外阴炎、生殖器湿疹和硬皮病:从患者的角度看有哪些成功的治疗方法?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Women's Health Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S448861
Vera Christina Berger, Ronja Fierz, Isabel Kolm, Brigitte Leeners, Cornelia Betschart
{"title":"外阴炎、生殖器湿疹和硬皮病:从患者的角度看有哪些成功的治疗方法?","authors":"Vera Christina Berger, Ronja Fierz, Isabel Kolm, Brigitte Leeners, Cornelia Betschart","doi":"10.2147/IJWH.S448861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genital pain treatment regimens range from local or systemic pharmacological to non-pharmacological, manual and psychosexual therapies with poor to moderate evidence for their efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective therapeutic response (genital pain relief) of different treatment modalities for vulvodynia and the most prevalent other vulvar pathologies, chronic vulvar eczema and lichen sclerosus by means of a cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based cohort study that included 128 vulvodynia, 116 eczema and 79 lichen sclerosus patients was used. All patients attended the vulvar clinic at the University Hospital of Zurich. The patients who had been treated were surveyed from January to October 2022, using a customized online questionnaire consisting of 37 questions on symptoms and treatment outcomes for guideline-recommended treatment modalities. The study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Review Board of Zurich.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 41 patients with vulvodynia, 37 with vulvar eczema and 23 with lichen sclerosus returned the questionnaire. The three groups were similar regarding pain characteristics and comorbidities. All three patient groups reported having benefited from non-pharmacological treatment (improvement rate vulvodynia 54%; eczema 51%; lichen sclerosus 58%), from topical (55%; 55%; 75%) and from locally invasive (46%; 66%; 50%) treatments. Overall, there was no significant difference in subjective treatment outcome between non-pharmacological, locally invasive, and topical treatments for vulvodynia, eczema, and lichen sclerosus. However, the use of oral medication was reported to be significantly less effective (p-value 0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, we found that in the patients' perception, topical, invasive and non-pharmacological treatments, but not oral medications, are helpful for genital pain relief in women with vulvodynia, vulvar eczema, and lichen sclerosus. Therefore, we recommend an escalating therapy approach with first-line non-pharmacological treatments together with topical therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vulvodynia, Genital Eczema and Lichen Sclerosus: What are the Successful Treatments from a Patient's Perspective?\",\"authors\":\"Vera Christina Berger, Ronja Fierz, Isabel Kolm, Brigitte Leeners, Cornelia Betschart\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJWH.S448861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genital pain treatment regimens range from local or systemic pharmacological to non-pharmacological, manual and psychosexual therapies with poor to moderate evidence for their efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective therapeutic response (genital pain relief) of different treatment modalities for vulvodynia and the most prevalent other vulvar pathologies, chronic vulvar eczema and lichen sclerosus by means of a cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based cohort study that included 128 vulvodynia, 116 eczema and 79 lichen sclerosus patients was used. All patients attended the vulvar clinic at the University Hospital of Zurich. The patients who had been treated were surveyed from January to October 2022, using a customized online questionnaire consisting of 37 questions on symptoms and treatment outcomes for guideline-recommended treatment modalities. The study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Review Board of Zurich.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 41 patients with vulvodynia, 37 with vulvar eczema and 23 with lichen sclerosus returned the questionnaire. The three groups were similar regarding pain characteristics and comorbidities. All three patient groups reported having benefited from non-pharmacological treatment (improvement rate vulvodynia 54%; eczema 51%; lichen sclerosus 58%), from topical (55%; 55%; 75%) and from locally invasive (46%; 66%; 50%) treatments. Overall, there was no significant difference in subjective treatment outcome between non-pharmacological, locally invasive, and topical treatments for vulvodynia, eczema, and lichen sclerosus. However, the use of oral medication was reported to be significantly less effective (p-value 0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, we found that in the patients' perception, topical, invasive and non-pharmacological treatments, but not oral medications, are helpful for genital pain relief in women with vulvodynia, vulvar eczema, and lichen sclerosus. Therefore, we recommend an escalating therapy approach with first-line non-pharmacological treatments together with topical therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Women's Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S448861\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S448861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外阴疼痛的治疗方案包括局部或全身性药物治疗、非药物治疗、手法治疗和性心理治疗,但这些疗法的有效性证据不足。本研究旨在通过横断面调查,评估不同治疗方法对外阴炎和最常见的其他外阴病症(慢性外阴湿疹和苔藓样硬化症)的主观治疗反应(生殖器疼痛缓解):采用基于问卷的队列研究,包括 128 名外阴炎患者、116 名湿疹患者和 79 名苔藓样硬化症患者。所有患者均在苏黎世大学医院外阴诊所就诊。2022 年 1 月至 10 月期间,研究人员使用定制的在线问卷对接受过治疗的患者进行了调查,问卷包括 37 个问题,内容涉及症状和指南推荐的治疗方法的治疗效果。该研究获得了苏黎世州伦理审查委员会的批准:共有 41 名外阴炎患者、37 名外阴湿疹患者和 23 名扁平苔藓患者返回了调查问卷。三组患者的疼痛特征和合并症相似。所有三组患者均表示受益于非药物治疗(外阴炎改善率为 54%;湿疹改善率为 51%;苔藓硬化症改善率为 58%)、局部治疗(55%;55%;75%)和局部侵入治疗(46%;66%;50%)。总体而言,外阴炎、湿疹和苔藓硬化症的非药物治疗、局部创面治疗和局部治疗在主观治疗效果上没有明显差异。然而,口服药物的治疗效果明显较差(P 值为 0.050):总之,我们发现,在患者看来,外阴炎、外阴湿疹和苔藓样硬化症女性患者采用局部治疗、侵入性治疗和非药物治疗有助于缓解外阴疼痛,但口服药物则无效。因此,我们建议采用渐进式治疗方法,在使用一线非药物疗法的同时使用局部疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vulvodynia, Genital Eczema and Lichen Sclerosus: What are the Successful Treatments from a Patient's Perspective?

