丛集性头痛的残疾程度高于发作频率--丛集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)英文版的结果和验证。

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Headache and Pain Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8
Katharina Kamm, Andreas Straube, Mark Burish, Ruth Ruscheweyh
{"title":"丛集性头痛的残疾程度高于发作频率--丛集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)英文版的结果和验证。","authors":"Katharina Kamm, Andreas Straube, Mark Burish, Ruth Ruscheweyh","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cluster headache (CH) is associated with high disability. The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a short, disease-specific disability questionnaire first developed and validated in German. Here, we validated the English version of this questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CHIQ was assessed together with nonspecific headache-related disability questionnaires in CH patients from a tertiary headache center and an American self-help group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>155 active episodic and chronic CH patients were included. The CHIQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, n = 44). Factor analysis identified a single factor. Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with the Headache Impact Test™ (HIT-6™, ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS depression: ρ = 0.53, HADS anxiety: ρ = 0.61, both p < 0.001), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and with CH attack frequency (ρ = 0.29, p < 0.001). Chronic CH patients showed the highest CHIQ scores (25.4 ± 7.9, n = 76), followed by active episodic CH and episodic CH patients in remission (active eCH: 22.2 ± 8.7, n = 79; eCH in remission: 14.1 ± 13.1, n = 127; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CHIQ was graded into 5 levels from \"no to low impact\" to \"extreme impact\" based on the patients' perception. Higher CHIQ grading was associated with higher attack and acute medication frequency, HIT-6™, HADS and PSS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The English version of the CHIQ is a reliable, valid, and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of headaches on CH patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability in cluster headache is more than attack frequency - results from and validation of the English version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Kamm, Andreas Straube, Mark Burish, Ruth Ruscheweyh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cluster headache (CH) is associated with high disability. The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a short, disease-specific disability questionnaire first developed and validated in German. Here, we validated the English version of this questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CHIQ was assessed together with nonspecific headache-related disability questionnaires in CH patients from a tertiary headache center and an American self-help group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>155 active episodic and chronic CH patients were included. The CHIQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, n = 44). Factor analysis identified a single factor. Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with the Headache Impact Test™ (HIT-6™, ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS depression: ρ = 0.53, HADS anxiety: ρ = 0.61, both p < 0.001), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and with CH attack frequency (ρ = 0.29, p < 0.001). Chronic CH patients showed the highest CHIQ scores (25.4 ± 7.9, n = 76), followed by active episodic CH and episodic CH patients in remission (active eCH: 22.2 ± 8.7, n = 79; eCH in remission: 14.1 ± 13.1, n = 127; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CHIQ was graded into 5 levels from \\\"no to low impact\\\" to \\\"extreme impact\\\" based on the patients' perception. Higher CHIQ grading was associated with higher attack and acute medication frequency, HIT-6™, HADS and PSS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The English version of the CHIQ is a reliable, valid, and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of headaches on CH patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:丛集性头痛(CH丛集性头痛(CH)与高度残疾有关。丛集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)是一份简短的、针对特定疾病的残疾问卷,最初是在德国开发和验证的。在此,我们对该问卷的英文版进行了验证:方法:我们对一家三级头痛中心和一个美国自助小组的头痛患者进行了CHIQ和非特异性头痛相关残疾问卷的评估:结果:共纳入了 155 名活跃的发作性和慢性 CH 患者。CHIQ显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.91)和测试-再测可靠性(ICC = 0.93,n = 44)。因子分析确定了一个因子。与头痛影响测试™(HIT-6™,ρ = 0.72,p < 0.001)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS 抑郁:ρ = 0.53,HADS 焦虑:ρ = 0.61,均 p < 0.001)、知觉压力量表(PSS-10,ρ = 0.61,p < 0.001)以及慢性CH发作频率(ρ = 0.29,p < 0.001)之间的显著相关性显示了其收敛有效性。慢性 CH 患者的 CHIQ 分数最高(25.4 ± 7.9,n = 76),其次是活动性发作性 CH 和缓解期发作性 CH 患者(活动性 eCH:22.2 ± 8.7,n = 79;缓解期 eCH:14.1 ± 13.1,n = 127;P < 0.001)。此外,根据患者的感知,CHIQ 被分为 5 级,从 "无至低影响 "到 "极度影响"。CHIQ分级越高,发作和急性用药频率、HIT-6™、HADS和PSS评分越高:结论:英文版 CHIQ 是一种可靠、有效且针对特定疾病的患者报告结果测量方法,可用于评估头痛对 CH 患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disability in cluster headache is more than attack frequency - results from and validation of the English version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).

Background: Cluster headache (CH) is associated with high disability. The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a short, disease-specific disability questionnaire first developed and validated in German. Here, we validated the English version of this questionnaire.

Methods: The CHIQ was assessed together with nonspecific headache-related disability questionnaires in CH patients from a tertiary headache center and an American self-help group.

Results: 155 active episodic and chronic CH patients were included. The CHIQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, n = 44). Factor analysis identified a single factor. Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with the Headache Impact Test™ (HIT-6™, ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS depression: ρ = 0.53, HADS anxiety: ρ = 0.61, both p < 0.001), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and with CH attack frequency (ρ = 0.29, p < 0.001). Chronic CH patients showed the highest CHIQ scores (25.4 ± 7.9, n = 76), followed by active episodic CH and episodic CH patients in remission (active eCH: 22.2 ± 8.7, n = 79; eCH in remission: 14.1 ± 13.1, n = 127; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CHIQ was graded into 5 levels from "no to low impact" to "extreme impact" based on the patients' perception. Higher CHIQ grading was associated with higher attack and acute medication frequency, HIT-6™, HADS and PSS scores.

Conclusion: The English version of the CHIQ is a reliable, valid, and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of headaches on CH patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
期刊最新文献
The PopHEAD study: a population-based, cross-sectional study on headache burden in Norway: methods and validation of questionnaire-based diagnoses. Formoterol dynamically alters endocannabinoid tone in the periaqueductal gray inducing headache. Serum microRNA qPCR profiling and validation indicate upregulation of circulating miR-145-5p and miR-26a-5p in migraineurs. The prevalence of headache disorders among medical students in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study. Attentional network deficits in patients with migraine: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1