Alberto Aiolfi, Andrea Sozzi, Gianluca Bonitta, Davide Bona, Luigi Bonavina
{"title":"与生物医学植入物有关的前肠侵蚀:范围审查。","authors":"Alberto Aiolfi, Andrea Sozzi, Gianluca Bonitta, Davide Bona, Luigi Bonavina","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Biomedical devices implanted transabdominally have gained popularity over the past 50 years in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, paraesophageal hiatal hernia, and morbid obesity. Device-related foregut erosions (FEs) represent a challenging event that demands special attention owing to the potential of severe postoperative complications and death. <b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The aim was to provide an overview of full-thickness foregut injury leading to erosion associated with four types of biomedical devices. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were queried until December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included all articles reporting data, management, and outcomes on device-related FE. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 132 articless were included for a total of 1292 patients suffering from device-related FE. Four different devices were included: the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis (AAP) (<i>n</i> = 25), nonabsorbable mesh for crural repair (<i>n</i> = 60), adjustable gastric banding (<i>n</i> = 1156), and magnetic sphincter augmentation device (<i>n</i> = 51). The elapsed time from device implant to erosion ranged from 1 to 480 months. Most commonly reported symptoms were dysphagia and epigastric pain, while acute presentation was reported rarely and mainly for gastric banding. The technique for device removal evolved from more invasive open approaches toward minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were mostly reported for nonabsorbable mesh FE. Overall mortality was .17%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Device-related FE is rare but may occur many years after AAP, nonabsorbable mesh, adjustable gastric banding, and magnetic sphincter augmentation implant. FE-related mortality is infrequent, however, increased postoperative morbidity and the need for esophagogastric resection were observed for nonabsorbable mesh-reinforced cruroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"691-709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foregut Erosion Related to Biomedical Implants: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Aiolfi, Andrea Sozzi, Gianluca Bonitta, Davide Bona, Luigi Bonavina\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2024.0167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Biomedical devices implanted transabdominally have gained popularity over the past 50 years in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, paraesophageal hiatal hernia, and morbid obesity. Device-related foregut erosions (FEs) represent a challenging event that demands special attention owing to the potential of severe postoperative complications and death. <b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The aim was to provide an overview of full-thickness foregut injury leading to erosion associated with four types of biomedical devices. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were queried until December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included all articles reporting data, management, and outcomes on device-related FE. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 132 articless were included for a total of 1292 patients suffering from device-related FE. Four different devices were included: the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis (AAP) (<i>n</i> = 25), nonabsorbable mesh for crural repair (<i>n</i> = 60), adjustable gastric banding (<i>n</i> = 1156), and magnetic sphincter augmentation device (<i>n</i> = 51). The elapsed time from device implant to erosion ranged from 1 to 480 months. Most commonly reported symptoms were dysphagia and epigastric pain, while acute presentation was reported rarely and mainly for gastric banding. The technique for device removal evolved from more invasive open approaches toward minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were mostly reported for nonabsorbable mesh FE. Overall mortality was .17%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Device-related FE is rare but may occur many years after AAP, nonabsorbable mesh, adjustable gastric banding, and magnetic sphincter augmentation implant. FE-related mortality is infrequent, however, increased postoperative morbidity and the need for esophagogastric resection were observed for nonabsorbable mesh-reinforced cruroplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"691-709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:在过去的 50 年中,经腹植入生物医学设备在治疗胃食管反流病、食管旁裂孔疝和病态肥胖症方面越来越受欢迎。与设备相关的前肠侵蚀(FEs)是一个具有挑战性的事件,由于可能导致严重的术后并发症和死亡,因此需要特别关注。目的:旨在概述与四种生物医学设备相关的导致侵蚀的全厚度前肠损伤。方法:研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)。在 2023 年 12 月 31 日前,对 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了查询。符合条件的研究包括所有报告设备相关 FE 的数据、管理和结果的文章。结果:总共纳入了 132 篇无艺术性文章,共有 1292 名器械相关 FE 患者。其中包括四种不同的设备:Angelchik 抗反流假体(AAP)(n = 25)、用于嵴修复的非吸收性网片(n = 60)、可调节胃束带(n = 1156)和磁性括约肌增强设备(n = 51)。从植入装置到发生侵蚀的时间从 1 个月到 480 个月不等。最常报告的症状是吞咽困难和上腹部疼痛,而急性症状很少报告,主要是胃束带。移除装置的技术从创伤较大的开放式方法发展为微创和内窥镜技术。食管切除术和胃切除术主要用于非吸收性网片 FE。总死亡率为 0.17%。结论:与设备相关的 FE 并不常见,但可能会在 AAP、非吸收性网片、可调节胃束带和磁性括约肌增强植入物植入多年后发生。与 FE 相关的死亡率并不常见,但在非吸收性网片加固的溃疡成形术中,术后发病率和食管胃切除的必要性都有所增加。
Foregut Erosion Related to Biomedical Implants: A Scoping Review.
Introduction: Biomedical devices implanted transabdominally have gained popularity over the past 50 years in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, paraesophageal hiatal hernia, and morbid obesity. Device-related foregut erosions (FEs) represent a challenging event that demands special attention owing to the potential of severe postoperative complications and death. Purpose: The aim was to provide an overview of full-thickness foregut injury leading to erosion associated with four types of biomedical devices. Methods: The study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were queried until December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included all articles reporting data, management, and outcomes on device-related FE. Results: Overall, 132 articless were included for a total of 1292 patients suffering from device-related FE. Four different devices were included: the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis (AAP) (n = 25), nonabsorbable mesh for crural repair (n = 60), adjustable gastric banding (n = 1156), and magnetic sphincter augmentation device (n = 51). The elapsed time from device implant to erosion ranged from 1 to 480 months. Most commonly reported symptoms were dysphagia and epigastric pain, while acute presentation was reported rarely and mainly for gastric banding. The technique for device removal evolved from more invasive open approaches toward minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were mostly reported for nonabsorbable mesh FE. Overall mortality was .17%. Conclusions: Device-related FE is rare but may occur many years after AAP, nonabsorbable mesh, adjustable gastric banding, and magnetic sphincter augmentation implant. FE-related mortality is infrequent, however, increased postoperative morbidity and the need for esophagogastric resection were observed for nonabsorbable mesh-reinforced cruroplasty.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.