Justin L. Conover, Corrinne E. Grover, Joel Sharbrough, Daniel B. Sloan, Daniel G. Peterson, Jonathan F. Wendel
{"title":"在全缘多倍体格桑花中,同源基因转换和同源交换事件的证据很少。","authors":"Justin L. Conover, Corrinne E. Grover, Joel Sharbrough, Daniel B. Sloan, Daniel G. Peterson, Jonathan F. Wendel","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>A complicating factor in analyzing allopolyploid genomes is the possibility of physical interactions between homoeologous chromosomes during meiosis, resulting in either crossover (homoeologous exchanges) or non-crossover products (homoeologous gene conversion). Homoeologous gene conversion was first described in cotton by comparing SNP patterns in sequences from two diploid progenitors with those from the allopolyploid subgenomes. These analyses, however, did not explicitly consider other evolutionary scenarios that may give rise to similar SNP patterns as homoeologous gene conversion, creating uncertainties about the reality of the inferred gene conversion events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we use an expanded phylogenetic sampling of high-quality genome assemblies from seven allopolyploid <i>Gossypium</i> species (all derived from the same polyploidy event), four diploid species (two closely related to each subgenome), and a diploid outgroup to derive a robust method for identifying potential genomic regions of gene conversion and homoeologous exchange.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found little evidence for homoeologous gene conversion in allopolyploid cottons, and that only two of the 40 best-supported events were shared by more than one species. We did, however, reveal a single, shared homoeologous exchange event at one end of chromosome 1, which occurred shortly after allopolyploidization but prior to divergence of the descendant species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, our analyses demonstrated that homoeologous gene conversion and homoeologous exchanges are uncommon in <i>Gossypium</i>, affecting between zero and 24 genes per subgenome (0.0–0.065%) across the seven species. More generally, we highlighted the potential problems of using simple four-taxon tests to investigate patterns of homoeologous gene conversion in established allopolyploids.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"111 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.16386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Little evidence for homoeologous gene conversion and homoeologous exchange events in Gossypium allopolyploids\",\"authors\":\"Justin L. Conover, Corrinne E. Grover, Joel Sharbrough, Daniel B. Sloan, Daniel G. Peterson, Jonathan F. Wendel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.16386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>A complicating factor in analyzing allopolyploid genomes is the possibility of physical interactions between homoeologous chromosomes during meiosis, resulting in either crossover (homoeologous exchanges) or non-crossover products (homoeologous gene conversion). Homoeologous gene conversion was first described in cotton by comparing SNP patterns in sequences from two diploid progenitors with those from the allopolyploid subgenomes. These analyses, however, did not explicitly consider other evolutionary scenarios that may give rise to similar SNP patterns as homoeologous gene conversion, creating uncertainties about the reality of the inferred gene conversion events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Here, we use an expanded phylogenetic sampling of high-quality genome assemblies from seven allopolyploid <i>Gossypium</i> species (all derived from the same polyploidy event), four diploid species (two closely related to each subgenome), and a diploid outgroup to derive a robust method for identifying potential genomic regions of gene conversion and homoeologous exchange.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found little evidence for homoeologous gene conversion in allopolyploid cottons, and that only two of the 40 best-supported events were shared by more than one species. We did, however, reveal a single, shared homoeologous exchange event at one end of chromosome 1, which occurred shortly after allopolyploidization but prior to divergence of the descendant species.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, our analyses demonstrated that homoeologous gene conversion and homoeologous exchanges are uncommon in <i>Gossypium</i>, affecting between zero and 24 genes per subgenome (0.0–0.065%) across the seven species. More generally, we highlighted the potential problems of using simple four-taxon tests to investigate patterns of homoeologous gene conversion in established allopolyploids.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":\"111 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.16386\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16386\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前提:分析异源多倍体基因组的一个复杂因素是同源染色体在减数分裂过程中可能发生物理相互作用,导致交叉(同源交换)或非交叉产物(同源基因转换)。同源基因转换最早是在棉花中通过比较两个二倍体祖先序列中的 SNP 模式和来自异源多倍体亚基因组的 SNP 模式而被描述的。然而,这些分析并没有明确考虑其他可能引起类似同源基因转换的 SNP 模式的进化情况,从而对推断出的基因转换事件的真实性产生了不确定性。方法:在本文中,我们利用从 7 个全多倍体格桑花物种(均来自同一多倍体事件)、4 个二倍体物种(每个亚基因组有两个近缘物种)和一个二倍体外群的高质量基因组组装中提取的扩展系统发生学样本,推导出一种稳健的方法,用于识别基因转换和同源交换的潜在基因组区域:结果:我们发现在全多倍体棉花中几乎没有同源基因转换的证据,而且在 40 个支持率最高的事件中,只有两个事件被多个物种共享。不过,我们确实在 1 号染色体的一端发现了一个共享的同源交换事件,该事件发生在异源多倍体化之后不久,但在后代物种分化之前:总之,我们的分析表明,同源基因转换和同源交换在格桑花中并不常见,在七个物种中,每个亚基因组受影响的基因数在零到 24 个之间(0.0-0.065%)。更广泛地说,我们强调了在已建立的异源多倍体中使用简单的四物种测试来研究同源基因转换模式的潜在问题。
Little evidence for homoeologous gene conversion and homoeologous exchange events in Gossypium allopolyploids
Premise
A complicating factor in analyzing allopolyploid genomes is the possibility of physical interactions between homoeologous chromosomes during meiosis, resulting in either crossover (homoeologous exchanges) or non-crossover products (homoeologous gene conversion). Homoeologous gene conversion was first described in cotton by comparing SNP patterns in sequences from two diploid progenitors with those from the allopolyploid subgenomes. These analyses, however, did not explicitly consider other evolutionary scenarios that may give rise to similar SNP patterns as homoeologous gene conversion, creating uncertainties about the reality of the inferred gene conversion events.
Methods
Here, we use an expanded phylogenetic sampling of high-quality genome assemblies from seven allopolyploid Gossypium species (all derived from the same polyploidy event), four diploid species (two closely related to each subgenome), and a diploid outgroup to derive a robust method for identifying potential genomic regions of gene conversion and homoeologous exchange.
Results
We found little evidence for homoeologous gene conversion in allopolyploid cottons, and that only two of the 40 best-supported events were shared by more than one species. We did, however, reveal a single, shared homoeologous exchange event at one end of chromosome 1, which occurred shortly after allopolyploidization but prior to divergence of the descendant species.
Conclusions
Overall, our analyses demonstrated that homoeologous gene conversion and homoeologous exchanges are uncommon in Gossypium, affecting between zero and 24 genes per subgenome (0.0–0.065%) across the seven species. More generally, we highlighted the potential problems of using simple four-taxon tests to investigate patterns of homoeologous gene conversion in established allopolyploids.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.