罗莫单抗对器械手术围手术期管理的潜在影响。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS JOR Spine Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.1356
Koji Ishikawa, Soji Tani, Tomoaki Toyone, Koki Tsuchiya, Tomoko Towatari, Yusuke Oshita, Ryo Yamamura, Kazuki Wada, Takashi Nagai, Toshiyuki Shirahata, Katsunori Inagaki, Kudo Yoshifumi
{"title":"罗莫单抗对器械手术围手术期管理的潜在影响。","authors":"Koji Ishikawa,&nbsp;Soji Tani,&nbsp;Tomoaki Toyone,&nbsp;Koki Tsuchiya,&nbsp;Tomoko Towatari,&nbsp;Yusuke Oshita,&nbsp;Ryo Yamamura,&nbsp;Kazuki Wada,&nbsp;Takashi Nagai,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Shirahata,&nbsp;Katsunori Inagaki,&nbsp;Kudo Yoshifumi","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.1356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Age-related changes in bone health increase the risk for complications in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Osteoporosis is a key therapeutic target that needs to be addressed to ensure successful instrumentation surgery. The effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in orthopedic surgery, particularly the new drug romosozumab, is still unknown. We aim to evaluate the effect of 3-month romosozumab treatment on biomechanical parameters related to spinal instrumentation surgery, using the Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT)-based Finite Element Method (FEM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This open-labeled, prospective study included 81 patients aged 60 to 90 years, who met the osteoporosis criteria and were scheduled for either romosozumab or eldecalcitol treatment. Patients were assessed using blood samples, dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), and QCT. Biomechanical parameters were evaluated using FEM at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoints were biomechanical parameters at 3 months, while secondary endpoints included changes in regional volumetric bone mineral density around the pedicle (P-vBMD) and vertebral body (V-vBMD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Romosozumab treatment led to significant gains in P-vBMD, and V-vBMD compared to eldecalcitol at 3 months. Notably, the romosozumab group showed greater improvements in all biomechanical parameters estimated by FEM at 3 months compared to the eldecalcitol group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Romosozumab significantly increased the regional vBMD as well as biomechanical parameters, potentially offering clinical benefits in reducing post-operative complications in patients with osteoporosis undergoing orthopedic instrumentation surgery. This study highlights the novel advantages of romosozumab treatment and advocates further research on its effectiveness in perioperative management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential effect of romosozumab on perioperative management for instrumentation surgery\",\"authors\":\"Koji Ishikawa,&nbsp;Soji Tani,&nbsp;Tomoaki Toyone,&nbsp;Koki Tsuchiya,&nbsp;Tomoko Towatari,&nbsp;Yusuke Oshita,&nbsp;Ryo Yamamura,&nbsp;Kazuki Wada,&nbsp;Takashi Nagai,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Shirahata,&nbsp;Katsunori Inagaki,&nbsp;Kudo Yoshifumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsp2.1356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Age-related changes in bone health increase the risk for complications in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Osteoporosis is a key therapeutic target that needs to be addressed to ensure successful instrumentation surgery. The effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in orthopedic surgery, particularly the new drug romosozumab, is still unknown. We aim to evaluate the effect of 3-month romosozumab treatment on biomechanical parameters related to spinal instrumentation surgery, using the Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT)-based Finite Element Method (FEM).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This open-labeled, prospective study included 81 patients aged 60 to 90 years, who met the osteoporosis criteria and were scheduled for either romosozumab or eldecalcitol treatment. Patients were assessed using blood samples, dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), and QCT. Biomechanical parameters were evaluated using FEM at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoints were biomechanical parameters at 3 months, while secondary endpoints included changes in regional volumetric bone mineral density around the pedicle (P-vBMD) and vertebral body (V-vBMD).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Romosozumab treatment led to significant gains in P-vBMD, and V-vBMD compared to eldecalcitol at 3 months. Notably, the romosozumab group showed greater improvements in all biomechanical parameters estimated by FEM at 3 months compared to the eldecalcitol group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Romosozumab significantly increased the regional vBMD as well as biomechanical parameters, potentially offering clinical benefits in reducing post-operative complications in patients with osteoporosis undergoing orthopedic instrumentation surgery. This study highlights the novel advantages of romosozumab treatment and advocates further research on its effectiveness in perioperative management.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOR Spine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOR Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.1356\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.1356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与年龄相关的骨骼健康变化会增加接受骨科手术的老年患者出现并发症的风险。骨质疏松症是确保器械手术成功的关键治疗目标。骨科手术中的药物干预,尤其是新药罗莫司单抗的疗效尚不清楚。我们旨在使用基于定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)的有限元方法(FEM),评估为期 3 个月的罗莫索单抗治疗对脊柱器械手术相关生物力学参数的影响:这项开放标签的前瞻性研究纳入了81名年龄在60至90岁之间、符合骨质疏松症标准并计划接受罗莫索单抗或艾地骨化醇治疗的患者。研究人员使用血液样本、双能量吸收测定法(DXA)和 QCT 对患者进行了评估。在基线和治疗后 3 个月,使用 FEM 对生物力学参数进行评估。主要终点是3个月时的生物力学参数,次要终点包括椎弓根周围(P-vBMD)和椎体(V-vBMD)区域体积骨矿密度的变化:结果:罗莫索单抗治疗3个月后,P-vBMD和V-vBMD均明显高于埃尔德卡西妥。值得注意的是,与埃尔德钙化醇组相比,罗莫索单抗组在3个月时通过FEM估算的所有生物力学参数都有了更大的改善:结论:罗莫索单抗能明显增加区域vBMD和生物力学参数,在减少接受骨科器械手术的骨质疏松症患者的术后并发症方面具有潜在的临床益处。本研究强调了罗莫司单抗治疗的新优势,并提倡进一步研究其在围手术期管理中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The potential effect of romosozumab on perioperative management for instrumentation surgery

Background

Age-related changes in bone health increase the risk for complications in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Osteoporosis is a key therapeutic target that needs to be addressed to ensure successful instrumentation surgery. The effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in orthopedic surgery, particularly the new drug romosozumab, is still unknown. We aim to evaluate the effect of 3-month romosozumab treatment on biomechanical parameters related to spinal instrumentation surgery, using the Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT)-based Finite Element Method (FEM).

Methods

This open-labeled, prospective study included 81 patients aged 60 to 90 years, who met the osteoporosis criteria and were scheduled for either romosozumab or eldecalcitol treatment. Patients were assessed using blood samples, dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), and QCT. Biomechanical parameters were evaluated using FEM at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoints were biomechanical parameters at 3 months, while secondary endpoints included changes in regional volumetric bone mineral density around the pedicle (P-vBMD) and vertebral body (V-vBMD).

Results

Romosozumab treatment led to significant gains in P-vBMD, and V-vBMD compared to eldecalcitol at 3 months. Notably, the romosozumab group showed greater improvements in all biomechanical parameters estimated by FEM at 3 months compared to the eldecalcitol group.

Conclusion

Romosozumab significantly increased the regional vBMD as well as biomechanical parameters, potentially offering clinical benefits in reducing post-operative complications in patients with osteoporosis undergoing orthopedic instrumentation surgery. This study highlights the novel advantages of romosozumab treatment and advocates further research on its effectiveness in perioperative management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based structure segmentation and intramuscular fat annotation on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging Development and validation of deep learning models for identifying the brand of pedicle screws on plain spine radiographs Neural network segmentation of disc volume from magnetic resonance images and the effect of degeneration and spinal level Protective effects of curcumin against spinal cord injury Clinical implications of linking microstructure, spatial biochemical, spatial biomechanical, and radiological features in ligamentum flavum degeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1