如果围手术期患者路径是正确的,它会是什么样子?

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/ans.19179
David Allan Watters BSc (Hons), MB ChB, ChM, FRCSEd, FRACS, DipPOM, David A. Scott MBBS, PhD, FANZCA, FFPMANCA, DipPOM, Tarik Sammour MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Ben Harris BA/BEc MPPM, Guy Lawrence Ludbrook MBBS PhD MSc FANZCA DipPOM
{"title":"如果围手术期患者路径是正确的,它会是什么样子?","authors":"David Allan Watters BSc (Hons), MB ChB, ChM, FRCSEd, FRACS, DipPOM,&nbsp;David A. Scott MBBS, PhD, FANZCA, FFPMANCA, DipPOM,&nbsp;Tarik Sammour MBBS, PhD, FRACS,&nbsp;Ben Harris BA/BEc MPPM,&nbsp;Guy Lawrence Ludbrook MBBS PhD MSc FANZCA DipPOM","doi":"10.1111/ans.19179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing surgery deserve the best possible peri-operative outcomes. Each stage of the peri-operative patient journey offers opportunities to improve care delivery, with shorter lengths of stay, less complications, reduced costs and better value.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>These opportunities were identified through narrative review of the literature, with consultation and consensus at the hidden pandemic (of postoperative complications) summit 2, July 2023 in Adelaide, Australia</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p><b>Before surgery:</b> Some patients who receive timely alternative treatments may not need surgery at all. The period of waiting after listing should be a time of preparation. Risk assessment at the time of surgical listing facilitates recognition of need for comorbidity optimisation and identifies those who will most benefit from prehabilitation, particularly frail and deconditioned patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> During surgery</h3>\n \n <p>During the surgical admission, ERAS programs result in less postoperative complications, shorter length of stay and better patient experience but require agreement between clinicians, and coordinated monitoring of delivery of the elements in the ERAS bundle of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> After surgery</h3>\n \n <p>At-risk patients need to have the appropriate levels of monitoring for cardiovascular instability, renal impairment or respiratory dysfunction, to facilitate timely, proactive management if they develop. Access to allied health in the early postoperative period is also critical for promoting mobility, and earlier discharge, particularly after joint surgery. Where appropriate, provision of rehabilitation services at home improves patient experience and adds value. The peri-operative patient journey begins and ends with primary care so there is a need for clear communication, documentation, around sharing of responsibility between practitioners at each stage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying and mitigating risk to reduce complications and length of stay in hospital will improve outcomes for patients and deliver the best value for the health system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.19179","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If the peri-operative patient pathway was right, what would it look like?\",\"authors\":\"David Allan Watters BSc (Hons), MB ChB, ChM, FRCSEd, FRACS, DipPOM,&nbsp;David A. Scott MBBS, PhD, FANZCA, FFPMANCA, DipPOM,&nbsp;Tarik Sammour MBBS, PhD, FRACS,&nbsp;Ben Harris BA/BEc MPPM,&nbsp;Guy Lawrence Ludbrook MBBS PhD MSc FANZCA DipPOM\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.19179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients undergoing surgery deserve the best possible peri-operative outcomes. Each stage of the peri-operative patient journey offers opportunities to improve care delivery, with shorter lengths of stay, less complications, reduced costs and better value.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>These opportunities were identified through narrative review of the literature, with consultation and consensus at the hidden pandemic (of postoperative complications) summit 2, July 2023 in Adelaide, Australia</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p><b>Before surgery:</b> Some patients who receive timely alternative treatments may not need surgery at all. The period of waiting after listing should be a time of preparation. Risk assessment at the time of surgical listing facilitates recognition of need for comorbidity optimisation and identifies those who will most benefit from prehabilitation, particularly frail and deconditioned patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> During surgery</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the surgical admission, ERAS programs result in less postoperative complications, shorter length of stay and better patient experience but require agreement between clinicians, and coordinated monitoring of delivery of the elements in the ERAS bundle of care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> After surgery</h3>\\n \\n <p>At-risk patients need to have the appropriate levels of monitoring for cardiovascular instability, renal impairment or respiratory dysfunction, to facilitate timely, proactive management if they develop. Access to allied health in the early postoperative period is also critical for promoting mobility, and earlier discharge, particularly after joint surgery. Where appropriate, provision of rehabilitation services at home improves patient experience and adds value. The peri-operative patient journey begins and ends with primary care so there is a need for clear communication, documentation, around sharing of responsibility between practitioners at each stage.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Identifying and mitigating risk to reduce complications and length of stay in hospital will improve outcomes for patients and deliver the best value for the health system.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.19179\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍接受手术的患者理应获得最佳的围手术期治疗效果。围手术期患者旅程的每个阶段都提供了改善护理服务的机会,可缩短住院时间、减少并发症、降低成本和提高价值:这些机会是通过对文献进行叙述性回顾,并在 2023 年 7 月于澳大利亚阿德莱德举行的 "隐性流行病(术后并发症)峰会 2 "上进行磋商和达成共识后确定的:一些及时接受替代治疗的患者可能根本不需要手术。列名后的等待期应该是准备期。在手术排期时进行风险评估,有助于认识到合并症优化的必要性,并确定哪些患者(尤其是体弱多病的患者)最能从术前康复中获益:在手术入院期间,ERAS 计划可减少术后并发症,缩短住院时间,改善患者体验,但需要临床医生之间达成一致,并协调监督 ERAS 护理包中各项要素的实施:术后:高危患者需要接受适当程度的心血管不稳定、肾功能损伤或呼吸功能障碍监测,以便在出现这些情况时及时、主动地进行处理。术后早期获得专职医疗服务对于促进活动能力和尽早出院也至关重要,尤其是在关节手术后。在适当的情况下,在家中提供康复服务可以改善患者的体验并增加价值。围手术期患者的治疗过程始于基础医疗,也终于基础医疗,因此在每个阶段都需要有明确的沟通、文件记录以及从业人员之间的责任分担:结论:识别和降低风险以减少并发症和住院时间将改善患者的治疗效果,并为医疗系统带来最大价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
If the peri-operative patient pathway was right, what would it look like?

