使用与测量类型无关的指标来比较血液透析患者的患者报告与基于表现的身体功能之间的决定因素模式。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03745-6
Gregor Liegl, Felix H Fischer, Bernard Canaud, Mark Woodward, Claudia Barth, Andrew Davenport, Marietta Török, Giovanni F M Strippoli, Jörgen Hegbrant, Krister Cromm, Michiel L Bots, Peter J Blankestijn, Kathrin I Fischer, Matthias Rose
{"title":"使用与测量类型无关的指标来比较血液透析患者的患者报告与基于表现的身体功能之间的决定因素模式。","authors":"Gregor Liegl, Felix H Fischer, Bernard Canaud, Mark Woodward, Claudia Barth, Andrew Davenport, Marietta Török, Giovanni F M Strippoli, Jörgen Hegbrant, Krister Cromm, Michiel L Bots, Peter J Blankestijn, Kathrin I Fischer, Matthias Rose","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03745-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We applied a previously established common T-score metric for patient-reported and performance-based physical function (PF), offering the unique opportunity to directly compare measurement type-specific patterns of associations with potential laboratory-based, psychosocial, sociodemographic, and health-related determinants in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed baseline data from the CONVINCE trial (N = 1,360), a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing high-flux hemodialysis with high-dose hemodiafiltration. To explore the associations of potential determinants with performance-based versus patient-reported PF, we conducted multiple linear regression (backward elimination with cross-validation and Lasso regression). We used standardized T-scores as estimated from the PROMIS PF short-form 4a (patient-reported PF) and the Physical Performance Test (performance-based PF) as dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance-based and patient-reported PF were both significantly associated with a laboratory marker-based indicator of muscle mass (simplified creatinine index), although the effects were relatively small (partial f<sup>2</sup> = 0.04). Age was negatively associated with PF; the effect size was larger for performance-based (partial f<sup>2</sup> = 0.12) than for patient-reported PF (partial f<sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Compared to performance-based PF, patient-reported PF showed a stronger association with self-reported health domains, particularly pain interference and fatigue. When using the individual difference between patient-reported and performance-based T-scores as outcome, we found that younger age and more fatigue were associated with lower patient-reported PF compared to performance-based PF (small effect size).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-reported and performance-based assessments were similarly associated with an objective marker of physical impairment in hemodialysis patients. Age and fatigue may result in discrepancies when comparing performance-based and patient-reported scores on the common PF scale. Trial Registration CONVINCE is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Register ID: NL64750.041.18). The registration can be accessed at: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 .</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Gregor Liegl, Felix H Fischer, Bernard Canaud, Mark Woodward, Claudia Barth, Andrew Davenport, Marietta Török, Giovanni F M Strippoli, Jörgen Hegbrant, Krister Cromm, Michiel L Bots, Peter J Blankestijn, Kathrin I Fischer, Matthias Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-024-03745-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We applied a previously established common T-score metric for patient-reported and performance-based physical function (PF), offering the unique opportunity to directly compare measurement type-specific patterns of associations with potential laboratory-based, psychosocial, sociodemographic, and health-related determinants in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed baseline data from the CONVINCE trial (N = 1,360), a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing high-flux hemodialysis with high-dose hemodiafiltration. To explore the associations of potential determinants with performance-based versus patient-reported PF, we conducted multiple linear regression (backward elimination with cross-validation and Lasso regression). We used standardized T-scores as estimated from the PROMIS PF short-form 4a (patient-reported PF) and the Physical Performance Test (performance-based PF) as dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance-based and patient-reported PF were both significantly associated with a laboratory marker-based indicator of muscle mass (simplified creatinine index), although the effects were relatively small (partial f<sup>2</sup> = 0.04). Age was negatively associated with PF; the effect size was larger for performance-based (partial f<sup>2</sup> = 0.12) than for patient-reported PF (partial f<sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Compared to performance-based PF, patient-reported PF showed a stronger association with self-reported health domains, particularly pain interference and fatigue. When using the individual difference between patient-reported and performance-based T-scores as outcome, we found that younger age and more fatigue were associated with lower patient-reported PF compared to performance-based PF (small effect size).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-reported and performance-based assessments were similarly associated with an objective marker of physical impairment in hemodialysis patients. Age and fatigue may result in discrepancies when comparing performance-based and patient-reported scores on the common PF scale. Trial Registration CONVINCE is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Register ID: NL64750.041.18). The registration can be accessed at: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03745-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03745-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们对患者报告的身体功能(PF)和基于表现的身体功能(PF)采用了以前建立的通用 T 评分标准,为直接比较血液透析患者的测量类型与潜在的实验室、社会心理、社会人口和健康相关决定因素的特定关联模式提供了独特的机会:我们分析了 CONVINCE 试验(N = 1,360)的基线数据,这是一项比较高通量血液透析与高剂量血液滤过的跨国随机对照试验。为了探究潜在决定因素与基于性能的 PF 和患者报告的 PF 之间的关联,我们进行了多元线性回归(反向排除交叉验证和 Lasso 回归)。我们使用 PROMIS PF 短表 4a(患者报告的 PF)和体能测试(基于表现的 PF)估算出的标准化 T 分数作为因变量:基于表现的 PF 和患者报告的 PF 均与基于实验室标记物的肌肉质量指标(简化肌酐指数)显著相关,但影响相对较小(部分 f2 = 0.04)。年龄与 PF 呈负相关;基于表现的 PF 的效应大小(部分 f2 = 0.12)大于患者报告的 PF 的效应大小(部分 f2 = 0.08)。与基于表现的 PF 相比,患者报告的 PF 与自我报告的健康领域(尤其是疼痛干扰和疲劳)有更强的相关性。当使用患者报告的T分数和基于表现的T分数之间的个体差异作为结果时,我们发现与基于表现的PF相比,患者报告的PF较低与较年轻和较疲劳有关(影响较小):患者报告和基于表现的评估与血液透析患者体力损伤的客观指标具有相似的相关性。年龄和疲劳可能会导致在比较基于表现和患者报告的通用PF量表得分时出现差异。试验注册 CONVINCE 已在荷兰试验注册中心注册(注册编号:NL64750.041.18)。注册网址为: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients.

