儿科重症监护室使用氯胺酮的多中心回顾性研究(氯胺酮-重症监护室研究)。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6626899
Christine M Groth, Christopher A Droege, Preeyaporn Sarangarm, Michaelia D Cucci, Kyle A Gustafson, Kathryn A Connor, Kimberly Kaukeinen, Nicole M Acquisto, Sai Ho J Chui, Deepali Dixit, Alexander H Flannery, Nina E Glass, Helen Horng, Mojdeh S Heavner, Justin Kinney, William J Peppard, Andrea Sikora, Brian L Erstad
{"title":"儿科重症监护室使用氯胺酮的多中心回顾性研究(氯胺酮-重症监护室研究)。","authors":"Christine M Groth, Christopher A Droege, Preeyaporn Sarangarm, Michaelia D Cucci, Kyle A Gustafson, Kathryn A Connor, Kimberly Kaukeinen, Nicole M Acquisto, Sai Ho J Chui, Deepali Dixit, Alexander H Flannery, Nina E Glass, Helen Horng, Mojdeh S Heavner, Justin Kinney, William J Peppard, Andrea Sikora, Brian L Erstad","doi":"10.1155/2024/6626899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and evaluate its effect on pain/sedation scores, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and adverse effects (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, observational study in children <18 years who received CI ketamine between 2014 and 2017. Time spent in goal pain/sedation score range and daily cumulative doses of analgesics/sedatives were compared from the 24 hours (H) prior to CI ketamine to the first 24H and 25-48H of the CI. Adverse effects were collected over the first 7 days of CI ketamine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients from 4 PICUs were included; median (IQR) age 7 (1-13.25) years, 54% female (<i>n</i> = 13), 92% intubated (<i>n</i> = 22), 25% on CI vasopressors (<i>n</i> = 6), and 33% on CI paralytics (<i>n</i> = 8). Ketamine indications were analgesia/sedation (<i>n</i> = 21, 87.5%) and status epilepticus (<i>n</i> = 3, 12.5%). Median starting dose was 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr and continued for a median of 2.4 (1.3-4.4) days. There was a significant difference in mean proportion of time spent within goal pain score range (24H prior: 74% ± 14%, 0-24H: 85% ± 10%, and 25-48H: 72% ± 20%; <i>p</i>=0.014). A significant reduction in median morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was seen (24H prior: 58 (8-195) mg vs. 0-24H: 4 (0-69) mg and <i>p</i>=0.01), but this was not sustained (25-48H: 24 (2-246) mg and <i>p</i>=0.29). Common AEs were tachycardia (63%), hypotension (54%), secretions/suctioning (29%), and emergence reactions (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ketamine CI improved time in goal pain score range and significantly reduced MME, but this was not sustained. Larger prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6626899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Ketamine-PICU Study).\",\"authors\":\"Christine M Groth, Christopher A Droege, Preeyaporn Sarangarm, Michaelia D Cucci, Kyle A Gustafson, Kathryn A Connor, Kimberly Kaukeinen, Nicole M Acquisto, Sai Ho J Chui, Deepali Dixit, Alexander H Flannery, Nina E Glass, Helen Horng, Mojdeh S Heavner, Justin Kinney, William J Peppard, Andrea Sikora, Brian L Erstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6626899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and evaluate its effect on pain/sedation scores, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and adverse effects (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, observational study in children <18 years who received CI ketamine between 2014 and 2017. Time spent in goal pain/sedation score range and daily cumulative doses of analgesics/sedatives were compared from the 24 hours (H) prior to CI ketamine to the first 24H and 25-48H of the CI. Adverse effects were collected over the first 7 days of CI ketamine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients from 4 PICUs were included; median (IQR) age 7 (1-13.25) years, 54% female (<i>n</i> = 13), 92% intubated (<i>n</i> = 22), 25% on CI vasopressors (<i>n</i> = 6), and 33% on CI paralytics (<i>n</i> = 8). Ketamine indications were analgesia/sedation (<i>n</i> = 21, 87.5%) and status epilepticus (<i>n</i> = 3, 12.5%). Median starting dose was 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr and continued for a median of 2.4 (1.3-4.4) days. There was a significant difference in mean proportion of time spent within goal pain score range (24H prior: 74% ± 14%, 0-24H: 85% ± 10%, and 25-48H: 72% ± 20%; <i>p</i>=0.014). A significant reduction in median morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was seen (24H prior: 58 (8-195) mg vs. 0-24H: 4 (0-69) mg and <i>p</i>=0.01), but this was not sustained (25-48H: 24 (2-246) mg and <i>p</i>=0.29). Common AEs were tachycardia (63%), hypotension (54%), secretions/suctioning (29%), and emergence reactions (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ketamine CI improved time in goal pain score range and significantly reduced MME, but this was not sustained. Larger prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"6626899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6626899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6626899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中持续输注氯胺酮(CI)的做法,并评估其对疼痛/镇静评分、镇痛药/镇静剂暴露和不良反应(AEs)的影响:多中心、回顾性、儿童观察研究 结果:纳入了来自 4 个 PICU 的 24 名患者;中位数(IQR)年龄为 7(1-13.25)岁,54% 为女性(n = 13),92% 插管(n = 22),25% 使用 CI 血管加压剂(n = 6),33% 使用 CI 麻痹剂(n = 8)。氯胺酮的适应症为镇痛/镇静(21 人,87.5%)和癫痫状态(3 人,12.5%)。起始剂量中位数为 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr,持续中位数为 2.4 (1.3-4.4) 天。在目标疼痛评分范围内度过的平均时间比例存在显著差异(24 小时前:74% ± 14%;0-24 小时:85% ± 10%;25-48 小时:72% ± 20%;P=0.014)。吗啡毫克当量(MME)中位数明显减少(24 小时前:58(8-195)毫克,0-24 小时:4(0-69)毫克,p=0.01),但这种减少并不持久(25-48 小时:24(2-246)毫克,p=0.29)。常见的AE为心动过速(63%)、低血压(54%)、分泌物/抽吸(29%)和出现反应(13%):氯胺酮 CI 可缩短疼痛评分在目标范围内的时间,并显著降低 MME,但这种效果并不持久。需要在儿科人群中开展更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Ketamine-PICU Study).