Background: Genital pain treatment regimens range from local or systemic pharmacological to non-pharmacological, manual and psychosexual therapies with poor to moderate evidence for their efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective therapeutic response (genital pain relief) of different treatment modalities for vulvodynia and the most prevalent other vulvar pathologies, chronic vulvar eczema and lichen sclerosus by means of a cross-sectional survey.

Material and methods: A questionnaire-based cohort study that included 128 vulvodynia, 116 eczema and 79 lichen sclerosus patients was used. All patients attended the vulvar clinic at the University Hospital of Zurich. The patients who had been treated were surveyed from January to October 2022, using a customized online questionnaire consisting of 37 questions on symptoms and treatment outcomes for guideline-recommended treatment modalities. The study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Review Board of Zurich.

Results: Altogether, 41 patients with vulvodynia, 37 with vulvar eczema and 23 with lichen sclerosus returned the questionnaire. The three groups were similar regarding pain characteristics and comorbidities. All three patient groups reported having benefited from non-pharmacological treatment (improvement rate vulvodynia 54%; eczema 51%; lichen sclerosus 58%), from topical (55%; 55%; 75%) and from locally invasive (46%; 66%; 50%) treatments. Overall, there was no significant difference in subjective treatment outcome between non-pharmacological, locally invasive, and topical treatments for vulvodynia, eczema, and lichen sclerosus. However, the use of oral medication was reported to be significantly less effective (p-value 0.050).

Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that in the patients' perception, topical, invasive and non-pharmacological treatments, but not oral medications, are helpful for genital pain relief in women with vulvodynia, vulvar eczema, and lichen sclerosus. Therefore, we recommend an escalating therapy approach with first-line non-pharmacological treatments together with topical therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Women's Health
International Journal of Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Women''s Health is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of women''s healthcare including gynecology, obstetrics, and breast cancer. Subject areas include: Chronic conditions including cancers of various organs specific and not specific to women Migraine, headaches, arthritis, osteoporosis Endocrine and autoimmune syndromes - asthma, multiple sclerosis, lupus, diabetes Sexual and reproductive health including fertility patterns and emerging technologies to address infertility Infectious disease with chronic sequelae including HIV/AIDS, HPV, PID, and other STDs Psychological and psychosocial conditions - depression across the life span, substance abuse, domestic violence Health maintenance among aging females - factors affecting the quality of life including physical, social and mental issues Avenues for health promotion and disease prevention across the life span Male vs female incidence comparisons for conditions that affect both genders.
期刊最新文献
Pilot Study of IL-1 Antagonist Anakinra for Treatment of Endometriosis. An Updated Review of Thermal Ablation Technology for Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis: Focusing on Protecting Fertility. Causal Relationship Between Mood Swing and Gynecological Disorders: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Telemedicine for Preoperative Assessment, Surgical Appointments, and Preoperative Education in Gynecological Day Surgery: An Prospective Observational Analysis. A Nomogram Model Containing Genetic Polymorphisms to Predict Risk of Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1