西班牙一家三甲医院针对院内和院外心脏骤停实施的体外心肺复苏(ECPR)项目的效果。

María Martínez-Martínez , María Vidal-Burdeus , Jordi Riera , Aitor Uribarri , Elisabet Gallart , Laia Milà , Pau Torrella , Irene Buera , Luis Chiscano-Camon , Bruno García del Blanco , Carlota Vigil-Escalera , José A. Barrabés , Jordi Llaneras , Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez , Cristopher Mazo , Jorge Morales , Ricard Ferrer , Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez , Eduard Argudo
{"title":"西班牙一家三甲医院针对院内和院外心脏骤停实施的体外心肺复苏(ECPR)项目的效果。","authors":"María Martínez-Martínez ,&nbsp;María Vidal-Burdeus ,&nbsp;Jordi Riera ,&nbsp;Aitor Uribarri ,&nbsp;Elisabet Gallart ,&nbsp;Laia Milà ,&nbsp;Pau Torrella ,&nbsp;Irene Buera ,&nbsp;Luis Chiscano-Camon ,&nbsp;Bruno García del Blanco ,&nbsp;Carlota Vigil-Escalera ,&nbsp;José A. Barrabés ,&nbsp;Jordi Llaneras ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Cristopher Mazo ,&nbsp;Jorge Morales ,&nbsp;Ricard Ferrer ,&nbsp;Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Eduard Argudo","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze if the implementation of a multidisciplinary extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program in a tertiary hospital in Spain is feasible and could yield survival outcomes similar to international published experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>One tertiary referral university hospital in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>All adult patients receiving ECPR between January 2019 and April 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Prospective collection of variables and follow-up for up to 180 days.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>To assess outcomes, survival with good neurological outcome defined as a Cerebral Performance Categories scale 1–2 at 180 days was used. Secondary variables were collected including demographics and comorbidities, cardiac arrest and cannulation characteristics, ROSC, ECMO-related complications, survival to ECMO decannulation, survival at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge, survival at 180 days, neurological outcome, cause of death and eligibility for organ donation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-four patients received ECPR, 29 for OHCA and 25 for IHCA. Initial shockable rhythm was identified in 27 (50%) patients. The most common cause for cardiac arrest was acute coronary syndrome [29 (53.7%)] followed by pulmonary embolism [7 (13%)] and accidental hypothermia [5 (9.3%)]. Sixteen (29.6%) patients were alive at 180 days, 15 with good neurological outcome. Ten deceased patients (30.3%) became organ donors after neuroprognostication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The implementation of a multidisciplinary ECPR program in an experienced Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation center in Spain is feasible and can lead to good survival outcomes and valid organ donors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"48 10","pages":"Pages 565-574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program for in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a tertiary hospital in Spain\",\"authors\":\"María Martínez-Martínez ,&nbsp;María Vidal-Burdeus ,&nbsp;Jordi Riera ,&nbsp;Aitor Uribarri ,&nbsp;Elisabet Gallart ,&nbsp;Laia Milà ,&nbsp;Pau Torrella ,&nbsp;Irene Buera ,&nbsp;Luis Chiscano-Camon ,&nbsp;Bruno García del Blanco ,&nbsp;Carlota Vigil-Escalera ,&nbsp;José A. Barrabés ,&nbsp;Jordi Llaneras ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Cristopher Mazo ,&nbsp;Jorge Morales ,&nbsp;Ricard Ferrer ,&nbsp;Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Eduard Argudo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze if the implementation of a multidisciplinary extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program in a tertiary hospital in Spain is feasible and could yield survival outcomes similar to international published experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>One tertiary referral university hospital in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>All adult patients receiving ECPR between January 2019 and April 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Prospective collection of variables and follow-up for up to 180 days.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>To assess outcomes, survival with good neurological outcome defined as a Cerebral Performance Categories scale 1–2 at 180 days was used. Secondary variables were collected including demographics and comorbidities, cardiac arrest and cannulation characteristics, ROSC, ECMO-related complications, survival to ECMO decannulation, survival at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge, survival at 180 days, neurological outcome, cause of death and eligibility for organ donation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-four patients received ECPR, 29 for OHCA and 25 for IHCA. Initial shockable rhythm was identified in 27 (50%) patients. The most common cause for cardiac arrest was acute coronary syndrome [29 (53.7%)] followed by pulmonary embolism [7 (13%)] and accidental hypothermia [5 (9.3%)]. Sixteen (29.6%) patients were alive at 180 days, 15 with good neurological outcome. Ten deceased patients (30.3%) became organ donors after neuroprognostication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The implementation of a multidisciplinary ECPR program in an experienced Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation center in Spain is feasible and can lead to good survival outcomes and valid organ donors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\"48 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 565-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析在西班牙一家三甲医院实施多学科体外心肺复苏(ECPR)计划是否可行,以及能否获得与国际上已发表经验相似的生存结果:设计:回顾性观察队列研究:背景:西班牙一家三级转诊大学医院:2019年1月至2023年4月期间接受ECPR的所有成年患者:前瞻性收集变量并随访长达 180 天:为了评估结果,使用了180天时神经功能结果良好的存活率,定义为脑功能分级1-2级。收集的次要变量包括人口统计学和合并症、心脏骤停和插管特征、ROSC、ECMO 相关并发症、ECMO 解除后的存活率、重症监护室(ICU)出院时的存活率、180 天时的存活率、神经系统结果、死亡原因和器官捐献资格:54 名患者接受了 ECPR,其中 29 人死于 OHCA,25 人死于 IHCA。27名患者(50%)确定了最初的可电击心律。心脏骤停最常见的原因是急性冠状动脉综合征[29例(53.7%)],其次是肺栓塞[7例(13%)]和意外低体温[5例(9.3%)]。16名患者(29.6%)在180天后存活,其中15名患者神经功能状况良好。10名死亡患者(30.3%)在神经诊断后成为器官捐献者:结论:在西班牙经验丰富的体外膜肺氧合中心实施多学科 ECPR 项目是可行的,可获得良好的生存结果和有效的器官捐献者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program for in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a tertiary hospital in Spain

