术中三维透视可准确预测脑深部刺激手术的最终电极位置。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurochirurgica Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s00701-024-06214-8
Patrícia Neto-Fernandes, Clara Chamadoira, Carolina Silva, Leila Pereira, Rui Vaz, Manuel Rito, Manuel J Ferreira-Pinto
{"title":"术中三维透视可准确预测脑深部刺激手术的最终电极位置。","authors":"Patrícia Neto-Fernandes, Clara Chamadoira, Carolina Silva, Leila Pereira, Rui Vaz, Manuel Rito, Manuel J Ferreira-Pinto","doi":"10.1007/s00701-024-06214-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the absence of an intraoperative CT or MRI setup, post-implantation confirmation of electrode position in deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires patient transportation to the radiology unit, prolonging surgery time. This project aims to validate intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy (3DF), a widely available tool in Neurosurgical units, as a method to determine final electrode position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study including 64 patients (124 electrodes) who underwent DBS at our institution. Intraoperative 3DF after electrode implantation and postoperative volumetric CT were acquired. The Euclidean coordinates of the electrode tip displayed in both imaging modalities were determined and inter-method deviations were assessed. Pneumocephalus was quantified and its potential impact in determining the electrode position analyzed. Finally, 3DF and CT-imposed exposure to radiation was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference between the electrode tip estimated by 3DF and CT was 0.85 ± 0.03 mm, and not significantly different (p = 0.11 for the distance to MCP assessed by both methods), but was, instead, highly correlated (p = 0.91; p < 0.0001). Even though pneumocephalus was larger in 3DF (6.89 ± 1.76 vs 5.18 ± 1.37 mm<sup>3</sup> in the CT group, p < 0.001), it was not correlated with the difference in electrode position measured by both techniques (p = 0.17; p = 0.06). Radiation exposure from 3DF is significantly lower than CT (0.36 ± 0.03 vs 2.08 ± 0.05 mSv; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative 3DF is comparable to CT in determining the final DBS electrode position. Being a method with fewer radiation exposure, less expensive, faster and that avoids patient transportation outside the operation room, it is a valid tool to replace postoperative CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy accurately predicts final electrode position in deep brain stimulation surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Neto-Fernandes, Clara Chamadoira, Carolina Silva, Leila Pereira, Rui Vaz, Manuel Rito, Manuel J Ferreira-Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-024-06214-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the absence of an intraoperative CT or MRI setup, post-implantation confirmation of electrode position in deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires patient transportation to the radiology unit, prolonging surgery time. This project aims to validate intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy (3DF), a widely available tool in Neurosurgical units, as a method to determine final electrode position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study including 64 patients (124 electrodes) who underwent DBS at our institution. Intraoperative 3DF after electrode implantation and postoperative volumetric CT were acquired. The Euclidean coordinates of the electrode tip displayed in both imaging modalities were determined and inter-method deviations were assessed. Pneumocephalus was quantified and its potential impact in determining the electrode position analyzed. Finally, 3DF and CT-imposed exposure to radiation was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference between the electrode tip estimated by 3DF and CT was 0.85 ± 0.03 mm, and not significantly different (p = 0.11 for the distance to MCP assessed by both methods), but was, instead, highly correlated (p = 0.91; p < 0.0001). Even though pneumocephalus was larger in 3DF (6.89 ± 1.76 vs 5.18 ± 1.37 mm<sup>3</sup> in the CT group, p < 0.001), it was not correlated with the difference in electrode position measured by both techniques (p = 0.17; p = 0.06). Radiation exposure from 3DF is significantly lower than CT (0.36 ± 0.03 vs 2.08 ± 0.05 mSv; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative 3DF is comparable to CT in determining the final DBS electrode position. Being a method with fewer radiation exposure, less expensive, faster and that avoids patient transportation outside the operation room, it is a valid tool to replace postoperative CT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06214-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06214-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在没有术中 CT 或 MRI 设置的情况下,脑深部刺激(DBS)植入后电极位置的确认需要将患者送至放射科,从而延长了手术时间。本项目旨在验证术中三维透视(3DF)作为确定电极最终位置的一种方法的有效性:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括在本院接受 DBS 治疗的 64 名患者(124 个电极)。我们在电极植入后采集了术中 3DF,并在术后采集了容积 CT。确定了两种成像模式显示的电极尖端欧氏坐标,并评估了方法间的偏差。对脑积气进行量化,并分析其对确定电极位置的潜在影响。最后,比较了 3DF 和 CT 的辐射暴露:结果:3DF 和 CT 估测的电极尖端差值为 0.85 ± 0.03 mm,差异不显著(两种方法评估的到 MCP 的距离 p = 0.11),而是高度相关(p = 0.91;CT 组 p 3,p 结论:术中 3DF 与 CT 估测的电极尖端差值为 0.85 ± 0.03 mm,差异不显著(两种方法评估的到 MCP 的距离 p = 0.11),而是高度相关(p = 0.91;CT 组 p 3,p 结论):在确定 DBS 最终电极位置方面,术中 3DF 与 CT 具有可比性。作为一种辐射量较少、成本较低、速度较快且无需将患者送出手术室的方法,它是取代术后 CT 的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy accurately predicts final electrode position in deep brain stimulation surgery.

Purpose: In the absence of an intraoperative CT or MRI setup, post-implantation confirmation of electrode position in deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires patient transportation to the radiology unit, prolonging surgery time. This project aims to validate intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy (3DF), a widely available tool in Neurosurgical units, as a method to determine final electrode position.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 64 patients (124 electrodes) who underwent DBS at our institution. Intraoperative 3DF after electrode implantation and postoperative volumetric CT were acquired. The Euclidean coordinates of the electrode tip displayed in both imaging modalities were determined and inter-method deviations were assessed. Pneumocephalus was quantified and its potential impact in determining the electrode position analyzed. Finally, 3DF and CT-imposed exposure to radiation was compared.

Results: The difference between the electrode tip estimated by 3DF and CT was 0.85 ± 0.03 mm, and not significantly different (p = 0.11 for the distance to MCP assessed by both methods), but was, instead, highly correlated (p = 0.91; p < 0.0001). Even though pneumocephalus was larger in 3DF (6.89 ± 1.76 vs 5.18 ± 1.37 mm3 in the CT group, p < 0.001), it was not correlated with the difference in electrode position measured by both techniques (p = 0.17; p = 0.06). Radiation exposure from 3DF is significantly lower than CT (0.36 ± 0.03 vs 2.08 ± 0.05 mSv; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Intraoperative 3DF is comparable to CT in determining the final DBS electrode position. Being a method with fewer radiation exposure, less expensive, faster and that avoids patient transportation outside the operation room, it is a valid tool to replace postoperative CT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Contusion expansion, low platelet count and bifrontal contusions are associated with worse patient outcome following traumatic brain injury-a retrospective single-center study. Neuroanatomical photogrammetric models using smartphones: a comparison of apps. How I do it: safe resection of a complex type 3 foramen magnum meningioma with dorsal displacement of the neurovascular bundle. Correction to: Influence of preoperative embolisation on resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: cohort study. Retraction Note: Inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase prevents blood-brain barrier disruption and normalizes the expression of tight junction proteins clautin-5 and ZO-1 in a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1