我认为他们中的许多人都希望表现出一种 "成长心态":探讨主管对寻求反馈行为的看法。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005838
Shiphra Ginsburg, Lorelei Lingard, Vijithan Sugumar, Christopher J Watling
{"title":"我认为他们中的许多人都希望表现出一种 \"成长心态\":探讨主管对寻求反馈行为的看法。","authors":"Shiphra Ginsburg, Lorelei Lingard, Vijithan Sugumar, Christopher J Watling","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Feedback seeking is an expected learner competency. Motivations to seek feedback are well explored, but we know little about how supervisors perceive such requests for feedback. These perceptions matter because how supervisors judge requests can affect the feedback they give. This study explores how supervisors perceive and attribute motivations behind feedback requests to better understand the benefits and hazards of feedback seeking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Constructivist grounded theory was used to interview supervisors at the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, from February 2020 to September 2022. Supervisors were asked to describe instances when they perceived feedback requests as being sincere or insincere, what led to their opinions, and how they responded. Transcripts were analyzed and coded in parallel with data collection; data analysis was guided by constant comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen faculty were interviewed. Participants perceived 4 motivations when learners sought feedback: affirmation or praise; a desire to improve; an administrative requirement, such as getting forms filled out; and hidden purposes, such as making a good impression. These perceptions were based on assumptions regarding the framing of the initial request; timing; preexisting relationship with the learner; learner characteristics, such as insecurity; and learner reactions to feedback, particularly defensiveness. Although being asked for feedback was generally well received, some participants reported irritation at requests that were repetitive, were poorly timed, or did not appear sincere.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback seeking may prompt supervisors to consider learners' motivations, potentially resulting in a set of entangled attributions, assumptions, and reactions that shape the feedback conversation in invisible and potentially problematic ways. Learners should consider these implications as they frame their feedback requests and be explicit about what they want and why they want it. Supervisors should monitor their responses, ask questions to clarify requests, and err on the side of assuming feedback-seeking requests are sincere.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1247-1253"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I Think Many of Them Want to Appear to Have a Growth Mindset\\\": Exploring Supervisors' Perceptions of Feedback-Seeking Behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Shiphra Ginsburg, Lorelei Lingard, Vijithan Sugumar, Christopher J Watling\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Feedback seeking is an expected learner competency. Motivations to seek feedback are well explored, but we know little about how supervisors perceive such requests for feedback. These perceptions matter because how supervisors judge requests can affect the feedback they give. This study explores how supervisors perceive and attribute motivations behind feedback requests to better understand the benefits and hazards of feedback seeking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Constructivist grounded theory was used to interview supervisors at the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, from February 2020 to September 2022. Supervisors were asked to describe instances when they perceived feedback requests as being sincere or insincere, what led to their opinions, and how they responded. Transcripts were analyzed and coded in parallel with data collection; data analysis was guided by constant comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen faculty were interviewed. Participants perceived 4 motivations when learners sought feedback: affirmation or praise; a desire to improve; an administrative requirement, such as getting forms filled out; and hidden purposes, such as making a good impression. These perceptions were based on assumptions regarding the framing of the initial request; timing; preexisting relationship with the learner; learner characteristics, such as insecurity; and learner reactions to feedback, particularly defensiveness. Although being asked for feedback was generally well received, some participants reported irritation at requests that were repetitive, were poorly timed, or did not appear sincere.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback seeking may prompt supervisors to consider learners' motivations, potentially resulting in a set of entangled attributions, assumptions, and reactions that shape the feedback conversation in invisible and potentially problematic ways. Learners should consider these implications as they frame their feedback requests and be explicit about what they want and why they want it. Supervisors should monitor their responses, ask questions to clarify requests, and err on the side of assuming feedback-seeking requests are sincere.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1247-1253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005838\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005838","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的寻求反馈是学习者应具备的能力。我们对寻求反馈的动机进行了深入探讨,但对督导人员如何看待这种反馈请求却知之甚少。这些看法很重要,因为督导人员如何判断反馈请求会影响他们给出的反馈。本研究探讨了督导人员如何看待和评价反馈请求背后的动机,以更好地了解寻求反馈的益处和危害:采用建构主义基础理论,于 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 9 月对多伦多大学特默蒂医学院的督导人员进行了访谈。要求督导人员描述他们认为反馈请求是真诚的还是不真诚的情况、导致他们产生意见的原因以及他们是如何回应的。在收集数据的同时,对记录誊本进行了分析和编码;数据分析以不断比较为指导:结果:17 名教师接受了访谈。当学习者寻求反馈时,参与者认为有四种动机:肯定或表扬;改进的愿望;行政要求,如填写表格;隐藏的目的,如留下好印象。这些看法基于以下假设:最初请求的框架、时机、与学习者的已有关系、学习者的特点(如不安全感)以及学习者对反馈的反应(尤其是防御性反应)。尽管被征求反馈意见的学员普遍反应良好,但也有一些学员对重复性请求、时机不当或不真诚的请求表示恼怒:寻求反馈可能会促使督导人员考虑学习者的动机,从而可能导致一系列纠缠不清的归因、假设和反应,以无形的方式影响反馈对话,并可能产生问题。学员在提出反馈请求时应考虑到这些影响,并明确说明他们想要什么以及为什么想要。督导人员应监督他们的回应,提出问题以澄清请求,并假定寻求反馈的请求是真诚的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"I Think Many of Them Want to Appear to Have a Growth Mindset": Exploring Supervisors' Perceptions of Feedback-Seeking Behavior.

Purpose: Feedback seeking is an expected learner competency. Motivations to seek feedback are well explored, but we know little about how supervisors perceive such requests for feedback. These perceptions matter because how supervisors judge requests can affect the feedback they give. This study explores how supervisors perceive and attribute motivations behind feedback requests to better understand the benefits and hazards of feedback seeking.

Method: Constructivist grounded theory was used to interview supervisors at the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, from February 2020 to September 2022. Supervisors were asked to describe instances when they perceived feedback requests as being sincere or insincere, what led to their opinions, and how they responded. Transcripts were analyzed and coded in parallel with data collection; data analysis was guided by constant comparison.

Results: Seventeen faculty were interviewed. Participants perceived 4 motivations when learners sought feedback: affirmation or praise; a desire to improve; an administrative requirement, such as getting forms filled out; and hidden purposes, such as making a good impression. These perceptions were based on assumptions regarding the framing of the initial request; timing; preexisting relationship with the learner; learner characteristics, such as insecurity; and learner reactions to feedback, particularly defensiveness. Although being asked for feedback was generally well received, some participants reported irritation at requests that were repetitive, were poorly timed, or did not appear sincere.

Conclusions: Feedback seeking may prompt supervisors to consider learners' motivations, potentially resulting in a set of entangled attributions, assumptions, and reactions that shape the feedback conversation in invisible and potentially problematic ways. Learners should consider these implications as they frame their feedback requests and be explicit about what they want and why they want it. Supervisors should monitor their responses, ask questions to clarify requests, and err on the side of assuming feedback-seeking requests are sincere.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Validating the 2023 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Medical Education Leadership Competencies. World Federation for Medical Education Recognizes 5 International Accrediting Bodies. Irony. Teaching Opportunities for Postgraduate Trainees in Primary Care. How Many Is Too Many? Using Cognitive Load Theory to Determine the Maximum Safe Number of Inpatient Consultations for Trainees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1