将性别分析纳入研究:Gender-Net Plus 研讨会的反思。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-07-13 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102728
Christopher R Cederroth, Brian D Earp, Hernando C Gómez Prada, Carlotta M Jarach, Shlomit A Lir, Colleen M Norris, Louise Pilote, Valeria Raparelli, Paula Rochon, Nina Sahraoui, Cassandra Simmon, Bilkis Vissandjee, Chloé Mour, Mathieu Arbogast, José María Armengol, Robin Mason
{"title":"将性别分析纳入研究:Gender-Net Plus 研讨会的反思。","authors":"Christopher R Cederroth, Brian D Earp, Hernando C Gómez Prada, Carlotta M Jarach, Shlomit A Lir, Colleen M Norris, Louise Pilote, Valeria Raparelli, Paula Rochon, Nina Sahraoui, Cassandra Simmon, Bilkis Vissandjee, Chloé Mour, Mathieu Arbogast, José María Armengol, Robin Mason","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender equality has been a crosscutting issue in Horizon 2020 with three objectives: gender balance in decision-making, gender balance and equal opportunities in project teams at all levels, and inclusion of the gender dimension in research and innovation content. Between 2017 and 2022, the EU funded, in collaboration with national agencies, 13 transnational projects under \"GENDER-NET Plus\" that explored how to best integrate both sex and gender into studies ranging from social sciences, humanities, and health research. As the projects neared completion, forty researchers from these interdisciplinary teams met in November 2022 to share experiences, discuss challenges, and consider the best ways forward to incorporate sex and gender in research. Here, we summarize the reflections from this workshop and provide some recommendations for i) how to plan the studies (e.g., how to define sex and/or gender and their dimensions, rationale for the hypotheses, identification of data that can best answer the research question), ii) how to conduct them (e.g., adjust definitions and dimensions, perform pilot studies to ensure proper use of terminology and revise until consensus is achieved), and iii) how to analyze and report the findings being mindful of any real-world impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating gender analysis into research: reflections from the Gender-Net Plus workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher R Cederroth, Brian D Earp, Hernando C Gómez Prada, Carlotta M Jarach, Shlomit A Lir, Colleen M Norris, Louise Pilote, Valeria Raparelli, Paula Rochon, Nina Sahraoui, Cassandra Simmon, Bilkis Vissandjee, Chloé Mour, Mathieu Arbogast, José María Armengol, Robin Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gender equality has been a crosscutting issue in Horizon 2020 with three objectives: gender balance in decision-making, gender balance and equal opportunities in project teams at all levels, and inclusion of the gender dimension in research and innovation content. Between 2017 and 2022, the EU funded, in collaboration with national agencies, 13 transnational projects under \\\"GENDER-NET Plus\\\" that explored how to best integrate both sex and gender into studies ranging from social sciences, humanities, and health research. As the projects neared completion, forty researchers from these interdisciplinary teams met in November 2022 to share experiences, discuss challenges, and consider the best ways forward to incorporate sex and gender in research. Here, we summarize the reflections from this workshop and provide some recommendations for i) how to plan the studies (e.g., how to define sex and/or gender and their dimensions, rationale for the hypotheses, identification of data that can best answer the research question), ii) how to conduct them (e.g., adjust definitions and dimensions, perform pilot studies to ensure proper use of terminology and revise until consensus is achieved), and iii) how to analyze and report the findings being mindful of any real-world impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102728\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102728","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别平等一直是 "地平线 2020 "的一个跨领域问题,有三个目标:决策中的性别平衡、各级项目团队中的性别平衡和机会平等,以及在研究和创新内容中纳入性别维度。2017 年至 2022 年期间,欧盟与国家机构合作,资助了 "GENDER-NET Plus "下的 13 个跨国项目,探讨如何将性与性别最好地融入社会科学、人文科学和健康研究等各种研究中。随着这些项目接近尾声,来自这些跨学科团队的 40 名研究人员于 2022 年 11 月聚首一堂,分享经验、讨论挑战,并思考将性与性别问题纳入研究的最佳途径。在此,我们总结了此次研讨会的反思,并就以下方面提出了一些建议:i) 如何规划研究(例如,如何定义性和/或性别及其维度、假设的基本原理、确定能够最好地回答研究问题的数据);ii) 如何开展研究(例如,调整定义和维度、开展试点研究以确保术语的正确使用,并在达成共识之前进行修订);iii) 如何分析和报告研究结果,并注意对现实世界的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating gender analysis into research: reflections from the Gender-Net Plus workshop.

Gender equality has been a crosscutting issue in Horizon 2020 with three objectives: gender balance in decision-making, gender balance and equal opportunities in project teams at all levels, and inclusion of the gender dimension in research and innovation content. Between 2017 and 2022, the EU funded, in collaboration with national agencies, 13 transnational projects under "GENDER-NET Plus" that explored how to best integrate both sex and gender into studies ranging from social sciences, humanities, and health research. As the projects neared completion, forty researchers from these interdisciplinary teams met in November 2022 to share experiences, discuss challenges, and consider the best ways forward to incorporate sex and gender in research. Here, we summarize the reflections from this workshop and provide some recommendations for i) how to plan the studies (e.g., how to define sex and/or gender and their dimensions, rationale for the hypotheses, identification of data that can best answer the research question), ii) how to conduct them (e.g., adjust definitions and dimensions, perform pilot studies to ensure proper use of terminology and revise until consensus is achieved), and iii) how to analyze and report the findings being mindful of any real-world impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors associated with post-tuberculosis sequelae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CVN424, a GPR6 inverse agonist, for Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations: a double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial. Diagnostic performance of deep learning for infectious keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut microbiota in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an individual based analysis of publicly available data. The global burden of enteric fever, 2017-2021: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1