Objective

To analyze if the implementation of a multidisciplinary extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program in a tertiary hospital in Spain is feasible and could yield survival outcomes similar to international published experiences.

Design

Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting

One tertiary referral university hospital in Spain.

Patients

All adult patients receiving ECPR between January 2019 and April 2023.

Interventions

Prospective collection of variables and follow-up for up to 180 days.

Main variables of interest

To assess outcomes, survival with good neurological outcome defined as a Cerebral Performance Categories scale 1–2 at 180 days was used. Secondary variables were collected including demographics and comorbidities, cardiac arrest and cannulation characteristics, ROSC, ECMO-related complications, survival to ECMO decannulation, survival at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge, survival at 180 days, neurological outcome, cause of death and eligibility for organ donation.

Results

Fifty-four patients received ECPR, 29 for OHCA and 25 for IHCA. Initial shockable rhythm was identified in 27 (50%) patients. The most common cause for cardiac arrest was acute coronary syndrome [29 (53.7%)] followed by pulmonary embolism [7 (13%)] and accidental hypothermia [5 (9.3%)]. Sixteen (29.6%) patients were alive at 180 days, 15 with good neurological outcome. Ten deceased patients (30.3%) became organ donors after neuroprognostication.

Conclusions

The implementation of a multidisciplinary ECPR program in an experienced Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation center in Spain is feasible and can lead to good survival outcomes and valid organ donors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Academic disobey. Dual therapy with remdesivir plus extended nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in immunocompromised and critically ill patient with suspected persistent COVID-19 infection: Case report. Material and human resources invested in a program aimed at potentially critical trauma patients. Septic shock due to Chromobacterium violaceum after a trip to Azores Islands. A fatal and unusual pathogen. Correlation and concordance of HACOR and IROX scales in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received non-invasive ventilation in two intensive care units.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1