Background

Patients undergoing surgery deserve the best possible peri-operative outcomes. Each stage of the peri-operative patient journey offers opportunities to improve care delivery, with shorter lengths of stay, less complications, reduced costs and better value.

Methods

These opportunities were identified through narrative review of the literature, with consultation and consensus at the hidden pandemic (of postoperative complications) summit 2, July 2023 in Adelaide, Australia

Results

Before surgery: Some patients who receive timely alternative treatments may not need surgery at all. The period of waiting after listing should be a time of preparation. Risk assessment at the time of surgical listing facilitates recognition of need for comorbidity optimisation and identifies those who will most benefit from prehabilitation, particularly frail and deconditioned patients.

During surgery

During the surgical admission, ERAS programs result in less postoperative complications, shorter length of stay and better patient experience but require agreement between clinicians, and coordinated monitoring of delivery of the elements in the ERAS bundle of care.

After surgery

At-risk patients need to have the appropriate levels of monitoring for cardiovascular instability, renal impairment or respiratory dysfunction, to facilitate timely, proactive management if they develop. Access to allied health in the early postoperative period is also critical for promoting mobility, and earlier discharge, particularly after joint surgery. Where appropriate, provision of rehabilitation services at home improves patient experience and adds value. The peri-operative patient journey begins and ends with primary care so there is a need for clear communication, documentation, around sharing of responsibility between practitioners at each stage.

Conclusion

Identifying and mitigating risk to reduce complications and length of stay in hospital will improve outcomes for patients and deliver the best value for the health system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (cPNET): a diagnostic conundrum. Early detection of colonic anastomotic leak. Pointing to success: a discussion of the role of acad achievements in the selection of specialist surgical trainees. Provision and outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgery in a metropolitan versus a provincial population of New Zealand. Standard v mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine modified lithotomy position: a randomized pilot study on 10-25 mm stones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1