A prospective study with a cross-over design was carried out, which included two study periods, first with the spotlights either switched on or off and a second study period with the opposite spotlight status.
Findings
In total, 665 surface samples were collected during the study (133 samples per surface). Bacterial growth was found in 84% of all samples. The most common findings were coagulase-negative staphylococci and Bacillus spp. The median number of colony-forming units (cfu)/cm2 was 15 (interquartile range: 5–40) for all surfaces. In our main outcome, mean cfu/cm2 of all surfaces in a bathroom, no difference was observed with or without VBL. Clean surfaces (<5 cfu/cm2) were more commonly observed in bathrooms with VBL, also when controlling for confounding factors. No difference was observed in the number of heavily contaminated surfaces.
Conclusion
This study did not safely demonstrate an additive effect on bacterial surface levels when adding VBL to routine cleaning in shared patient bathrooms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.