Purpose: We applied a previously established common T-score metric for patient-reported and performance-based physical function (PF), offering the unique opportunity to directly compare measurement type-specific patterns of associations with potential laboratory-based, psychosocial, sociodemographic, and health-related determinants in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the CONVINCE trial (N = 1,360), a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing high-flux hemodialysis with high-dose hemodiafiltration. To explore the associations of potential determinants with performance-based versus patient-reported PF, we conducted multiple linear regression (backward elimination with cross-validation and Lasso regression). We used standardized T-scores as estimated from the PROMIS PF short-form 4a (patient-reported PF) and the Physical Performance Test (performance-based PF) as dependent variables.

Results: Performance-based and patient-reported PF were both significantly associated with a laboratory marker-based indicator of muscle mass (simplified creatinine index), although the effects were relatively small (partial f2 = 0.04). Age was negatively associated with PF; the effect size was larger for performance-based (partial f2 = 0.12) than for patient-reported PF (partial f2 = 0.08). Compared to performance-based PF, patient-reported PF showed a stronger association with self-reported health domains, particularly pain interference and fatigue. When using the individual difference between patient-reported and performance-based T-scores as outcome, we found that younger age and more fatigue were associated with lower patient-reported PF compared to performance-based PF (small effect size).

Conclusion: Patient-reported and performance-based assessments were similarly associated with an objective marker of physical impairment in hemodialysis patients. Age and fatigue may result in discrepancies when comparing performance-based and patient-reported scores on the common PF scale. Trial Registration CONVINCE is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Register ID: NL64750.041.18). The registration can be accessed at: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life of women with a screen-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study Chinese utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument QLU-C10D The effect of social care nurses on health related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: A non-randomized, multicenter, controlled trial The impact of demographic change on value set validity and obsolescence The performance relationship between the EQ-5D-5L composite “Anxiety/Depression” dimension and anxiety and depression symptoms in a large, general population sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1