外用米诺地尔、口服非那雄胺和外用非那雄胺单一疗法对绝经后模式性脱发妇女的比较效果:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Skin Appendage Disorders Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1159/000538621
Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Aditya K Gupta, Mary A Bamimore, Mesbah Talukder, Federico Quadrelli, Bianca Maria Piraccini
{"title":"外用米诺地尔、口服非那雄胺和外用非那雄胺单一疗法对绝经后模式性脱发妇女的比较效果:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Aditya K Gupta, Mary A Bamimore, Mesbah Talukder, Federico Quadrelli, Bianca Maria Piraccini","doi":"10.1159/000538621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are long-standing androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatments; topical finasteride is a more recent medicine. Few studies have compared their therapeutic effects in postmenopausal women. We compared the therapeutic impact of topical finasteride (1-4 sprays of 0.25% topical finasteride solution daily for 12 months), oral finasteride (2.5 mg oral finasteride once daily for 12 months), and topical minoxidil (1 mL of topical minoxidil 5% twice daily for 12 months) in postmenopausal women with AGA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses of individual patient-level data insofar as four clinically relevant endpoints, namely, 12-month change in (1) total hair density, (2) hair diameter, (3) clinical photographs, and (4) patients' opinion of efficacy. Data were obtained through medical charts. Regimens' surface under the cumulative ranking distribution (SUCRA) values and relative effects - as per odds ratios - were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As per SUCRA, the most and least effective regimens - across the four outcomes - were oral finasteride, and topical finasteride, respectively; however, no significant statistical differences were found (i.e., <i>p ></i> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral finasteride is ranked more effective than the topical forms of minoxidil and finasteride; however, more studies are needed to confirm this result.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":"10 4","pages":"293-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparative Effects of Monotherapy with Topical Minoxidil, Oral Finasteride, and Topical Finasteride in Postmenopausal Women with Pattern Hair Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Aditya K Gupta, Mary A Bamimore, Mesbah Talukder, Federico Quadrelli, Bianca Maria Piraccini\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are long-standing androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatments; topical finasteride is a more recent medicine. Few studies have compared their therapeutic effects in postmenopausal women. We compared the therapeutic impact of topical finasteride (1-4 sprays of 0.25% topical finasteride solution daily for 12 months), oral finasteride (2.5 mg oral finasteride once daily for 12 months), and topical minoxidil (1 mL of topical minoxidil 5% twice daily for 12 months) in postmenopausal women with AGA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses of individual patient-level data insofar as four clinically relevant endpoints, namely, 12-month change in (1) total hair density, (2) hair diameter, (3) clinical photographs, and (4) patients' opinion of efficacy. Data were obtained through medical charts. Regimens' surface under the cumulative ranking distribution (SUCRA) values and relative effects - as per odds ratios - were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As per SUCRA, the most and least effective regimens - across the four outcomes - were oral finasteride, and topical finasteride, respectively; however, no significant statistical differences were found (i.e., <i>p ></i> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral finasteride is ranked more effective than the topical forms of minoxidil and finasteride; however, more studies are needed to confirm this result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin Appendage Disorders\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"293-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin Appendage Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:口服非那雄胺和外用米诺地尔是治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA)的长期药物,而外用非那雄胺则是较新的药物。很少有研究比较这两种药物对绝经后妇女的治疗效果。我们比较了外用非那雄胺(0.25% 非那雄胺外用溶液,每天 1-4 喷,12 个月)、口服非那雄胺(2.5 毫克非那雄胺口服液,每天一次,12 个月)和外用米诺地尔(5% 米诺地尔外用溶液,1 毫升,每天两次,12 个月)对绝经后 AGA 妇女的治疗效果:我们对患者个人层面的数据进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,这些数据涉及四个临床相关终点,即 12 个月内(1)总毛发密度、(2)毛发直径、(3)临床照片和(4)患者对疗效的看法的变化。数据通过病历获得。结果:根据 SUCRA,在四种结果中,最有效和最无效的治疗方案分别是口服非那雄胺和外用非那雄胺,但没有发现显著的统计学差异(即 p > 0.05):结论:与米诺地尔和非那雄胺外用药相比,口服非那雄胺的疗效更佳;然而,还需要更多的研究来证实这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Comparative Effects of Monotherapy with Topical Minoxidil, Oral Finasteride, and Topical Finasteride in Postmenopausal Women with Pattern Hair Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are long-standing androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatments; topical finasteride is a more recent medicine. Few studies have compared their therapeutic effects in postmenopausal women. We compared the therapeutic impact of topical finasteride (1-4 sprays of 0.25% topical finasteride solution daily for 12 months), oral finasteride (2.5 mg oral finasteride once daily for 12 months), and topical minoxidil (1 mL of topical minoxidil 5% twice daily for 12 months) in postmenopausal women with AGA.

Methods: We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses of individual patient-level data insofar as four clinically relevant endpoints, namely, 12-month change in (1) total hair density, (2) hair diameter, (3) clinical photographs, and (4) patients' opinion of efficacy. Data were obtained through medical charts. Regimens' surface under the cumulative ranking distribution (SUCRA) values and relative effects - as per odds ratios - were computed.

Results: As per SUCRA, the most and least effective regimens - across the four outcomes - were oral finasteride, and topical finasteride, respectively; however, no significant statistical differences were found (i.e., p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Oral finasteride is ranked more effective than the topical forms of minoxidil and finasteride; however, more studies are needed to confirm this result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Trichoscopy of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus in Caucasian Scalp: A Review. The Comparative Effects of Monotherapy with Topical Minoxidil, Oral Finasteride, and Topical Finasteride in Postmenopausal Women with Pattern Hair Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Erratum. Erratum. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1