Baran Roshan N S, Bahador Mirrahimi, Farhad Najmeddin, Seyedeh Narjes Ahmadizadeh, Azita Behzad, Seyedeh Masumeh Hashemi, Maryam Alemzadeh, Niloufar Taherpour
{"title":"万古霉素连续输注与间歇输注在重症儿科患者中的曲线下面积比较:随机临床试验","authors":"Baran Roshan N S, Bahador Mirrahimi, Farhad Najmeddin, Seyedeh Narjes Ahmadizadeh, Azita Behzad, Seyedeh Masumeh Hashemi, Maryam Alemzadeh, Niloufar Taherpour","doi":"10.5812/ijpr-145933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing data on the superior efficacy of vancomycin administered based on the area under the curve over 24 hours to the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (AUC<sub>24</sub>/MIC) is crucial. However, data on dosing and monitoring of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in the pediatric population are limited. Previous findings have showed that intermittent infusion of vancomycin (IIV) may not achieve the desired levels, continous infusions of vancomycin (CIV) reach the desired serum concentration faster than IIV and are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the serum concentrations, AUC<sub>24</sub>, clinical variables, and adverse effects of two vancomycin administration methods in the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at a tertiary children's teaching hospital. Inclusion criteria were age between 2 months and 15 years and weight less than 67 kilograms, with exclusion criteria including renal impairment. Participants were divided into CIV and IIV groups following distinct administration protocols. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, including vancomycin serum concentrations, were compiled. Assessments included pediatric mortality risk, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment, and regular temperature monitoring. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using Monolix software 2023R1. Primary endpoints were vancomycin serum levels and AUC<sub>24</sub> between cohorts on day three, with nephrotoxicity and additional adverse drug responses evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were allocated to either CIV (33) or IIV (35) for vancomycin treatment. In the CIV group, 82% of patients achieved an AUC<sub>24</sub> ≥ 400 mg.h/L, compared to 23% in the IIV group. Continuous infusions of vancomycin demonstrated a greater AUC<sub>24</sub> (587.7 ± 184.4 mg.h/L vs. 361.9 ± 113.2 mg.h/L, P < 0.05) compared to IIV. Two cases of nephrotoxicity were reported, one in each group, with mortality and adverse events being comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that continuous vancomycin infusion has a higher success rate in safely achieving therapeutic vancomycin levels in PICU patients compared to intermittent vancomycin infusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14595,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"e145933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Areas Under the Curve of Vancomycin Continuous vs. Intermittent Infusion in Critically Ill Pediatrics: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Baran Roshan N S, Bahador Mirrahimi, Farhad Najmeddin, Seyedeh Narjes Ahmadizadeh, Azita Behzad, Seyedeh Masumeh Hashemi, Maryam Alemzadeh, Niloufar Taherpour\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ijpr-145933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing data on the superior efficacy of vancomycin administered based on the area under the curve over 24 hours to the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (AUC<sub>24</sub>/MIC) is crucial. However, data on dosing and monitoring of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in the pediatric population are limited. Previous findings have showed that intermittent infusion of vancomycin (IIV) may not achieve the desired levels, continous infusions of vancomycin (CIV) reach the desired serum concentration faster than IIV and are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the serum concentrations, AUC<sub>24</sub>, clinical variables, and adverse effects of two vancomycin administration methods in the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at a tertiary children's teaching hospital. Inclusion criteria were age between 2 months and 15 years and weight less than 67 kilograms, with exclusion criteria including renal impairment. Participants were divided into CIV and IIV groups following distinct administration protocols. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, including vancomycin serum concentrations, were compiled. Assessments included pediatric mortality risk, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment, and regular temperature monitoring. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using Monolix software 2023R1. Primary endpoints were vancomycin serum levels and AUC<sub>24</sub> between cohorts on day three, with nephrotoxicity and additional adverse drug responses evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were allocated to either CIV (33) or IIV (35) for vancomycin treatment. In the CIV group, 82% of patients achieved an AUC<sub>24</sub> ≥ 400 mg.h/L, compared to 23% in the IIV group. Continuous infusions of vancomycin demonstrated a greater AUC<sub>24</sub> (587.7 ± 184.4 mg.h/L vs. 361.9 ± 113.2 mg.h/L, P < 0.05) compared to IIV. Two cases of nephrotoxicity were reported, one in each group, with mortality and adverse events being comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that continuous vancomycin infusion has a higher success rate in safely achieving therapeutic vancomycin levels in PICU patients compared to intermittent vancomycin infusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"e145933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302439/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-145933\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-145933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the Areas Under the Curve of Vancomycin Continuous vs. Intermittent Infusion in Critically Ill Pediatrics: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Background: Providing data on the superior efficacy of vancomycin administered based on the area under the curve over 24 hours to the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (AUC24/MIC) is crucial. However, data on dosing and monitoring of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in the pediatric population are limited. Previous findings have showed that intermittent infusion of vancomycin (IIV) may not achieve the desired levels, continous infusions of vancomycin (CIV) reach the desired serum concentration faster than IIV and are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the serum concentrations, AUC24, clinical variables, and adverse effects of two vancomycin administration methods in the pediatric population.
Methods: This study was a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at a tertiary children's teaching hospital. Inclusion criteria were age between 2 months and 15 years and weight less than 67 kilograms, with exclusion criteria including renal impairment. Participants were divided into CIV and IIV groups following distinct administration protocols. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, including vancomycin serum concentrations, were compiled. Assessments included pediatric mortality risk, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment, and regular temperature monitoring. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using Monolix software 2023R1. Primary endpoints were vancomycin serum levels and AUC24 between cohorts on day three, with nephrotoxicity and additional adverse drug responses evaluated.
Results: Sixty-eight patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were allocated to either CIV (33) or IIV (35) for vancomycin treatment. In the CIV group, 82% of patients achieved an AUC24 ≥ 400 mg.h/L, compared to 23% in the IIV group. Continuous infusions of vancomycin demonstrated a greater AUC24 (587.7 ± 184.4 mg.h/L vs. 361.9 ± 113.2 mg.h/L, P < 0.05) compared to IIV. Two cases of nephrotoxicity were reported, one in each group, with mortality and adverse events being comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that continuous vancomycin infusion has a higher success rate in safely achieving therapeutic vancomycin levels in PICU patients compared to intermittent vancomycin infusion.
期刊介绍:
The Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (IJPR) is a peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical publication, scheduled to appear quarterly and serve as a means for scientific information exchange in the international pharmaceutical forum. Specific scientific topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmaceutics, industrial pharmacy, pharmacognosy, toxicology, medicinal chemistry, novel analytical methods for drug characterization, computational and modeling approaches to drug design, bio-medical experience, clinical investigation, rational drug prescribing, pharmacoeconomics, biotechnology, nanotechnology, biopharmaceutics and physical pharmacy.