Objective: Describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and evaluate its effect on pain/sedation scores, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and adverse effects (AEs).

Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study in children <18 years who received CI ketamine between 2014 and 2017. Time spent in goal pain/sedation score range and daily cumulative doses of analgesics/sedatives were compared from the 24 hours (H) prior to CI ketamine to the first 24H and 25-48H of the CI. Adverse effects were collected over the first 7 days of CI ketamine.

Results: Twenty-four patients from 4 PICUs were included; median (IQR) age 7 (1-13.25) years, 54% female (n = 13), 92% intubated (n = 22), 25% on CI vasopressors (n = 6), and 33% on CI paralytics (n = 8). Ketamine indications were analgesia/sedation (n = 21, 87.5%) and status epilepticus (n = 3, 12.5%). Median starting dose was 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr and continued for a median of 2.4 (1.3-4.4) days. There was a significant difference in mean proportion of time spent within goal pain score range (24H prior: 74% ± 14%, 0-24H: 85% ± 10%, and 25-48H: 72% ± 20%; p=0.014). A significant reduction in median morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was seen (24H prior: 58 (8-195) mg vs. 0-24H: 4 (0-69) mg and p=0.01), but this was not sustained (25-48H: 24 (2-246) mg and p=0.29). Common AEs were tachycardia (63%), hypotension (54%), secretions/suctioning (29%), and emergence reactions (13%).

Conclusions: Ketamine CI improved time in goal pain score range and significantly reduced MME, but this was not sustained. Larger prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hemodynamic Management and Postoperative Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study. Efficacy of COVID-19 Treatments in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1